Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On 12/08/2017 07:53 PM, Marcus wrote: > [...] > Luckily we have 2 volunteers: Carl and Peter. Therefore please vote by > replying to this thread. > > [ ] Carl Marcum (cmarcum) > [ ] Peter Kovacs (petko) > [ ] Abstain (I cannot/won't choose between them) +1 for Peter Kovacs (petko) Herbert -

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

On 09/18/2017 06:30 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: >> On 09/17/2017 04:04 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> On 14/09/2017 Dave Fisher wrote: >>>> does SVN vs. GIT prevent new developers from volunteering? >>&g

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

On 09/17/2017 04:04 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 14/09/2017 Dave Fisher wrote: >> does SVN vs. GIT prevent new developers from volunteering? > > I think this is the key question, even though there are many good points > also in what others replied. > > We currently have a couple semi-official

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

Hi, FWIW we already have an official git mirror of our svn repository. Do a git clone git://git.apache.org/openoffice.git to check it out. Such a repo is currently read-only of course until the project switches officially to git. Herbert On 09/14/2017 11:10 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice

On 09/15/2016 03:35 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > RESOLUTION: That Marcus Lange (marcus) be recommended to the > Apache Software Foundation Board to serve as Vice President > for Apache OpenOffice. +1, approve Herbert ---

Re: [VOTE] Dennis Hamilton as new AOO Chair.

On 2015-08-16 08:57, jan i wrote: This is a call for a formal vote among the 1 candidate for the AOO Chair role. [...] +1, I want Dennis Hamilton as new Chair Herbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apac

Re: [BUILDBOT] - FreeBSD nightly (openoffice-fbsd-nightly)

Hi Gavin, thanks for looking into this! On 2015-05-06 13:46, Gavin McDonald wrote: So the build got further, both configure and buildstrap passed. Now we get libtextcat errors , see: http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/328/steps/build%20--all/logs/stdio

Re: mingw32 for building the ODK under Linux?

On 2015-04-29 00:07, Kay Schenk wrote: I normally set --disable-odk in my builds. When I enabled it today for some testing, I get an configuration error that says -- checking for external/unowinreg/unowinreg.dll... configure: WARNING: not found, will be cross-built using mingw32 configure: error

CVE-2015-1774: OpenOffice HWP Filter Remote Execution and DoS Vulnerability

CVE-2015-1774 OpenOffice HWP Filter Remote Code Execution and Denial of Service Vulnerability A vulnerability in OpenOffice's HWP filter allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execution of arbitrary code by preparing specially crafted d

Re: Spam on bugzilla

On 2015-03-12 17:38, jan i wrote: On 12 March 2015 at 17:27, FR web forum wrote: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117896 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119006 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=24317 Andrea just sent an email to infra, I suspect it is the same the

Re: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?

On 2015-03-03 00:21, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 2015-02-28 23:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Rob Weir wrote: It could be even more useful, of course, if hosted as an actual (read-only) repository, to consult the history of the code base. Isn&#

Re: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?

On 2015-02-28 23:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Rob Weir wrote: It could be even more useful, of course, if hosted as an actual (read-only) repository, to consult the history of the code base. Isn't this part of Herbert's big git repo with the whole code history that it was possible to reconstruct

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

Hi Pedro, I don't currently use git but what I use is not really important: if a move to git were to be considered, it would only make sense if we can rescue the pre-apache history and in particular the Hg CWSs. Most of the open-source history has been preserved. I talked about this in my las

Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On January 30, 2015 7:52:16 PM CET, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > [...] >Who of the two candidates do you prefer to replace Andrea Pescetti as >the OpenOffice project PMC Chair? >[ ] Dennis E. Hamilton (orcmid) >[ ] Jan Iversen (jani) Two excellent candidates. Thanks for running! And many thanks to A

Re: Has "SVN Robot" stopped to work?

On 08.01.2015 18:32, Regina Henschel wrote: I see no notifications in Bugzilla for new commits. The last one I found is in issue 125981 from 2014-12-30. Thanks for noticing! The server must have had an outage at that time. Our svn robot service has been restarted now and the seven missed comm

Re: Officeshots.org

I'll try to provide one for the plugfest. I'll probably have it running on my notebook in a dedicated virtual machine. On 02.12.2014 23:43, Michiel Leenaars wrote: Dear Apache OpenOffice developers, as some of you will know we have the 10th ODF plugfest coming up next week, hosted by the UK C

Re: Issues for vertical layout on Mac

Hi Aron, On 27.11.2014 08:53, aron wrote: I reported a vertical layout issues under Mac at here https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86768 also reported it at OpenOffice's bugzilla https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125908 It looks like OSX's CoreText does fu

Re: Compiling 4.1.1 on MacOS X 10.6.8 (intel) - GCC version problem

On 27.11.2014 12:31, Clive Bruton wrote: On 27 Nov 2014, at 08:35, Herbert Duerr wrote: For building older versions of OpenOffice on Mac please see [1]. I think what you are saying is that there are dependencies in the code that require 10.7. If this is the case then the error reported

Re: Compiling 4.1.1 on MacOS X 10.6.8 (intel) - GCC version problem

On 27.11.2014 01:09, Clive Bruton wrote: I am trying to compile OpenOffice 4.1.1 to run on MacOS X 10.6.8. For building older versions of OpenOffice on Mac please see [1]. It requires XCode 2 or XCode 3, both of which are not easy to get nowadays. They are also almost impossible to install on

Re: about vertical text direction

Hi Aron, On 20.11.2014 11:50, soyol aron wrote: I want to insert a text box which can show vertical text in writter. But It seems like that there is no options for vertical direction text in the combo box in frame’s setting dilaog, just likes the screen shot below. (this is a Libre Office's scre

Re: missing new aoo4.2 win nightly snapshot

On 19.11.2014 20:00, Oliver Brinzing wrote: > Apparently the Windows build gets named after the revision of the latest commit in AOO's trunk > whereas other builds get named after the latest commit in the big ASF repository. this behaviour is new, i first noticed it about two weeks ago. Look

Re: missing new aoo4.2 win nightly snapshot

On 18.11.2014 17:32, Oliver Brinzing wrote: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ Windows Nightly (aoo-win7) Nov 18 02:30 1635806 success #217 Build successful looks like revision 1635806 is build every night ... As of today revision 1635806 is the revision of the latest commi

Re: missing new aoo4.2 win nightly snapshot

On 18.11.2014 23:41, Kay Schenk wrote: On 11/18/2014 08:32 AM, Oliver Brinzing wrote: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ Windows Nightly (aoo-win7) Nov 18 02:30 1635806 success #217 Build successful looks like revision 1635806 is build every night ... linux build is at rev.

Re: Very simple first patch

On 14.11.2014 01:04, Kay Schenk wrote: On 11/13/2014 03:10 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 13/11/2014 Michal Hriň wrote: [...] It is a update of external package :) And here is a problem, but it doesn't depend on you. Policy so far has been: we download build-time dependencies from the Extensio

Re: crash reporter -- can someone supply commit information on this?

On 23.10.2014 01:08, Kay Schenk wrote: I know the crash reporter was disabled sometime before March, 2012. But can someone provide the commit message on this? As far as I know there was no explicit commit for this. Enabling or disabling the crash reporter was a configuration option (--enable

CVE-2014-3575:OpenOffice Targeted Data Exposure Using Crafted OLE Objects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 CVE-2014-3575 OpenOffice Targeted Data Exposure Using Crafted OLE Objects Severity: Important Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 and older on Windows. OpenOffice.org versions are also aff

CVE-2014-3524: Apache OpenOffice Calc Command Injection Vulnerability

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 CVE-2014-3524 OpenOffice Calc Command Injection Vulnerability Severity: Important Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 and older on Windows. OpenOffice.org versions may also be affected. D

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 (RC3)

+1, release revision 1617669 as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1. I checked the Linux build, the source release vs. the repository, the source signature and checksums. Also the German Linux binaries work fine. On 15.08.2014 09:15, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the

Re: Where are AOO 4.1.1 daily binaries for Windows?

On 10.07.2014 17:16, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 10.07.2014 08:56, Regina Henschel wrote: Herbert Duerr schrieb: [...] There was a problem on the win-nightly buildbot. It updated the source to the latest trunk instead to the latest revision of the branch it was requested to checkout. This should

Re: Where are AOO 4.1.1 daily binaries for Windows?

On 10.07.2014 08:56, Regina Henschel wrote: Herbert Duerr schrieb: [...] There was a problem on the win-nightly buildbot. It updated the source to the latest trunk instead to the latest revision of the branch it was requested to checkout. This should be fixed now and the next nightly will get

Re: Where are AOO 4.1.1 daily binaries for Windows?

On 09.07.2014 12:05, Regina Henschel wrote: [...] Build Source Stamp: [branch openoffice/branches/AOO410] HEAD ---^ But I do not find the binaries. On http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ I see a Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Win_x86_in

Re: build break in sw => two nightly builds now switched to the release branch

On 07.07.2014 08:53, Regina Henschel wrote: seems I have been faster ;) Commit done. r1608348 Thanks! I took the liberty to merge the fix into the release branch where the same problem was introduced and is solved now. This event showed that a more regular check of our release branch is neede

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: NSS Module

On 26.06.2014 02:32, Steele, Raymond wrote: Where is the build output located? It is emitted to stdout unless you used the --html option in your build command. To capture stdout either redirect it with e.g. build --all -P2 >stdout.log -- -P2 or use a pipe and the tee command build --all -

Re: NSS Module

Hi Raymond, On 23.06.2014 18:42, Steele, Raymond wrote: After running the configure, the ENABLE_NSS_MODULE environment variable is set to yes, but for some reason NSS is not built. The build fails in xmlsecurity because the NSS libraries were not built and copied over to solver. I have to man

Re: Question ad encoding of "unoinfo java" return string value

On 17.06.2014 21:10, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: According to some older infos about the encoding returned by "unoinfo[.exe] java" the resulting string starts with an indicator byte, where '0' indicates an ASCII encoding (and the paths are delimited with '\0'), whereas '1' indicates UTF-1

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Macro Security Button

Hi Raymond, On 12.06.2014 17:39, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am just trying to set ENABLE_NSS_MODULE=YES.I thought enabling category-b would do this, but that does not seem to be the case. How does one go about enabling the security macros button? I thought it was by enabling NSS and category-b,

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

On 27.05.2014 20:58, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 05/27/2014 05:46 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> We still allow for downloads of "legacy" OOo, so it >> would probably be better to move the older versions to something like our >> current structure -- your second option above? > > +1 > >> And, should the

Re: cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

On 28.05.2014 08:48, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > 2014-05-27 21:25 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti : >> Herbert Duerr wrote: >> [...] >> I'd like to clean up the "localized", "stable", "extended", "contrib" >>> and "package

cleaning up our sourceforge top-level directory

I just noticed that many people seem to download AOO directly from sourceforge and that the directory structure obviously misleads them to download obsolete binaries. Here is the top-level layout and its weekly download count: 4.1.0:843,483 weekly downloads localized: 25,891 weekly downloa

Re: [Lazy Consensus] link to a german forum

On 26.05.2014 23:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Hagar Delest wrote: I agree, we should add the link on the landing page (which has still an old logo BTW). Adding something like "(3rd party)" would be fine. OK. So can someone tell us the best way to write "Third party forums in German" in German?

Re: Tracking bugs like Issue 124985 - [Meta] Meta Bug for collecting bugs which appeal for AOO 4.1.x

Hi Rainer, On 26.05.2014 20:13, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: It's an essential that information should be consistent at any place for Bugzilla. +1 Here an overview concerning priority /severity of the issues listed in the meta-issue; ! Critical major normaltrivial ! Total ---!---

Re: Tracking bugs like Issue 124985 - [Meta] Meta Bug for collecting bugs which appeal for AOO 4.1.x

On 26.05.2014 13:14, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: my experience is that such tracking bugs are not useful. The time invested in adding dependencies (what is rather uncertain, who can know how many bugs are missing and on what facts the various contributors added the bugs to the Meta) should be investe

Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on openoffice-linux64-nightly

On 16.05.2014 11:10, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 15.05.2014 07:54, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:42:12AM +, build...@apache.org wrote: Hi! , The openoffice-linux64-nightly builder has just completed a run STATUS: Success [...] This last mail was from a month ago

Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on openoffice-linux64-nightly

On 15.05.2014 07:54, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:42:12AM +, build...@apache.org wrote: Hi! , The openoffice-linux64-nightly builder has just completed a run STATUS: Success [...] This last mail was from a month ago, aren't the build bots sending this notificat

Re: [ANN] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 released

On 30.04.2014 00:15, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 04/29/2014 02:15 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell: Announced on en-Forum. BTW: Time to create a "4.1.0" value for the "Version" field in BZ. Good point. I disabled the 4.1.0-Beta and 4.1.0-dev versions, disabled the 4.1.0 target milestone, added a 4.2.0

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC4)

On 28.04.2014 17:23, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 25/04/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate (RC4) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0. +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 +1 for releasing this package as AOO 4.1.0 also from me af

Re: [DISCUSS]: Digital signing of documents and macros

A small update on that topic: there is a simple workaround! Signing also works on Mac and Linux if the environment variable MOZILLA_CERTIFICATE_FOLDER is set to the currently active mozilla/thunderbird/firefox/etc. profile. E.g. on Linux setting the environment variable could look like MOZILLA

Re: CMS Build Down?

On 16.04.2014 15:26, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Samer Mansour wrote: Yes, I got the e-mail from infra a few days ago and did it ( https://id.apache.org/). I was logged in to the CMS when I made the commits, not in anonymous mode. So I just tried the CMS and I'm gettin

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 16.04.2014 01:16, Steele, Raymond wrote: Why do you mention the Solaris Sparc UNO C++ bridge below. Is it related to the x86/intel bridge. I am running Solaris 11 x86_64. Ah, ok. Looking at the directory main/bridges/source/cpp_uno there is no UNO bridge yet for Solaris Studio on a x86-64

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 14.04.2014 17:59, Steele, Raymond wrote: Anyone available that understands the OpenOffice bridges or could point me to the correct documentation so that I can begin to understand the problem myself? This has been a road block for me. The OpenOffice bridges are part of the UNO framework. An

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 14.04.2014 17:59, Steele, Raymond wrote: Anyone available that understands the OpenOffice bridges or could point me to the correct documentation so that I can begin to understand the problem myself? This has been a road block for me. The OpenOffice bridges are part of the UNO framework. An

Re: Re issue 124599

On 04.04.2014 17:39, Andre Fischer wrote: On 04.04.2014 17:34, Andre Fischer wrote: On 04.04.2014 17:01, Andre Fischer wrote: Issue 124599 is the release blocker that requires a second RC. We have a bug fix, the patch is attached to the issue. Question is, how to proceed without Juergen to app

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 02.04.2014 17:12, imacat wrote: Traditional Chinese not found yet. Should I wait for a while? As Jürgen wrote, the Linux builds are still being uploaded. Languages starting with a-g are already available for 64bit Linux, other languages and 32bit Linux will follow in a couple of hours.

Re: Incubator still has SVN tree => to be removed in 72h

On 25.03.2014 12:50, Herbert Duerr wrote: [...] So if the next 72 hours indicate consensus on removing the incubator/ooo part of the repository I suggest that we should do so. The code history is already preserved in our git-import. Ok, the 72h period is up and we reached (lazy) consensus on

Re: How to write issue numbers in commit messages?

On 03/26/2014 11:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> In the last weeks I've seen different styles of how to write an issue >> number in the commit messages: >> #i123456# >> #123456# >> i123456 >> 123456 >> Does it still matter how it is written? Or is it always recognized >> corr

Re: AOO 4.1 Beta Survey Results

[...] Please describe the issue(s) you encountered. 1. [Mac OS 10.9.2 user] When I open old openoffice docs, it tells me that all fields cannot be opened, but it looks fine when it's opened. This was local problem of the machine that was used for creating the Beta 4.1 binaries for Mac. The pr

Re: Incubator still has SVN tree => to be removed in 72h

On 25.03.2014 13:07, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 25.03.2014 13:00, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: [...] So if the next 72 hours indicate consensus on removing the incubator/ooo part of the repository I suggest that we should do so. The code history is

Re: Incubator still has SVN tree => to be removed in 72h

On 25.03.2014 13:00, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: [...] So if the next 72 hours indicate consensus on removing the incubator/ooo part of the repository I suggest that we should do so. The code history is already preserved in our git-import. The only

Re: Incubator still has SVN tree => to be removed in 72h

On 24.03.2014 15:36, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 24.03.2014 15:13, sebb wrote: On 24 March 2014 13:51, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 23.03.2014 09:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: sebb wrote: There is still an SVN tree under Incubator: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ I assume this was

Re: Incubator still has SVN tree

On 24.03.2014 15:13, sebb wrote: On 24 March 2014 13:51, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 23.03.2014 09:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: sebb wrote: There is still an SVN tree under Incubator: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ I assume this was all transferred to the main ASF SVN area at

Re: Incubator still has SVN tree

On 23.03.2014 09:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: sebb wrote: There is still an SVN tree under Incubator: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ I assume this was all transferred to the main ASF SVN area at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ If so, please can someone tidy up the I

Be careful before the release

We're on a good way to a healthy AOO 4.1 release so we should avoid the pitfalls that prevented a timely AOO 4.1 Beta release. Let's examine this negative example a bit further, so we can all learn from it: A commit [1] stopped the Beta and forced the only respin that was needed despite the ma

Re: [Bug 124386] Improve Help for Version Selector

On 18.03.2014 14:54, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:05:31PM +0100, Herbert Duerr wrote: Since many entries in our bugzilla database are not about bugs, but about new features or enhancements I'd also like to use the term "issue" instead of "bug"

Fwd: [jira] [Resolved] (INFRA-7463) Customization for the OpenOffice bugzilla

Project: Infrastructure Issue Type: Wish Components: Infra Wishlist Reporter: Herbert Duerr Attachments: bugzilla.patch The field descriptions for issues in bugzilla are apparently not clear enough, so the OpenOffice project discussed some enhancement ideas on its d

Re: [Bug 124386] Improve Help for Version Selector

On 11.03.2014 23:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Herbert Duerr wrote: I'd also like to use the term "issue" instead of "bug", when Bugzilla refers to such an entry. I agree with the proposed changes in general, and it would be nice if Bugzilla still added automatic hy

Re: [Bug 124386] Improve Help for Version Selector

On 11.03.2014 20:38, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/11/2014 12:05 PM, schrieb Herbert Duerr: Members of our QA team requested a clarification of the "Version" field used in our bugzilla instance. There are other terms that could need some clarification too. [...] The help text for "o

Re: [Bug 124386] Improve Help for Version Selector

On 11.03.2014 13:01, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: Members of our QA team requested a clarification of the "Version" field used in our bugzilla instance. There are other terms that could need some clarification too. [...] Also the help text for

[Bug 124386] Improve Help for Version Selector

Members of our QA team requested a clarification of the "Version" field used in our bugzilla instance. There are other terms that could need some clarification too. So before I request ASF-Infra to change our bugzilla installation by using the patch [1], I'd like to ask for lazy consensus to r

Re: [Ticket#2014031010001921] Referenzkunde

Dear Tilman, many thanks for your very motivating feedback on our project and for volunteering as reference customer. I added you to the list of german reference customer with the detail you provided: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/de/marketing/referenzkunden.h

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta (RC)

On 06.03.2014 09:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta. The Beta release is intended to reach more early adopters and to receive more valuable feedback to improve potentially critical areas for

Re: Compiler warnings

On 05.03.2014 14:42, Andre Fischer wrote: Exception support does make object files larger and possibly a bit slower. The question is, is that significant? To put some actual data behind this: the exception handling tables in the libraries cost us about 20MB (on our current 64bit Linux build).

Re: Compiler warnings

On 05.03.2014 11:45, Andre Fischer wrote: On 05.03.2014 11:28, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote: On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote: The warning "expression has no effect" itself is interesting enough, just not in in list header. Fortunately terms

Re: Compiler warnings

On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote: On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote: The warning "expression has no effect" itself is interesting enough, just not in in list header. Fortunately terms like "list(1137)" can be filtered out easily. Please explain how that

Re: Compiler warnings

On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote: I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it is really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning messages. Some of these warnings are caused directly by code in sc but the majority of the warnings originate in heade

Fwd: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice Calc

Forwarding to our localization list. On 04.03.2014 09:50, Karol Łotocki wrote: jest: "WI*LE*KIE LITERY" powinno być: "WI*EL*KIE LITERY" Pozdrawiam, Karol Apparently the polish translation of the term "uppercase" has a typo that changes the meaning. The relevant pootle entry seems to be [1]

Re: [RELEASE]: first Beta RC ...

On 03.03.2014 18:15, Kay Schenk wrote: Will 32 bit Linux rpm be available any time soon? The sneak preview is already there [1], but because of the language-pack showstopper AOO410-beta-rc needs another round. [1] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/milestones/4.1.0-beta/binaries/en-US

Re: [RELEASE]: first Beta RC ...

On 03.03.2014 13:45, jan i wrote: Do we get ratscan log before the vote ? It already ran [1] and reported [2] no problems. [1] http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux64-rat/builds/97 [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html Herbert

[Bug 119006][Bug 123681] Restore windows problem on Mac OS X

Since the "OSX windows restore" problem is very popular in our forums, our mailing lists and in bugzilla I'd like to advertise my fix for that (rev 1571205) and invite testers. A build of the latest trunk with the fix is available at [1]. [1] http://people.apache.org/~hdu/AOO_Mac64_Test.dmg H

Re: [RELEASE]: New snapshot is ready

On 17.02.2014 20:37, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 02/17/2014 02:43 PM, schrieb Herbert Duerr: The development snapshot Wiki page is updated too, but due to server problems it is currently inaccessible. Just curious. How to update a Wiki page when the Wiki server is down? By updating it before it

[RELEASE]: New snapshot is ready

On 13.02.2014 17:08, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: the snapshot is still uploading but the wiki page is already updated and the links should now work when the upload is finished. Means if the link don't work yet try again some time later. Available languages are: ast bg cs da de el en-GB en-US es eu fi

Re: Any news on a new build of 64-bit MacOSX AOO 4.1 (either dayly/developer or snapshot build) ?

On 11.02.2014 15:23, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: On 11.02.2014 15:07, Herbert Duerr wrote: Please advise, whether you want all crash files from yesterday and where to put them (issue, make it downloadable, send it as an attachment?)! If you have webspace somewhere then making them

Re: Any news on a new build of 64-bit MacOSX AOO 4.1 (either dayly/developer or snapshot build) ?

Hi Rony, On 11.02.2014 14:47, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: On 11.02.2014 10:45, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: On 11.02.2014 09:55, Herbert Duerr wrote: [...] There are hints from other users that the crash after a while may have to do with the update service having problems. Does the

Re: Any news on a new build of 64-bit MacOSX AOO 4.1 (either dayly/developer or snapshot build) ?

Hi Rony, On 10.02.2014 21:14, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: A few remarks using yesterday's build: - If letting AOO 4.1 hang around with swriter (doing nothing), after approx. two minutes AOO crashes: do you need the DiagnosticReport file in case you cannot duplicate this? Yes please. T

Re: Any news on a new build of 64-bit MacOSX AOO 4.1 (either dayly/developer or snapshot build) ?

Hi Rony, On 10.02.2014 11:51, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: is there anywhere a new build of the 64-bit MacOSX AOO 4.1 available (beyond rev. 1560772)? No matter whether it is a (daily?) developer or an "official" snapshot. I just uploaded my last dev-build [1]. [1] http://people.apache.

Re: a mistake in drawingml.hxx?

On 10.02.2014 11:08, shzh zhao wrote: in oox\inc\oox\export\drawingml.hxx there is a line like "#include if you search 'escherex.hxx' ,you can find it in filter/inc/filter/msfilter. Yes, it was moved from svx to filter in October 2009 with issue 106421. can anyone fix this bug in the code b

Re: Solaris GCC or Sun Studio?

Hi Απόστολος, As far it regards Solaris,I have noticed that the building scripts of OpenOffice assume that one is building with Sun Studio. This compiler is a bit outdated and of course GCC is available for most platforms. Since LibreOffice has removed support for Sun Studio, I guess it would be

FreeBSD patches (was: New SNAPSHOT available (based on r1560772))

Hi Maho, On 02/05/2014 05:24 AM, Nakata Maho wrote: >> Questions: >> 1. subject says 1560772 but >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds >> >>says 1560773. Which is correct? Strictly speaking the new SNAPSHOT tag was created in r1560773. I

Re: Compilinng the gcc_solaris_intel bridge

Another reply to your fix in the Solaris bridge module. On 27.01.2014 17:04, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος wrote: After a number of efforts I have finally managed to find the proper patch for file bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_solaris_intel/uno2cpp.cxx and so to build a functional bridge for Solaris. Previ

Re: instsetoo_native need(s) to be rebuilt...

Hi Apostolos, On 01.02.2014 14:43, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος wrote: I have compiled all OpenOffice modules and now building stops as follows: ERROR: ERROR: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true 2>&1 | failed! in function: register_extensions [...] I have no idea what is wrong and

Re: OO 4.01 Compiled for Solaris 11 x86 Runtime Memory Fault

rg; a...@openoffice.apache.org; Herbert Duerr (h...@apache.org) Cc: Meffe, David K Subject: OO 4.01 Compiled for Solaris 11 x86 Runtime Memory Fault We've recently compiled OpenOffice 4.01 on Solaris 11 x86 and are experiencing the following at runtime. I've included some of the st

Re: Building on Mac

On 30.01.2014 09:40, Andre Fischer wrote: 1. Is it possible to build on OSX with only freely available tools (that don't require registration)? Apple's XCode development environment is available for free in either their app store or in their "downloads for developers" area. Apple requires a r

Re: New SNAPSHOT available (based on r1560772)

On 28.01.2014 18:35, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 27/01/2014 Herbert Duerr wrote: [2] http://people.apache.org/~hdu/developer-snapshots/snapshot/ I see that filenames look like Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_it.tar.gz Shouldn't they have a "m1" or some other

Re: 64bit Mac crashs often after start

Hi Raphael, On 01/29/2014 08:07 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > I recognise that the OSX 4.0.1 often crachs after start. It is not realy > reproducible, but I have the feeling that there is something wrong. I > just whant to let you know, so we can keep a eye on this. > > System: 10.9 Mavericks. >

Re: Compilinng the gcc_solaris_intel bridge

Hi Apostolos, On 27.01.2014 17:04, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος wrote: After a number of efforts I have finally managed to find the proper patch for file bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_solaris_intel/uno2cpp.cxx and so to build a functional bridge for Solaris. Previously, I could not build the testtools mod

New SNAPSHOT available (based on r1560772)

New snapshot builds based on the "feature freeze" revision (according to the release plan [1]) are available at [2]. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning [2] http://people.apache.org/~hdu/developer-snapshots/snapshot/ The development-snapshot CWiki

Re: Patch from r1554051 reverted

On 01/26/2014 10:41 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > A massive commit from Herbert from a couple days ago > http://svn.apache.org/r1560747 > overrides (reverts) a short configure.in patch I had applied on 29 > December: > http://svn.apache.org/r1554051 > > I assume this was not intentional (simply, th

Re: Problem with Java on the 64bit Mac OSX?

Hi Raphael, On 20.01.2014 13:35, Raphael Bircher wrote: I just started to test the 64 bit version of Mac OS X AOO. The Letter Wizard don't work at all. can someone confirm that? Fixed with [1] that will get into the next snapshot build, which will be out really soon (including 64bit Mac). Ple

Re: unoinfo-bug in latest MacOSX snapshot still present (Re: [RELEASE]: snapshot build for Mac and Windows based on revision

On 22.01.2014 20:17, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: Just downloaded the latest snapshot build for MacOSX (en-us, rev. 1556251) and found that the unoinfo-bug reported in is still present, preventing Java programs using "uninfo java" for

Re: Install error on nightly Windows build (r1560073)

Hi Rob, On 22.01.2014 17:56, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: [...] Apparently, as there is a knowledgebase article for that [1]. They recommend to run a tool [2] to fix it. This is odd, since this is a fresh VM image of Windows 7, with no other

Re: Install error on nightly Windows build (r1560073)

Hi Rob, On 22.01.2014 17:29, Rob Weir wrote: Installing on a clean Windows 7 64-bit image. I get an error when configuring Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable "Error 1935 An error occured during the installation of assembly 'policy.9.0.Microsoft.VC90.CRT,version="9.0.30729.6161 HRESU

  1   2   3   4   >