Re: [BZ]How does vote function work

2012-11-06 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 06/11/2012 Ji Yan wrote: If "most voted" defect is feature request or enhancement, can we change its issue type to reflect its reality, so that we can still focus on the "most voted" defect. Sure. But most of them should already be classified correctly. Jan Iversen: It would at the same ti

Re: Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread Kevin Grignon
Rob, Beyond functional test and unit testing, can we perform some system testing, based on core usage scenarios? This is a great way to get more non-technical people involved. Validating the system's ability to realize our core usage scenarios is really important. This also means we need to cran

Mosaic Fun with OpenOffice Calc

2012-11-06 Thread imacat
Dear all, Here is the presentation and video given in today's talk "Mosaic Fun with OpenOffice Calc" (a.k.a. "How to Abuse OpenOffice"). I hope you like it. ^_*' The presentation: http://www.slideshare.net/imacat/mosaic-fun-with-openoffice-calc The OpenOffice Calc Style, full version: http:

Re: Uninstalling Open Office

2012-11-06 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2012-10-26 6:59 PM Dave Whitehouse wrote: > >> I wish to uninstall and then re-install Open Office. >> The reason is I am unable to open the Open Office because I have a >> drop-down box which tells me I need to 'restore windows of open off

Re: Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=you_can_help_us_improve > > If anyone has other ideas for the list of reasons to help with QA, let me > know. > > But in general it looks like we're ready to start a major recruitment > effort for

Re: Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread Donald Whytock
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:58 PM, jan iversen wrote: > This is a real nice page. > > Have we ever worked together with universities, at least in denmark, the > engineer and edp education contains quite a few 3weeks slots, where the > students are encouraged to seek projects outside the university, n

Re: Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread jan iversen
This is a real nice page. Have we ever worked together with universities, at least in denmark, the engineer and edp education contains quite a few 3weeks slots, where the students are encouraged to seek projects outside the university, normally in companies. Things like running QA on a snapshot o

Re: Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:53 AM, jan iversen wrote: > Nice pagewould it be helpfull if there was a bulleted list of examples > what the QA do, being QA is a quite wide field... > Added. -Rob > Jan. > > On 6 November 2012 17:44, Donald Whytock wrote: > >> Well, first of all you can take off

Re: Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 11/06/2012 05:49 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Donald Whytock wrote: Well, first of all you can take off the "(incubating)"...:) Yes, that should go. But I don't have permissions for that. I think we need at least a Roller admin (T.J ?) or Infra to help with that

Re: asking for your advice

2012-11-06 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:49 AM, 1000 et deux IDées <1000etdeuxid...@sfr.fr> wrote: > Dear Sir or Madam, > > As a business manager, I have created a working method based on Open Office > spreadsheets : do I have the right to sell this method to my clients via > Internet and on paper ? > Is this "wo

Re: Roller account request

2012-11-06 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andrea Pescetti wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 16:53:11 +0100: > Of course it took me until I got to the ApacheCon to realize that the > best way to share information with the community would be to blog about > what's happening here... > > Could anyone authorize my account "pescetti" to post art

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread jan iversen
I am not a deep makefile specialist, but the last project we worked on, had lines similar to what I wrote, and the process was just started once for all files on the line. in our case I would say: dMake genLang And that should cause dmake to start "genLang -m -t src1.hrc src2.xcd " I w

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread Andre Fischer
On 11/6/12 5:59 PM, jan iversen wrote: @andre: I just saw one line in your mail, that I forgot to respond toyou look for the interesting part of the code, the file tree scanner. There are no tree scanning with the new concept, it is done by the makefile. Each makefile (or build.lst) is ext

Re: Roller account request

2012-11-06 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Andrea, You have to sign up for a roller account first. Once that is done then either Marcus or I can invite you to the blog. Unless you do the sign up now, it will be 10 hours before I can help again. Regards, Dave On Nov 6, 2012, at 7:53 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Of course it took me

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread jan iversen
@andre: I just saw one line in your mail, that I forgot to respond toyou look for the interesting part of the code, the file tree scanner. There are no tree scanning with the new concept, it is done by the makefile. Each makefile (or build.lst) is extended with something like: genLang: src1

Re: Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread jan iversen
Nice pagewould it be helpfull if there was a bulleted list of examples what the QA do, being QA is a quite wide field... Jan. On 6 November 2012 17:44, Donald Whytock wrote: > Well, first of all you can take off the "(incubating)"...:) > > Other than that... > > - maybe expand SQE...Softwar

Re: Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Donald Whytock wrote: > Well, first of all you can take off the "(incubating)"...:) > Yes, that should go. But I don't have permissions for that. I think we need at least a Roller admin (T.J ?) or Infra to help with that. > Other than that... > > - maybe expand

Re: Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread Donald Whytock
Well, first of all you can take off the "(incubating)"...:) Other than that... - maybe expand SQE...Software Quality Engineer? - has ooo...@incubator.apache.org been migrated yet? Don On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=you_can

Draft Blog Post: You Can Help Us Improve OpenOffice by Helping Us Test

2012-11-06 Thread Rob Weir
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=you_can_help_us_improve If anyone has other ideas for the list of reasons to help with QA, let me know. But in general it looks like we're ready to start a major recruitment effort for QA. We can probably do something similar for localization so

Roller account request

2012-11-06 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Of course it took me until I got to the ApacheCon to realize that the best way to share information with the community would be to blog about what's happening here... Could anyone authorize my account "pescetti" to post articles to https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/ ? If any preliminary steps are t

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread jan iversen
HI Thanks for your input, it is not too harsh, I prefer straight comments than something I have to read several times to understand. I will not disturb your session, but I have put some reasons/answers below. rgds Jan I. On 6 November 2012 14:38, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 11/4/12 1:55 PM, jan

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread Andre Fischer
On 11/4/12 1:55 PM, jan iversen wrote: Hi. I have finished the control part of the new localization tool, and before I walk further down the line (writing/converting all the translations parts) I would like to have checked if the code is ok in terms of standard, readability and expectations (

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread jan iversen
On 6 November 2012 11:58, Dwayne Bailey wrote: > On 6 November 2012 10:25, jan iversen wrote: > > > I prefer .xlif because it is easier to handle, and I do not need to store > > information (like module/source file) in comments. > > > > You still need to store some reference right? > Yes, we in

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread Dwayne Bailey
On 6 November 2012 10:25, jan iversen wrote: > I prefer .xlif because it is easier to handle, and I do not need to store > information (like module/source file) in comments. > You still need to store some reference right? I think preference in some way should be decided by what people are doing

Re: proposal for new l10n workflow

2012-11-06 Thread jan iversen
Just to keep you all informed, that project plan has been updated and extended according to the latest request for change. Jan. http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO/workPlan On 30 October 2012 16:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 10/30/12 2:45 PM, jan iversen wrote: > > If my page n

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread jan iversen
I have made a description of a new workflow, where this code is only part of it. I do not know it you have seen otherwise here is a link: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO/new_proposal Jan. On 6 November 2012 10:54, Dwayne Bailey wrote: > On 4 November 2012 12:55, jan iversen w

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread jan iversen
I prefer .xlif because it is easier to handle, and I do not need to store information (like module/source file) in comments. However the issue is still open, and I think andrea/juergen will have a talk with you on that subject, and a couple of pootle server details during this week. thanks for co

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

2012-11-06 Thread Dwayne Bailey
On 4 November 2012 12:55, jan iversen wrote: > Hi. > > I have finished the control part of the new localization tool, and before > I walk further down the line (writing/converting all the translations > parts) I would like to have checked if the code is ok in terms of standard, > readability and

Re: CMS diff:

2012-11-06 Thread Shenfeng Liu
committed. Thanks for your update, Yan Ji! - Shenfeng Liu (Simon) 2012/11/6 Yan Ji > Clone URL (Committers only): > > https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://ooo-site.apache.org/stats%2Fdefects.txt > > Yan Ji > > Index: trunk/content/stats/defects.txt > ===