Jan Høydahl wrote:
Yes, remove the Office 2003 EOL page
That page was written to have a SEO-friendly resource for people who were looking for options to upgrade from Office 2003 back at the time. It can probably be retired since it served its purpose.
But also consider rephrasing these two: * http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_new_computers.html You are not required to spend $100, $200 or more for a copy of Microsoft Office
This one can stay. What's wrong with it? We shouldn't be ashamed of telling people that OpenOffice is free and that this is an advantage.
* http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_easy.html: Studies have proved it is easier (and cheaper) to move to OpenOffice from Microsoft Office than it is to upgrade to Microsoft's Office 2007.
Yes, this should refer to the past. "Studies that compared upgrade options for Microsoft Office 2003 proved that it was easier (and cheaper) to move to OpenOffice from Microsoft Office than it is to upgrade to Microsoft's Office 2007."
Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
