+1 (binding) Verified signatures, checksum, build, and tests.
Also noticed the same set of flaky tests that Kevin reported. Thanks Amogh for driving this! Best regards, Honah On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:52 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified sigs/checksums/build/tests with JDK17 > > I also saw the same *TestS3FileIO* failures that Kevin reported earlier > (which passed on a subsequent run) and I do agree with Ryan that we may > want to move Docker-specific tests to the *integrationTest* > configuration. I opened #12236 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12236> for this. > > > Eduard > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:42 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17) >> >> I also manually tested a number of cases with format v3 and DVs. >> >> -Dan >> >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:57 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> * validated checksum and signature >>> * checked license docs & ran RAT checks >>> * ran build and tests with JDK11 >>> >>> - Ajantha >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:37 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Checked signatures/tests/licenses and plugged 1.8.0 into the CI of >>>> PyIceberg <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1633>. >>>> >>>> Thanks for running this Amogh! >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Fokko >>>> >>>> Op wo 12 feb 2025 om 16:57 schreef Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> - all sigs/checksum/RAT checks >>>>> - build and test with JDK17 >>>>> - did some tests with Spark/DVs locally >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 7:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> I checked: >>>>>> - hash and checksum are good >>>>>> - all LICENSE and NOTICE are good (including the last fixes we did) >>>>>> - no binary file in the source distribution >>>>>> - ASF header is present in all expected files >>>>>> - I was able to build from the source distribution >>>>>> - I did quick tests with spark and flink >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Amogh ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> Le lun. 10 févr. 2025 à 00:37, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>>> Iceberg 1.8.0 release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The commit ID is c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73 >>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1182/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 >>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>>>>>> encouraged to cast >>>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>>>> votes and more binding >>>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>
