On 14.11.2014 01:04, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 11/13/2014 03:10 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 13/11/2014 Michal Hriň wrote:
[...]
It is a update of external package :)
And here is a problem, but it doesn't depend on you. Policy so far has
been: we download build-time dependencies from the Extensions site and
from Apache Extras.
Can we get a memory refresher on why we can't use the svn versions of
these external sources directly?
David Fisher wrote in [1] that he removed them because "fallback urls to
svn are now removed as per Infra policy". I guess the revision control
server that is so very critical to so many ASF projects should not be
impeded by the download of such large third-party tarballs.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1377529
[...]
It seems like the testing from the new SourceForge are is going pretty
well...
http://markmail.org/message/4p3klhqkkvszmwav
Maybe time for some additional testing from:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/
I'll make local changes and test with this as new OOO_EXTRAS area.
Who would have rights to update these files on SF?
The sourceforge ooextras.mirror project currently has only one
administrator [2].
[2] https://sourceforge.net/u/sf-editor1/
Herbert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
