Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

I saw similar docker issues on Azure tests as well. I moved some tests to integration source sets in PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12274 Please take a look Thanks, Anurag Mantripragada > On Feb 13, 2025, at 1:36 AM, Péter Váry wrote: > > A late +1 - I just got to checking the s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

A late +1 - I just got to checking the signatures, checksum, finished building and running some tests. Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. febr. 13., Cs, 7:43): > Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for Release Apache Iceberg > 1.8.0 RC0. > > The vote result is:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0. The vote result is: +1: 6 (binding), 6 (non-binding) +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) Therefore, the release candidate is passed. On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:41 AM huaxin gao wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (non-binding) Verified signatures, checksums, build and ran some tests on my local. Thanks Amogh for driving the release! Best, Huaxin On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:28 AM Honah J. wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified signatures, checksum, build, and tests. > > Also noticed the same set of flaky

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (binding) Verified signatures, checksum, build, and tests. Also noticed the same set of flaky tests that Kevin reported. Thanks Amogh for driving this! Best regards, Honah On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:52 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified sigs/checksums/build/tests wit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (non-binding) - Checked signature/SHA512 - Ran RAT check - Ran tests on JDK17 Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Feb 12, 2025, at 9:52 AM, Eduard Tudenhöfner > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Verified sigs/checksums/build/tests with JDK17 > > I also saw the same TestS3FileIO failures that Kevin repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (binding) Verified sigs/checksums/build/tests with JDK17 I also saw the same *TestS3FileIO* failures that Kevin reported earlier (which passed on a subsequent run) and I do agree with Ryan that we may want to move Docker-specific tests to the *integrationTest* configuration. I opened #12236

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (binding) Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17) I also manually tested a number of cases with format v3 and DVs. -Dan On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:57 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > * validated checksum and signature > * checked license docs & ran RAT checks > * ran bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (non-binding) * validated checksum and signature * checked license docs & ran RAT checks * ran build and tests with JDK11 - Ajantha On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:37 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures/tests/licenses and plugged 1.8.0 into the CI of > PyIceberg

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (binding) Checked signatures/tests/licenses and plugged 1.8.0 into the CI of PyIceberg . Thanks for running this Amogh! Kind regards, Fokko Op wo 12 feb 2025 om 16:57 schreef Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>: > +1 (binding) > > - all si

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (binding) - all sigs/checksum/RAT checks - build and test with JDK17 - did some tests with Spark/DVs locally Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 7:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > I checked: > - hash and checksum are good > - all LICENSE and NOTICE are g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (non binding) I checked: - hash and checksum are good - all LICENSE and NOTICE are good (including the last fixes we did) - no binary file in the source distribution - ASF header is present in all expected files - I was able to build from the source distribution - I did quick tests with spark a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 * Validated signature and checksum * Ran RAT checks * Ran tests that didn't require Docker in Java 17 As a follow up, I think that we should move any tests that require Docker to integrationTest rather than test. We should try not to rely on Docker containers in normal unit tests because conta

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 (non binding) Checked signature, checksum, license, and tests. Had a few flaky tests running on M1 Mac, listed below. I reran the tests on ubuntu using github runners and it completed successfully. I also t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

+1 I verified signature, checksums, license, built and ran tests locally. Thanks for taking care of the release, Amogh! Thanks, Anurag On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 10:39 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache

[VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 RC0

Hi Everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 release. The commit ID is c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73 * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 * https://gi