I saw similar docker issues on Azure tests as well. I moved some tests to integration source sets in PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12274
Please take a look Thanks, Anurag Mantripragada > On Feb 13, 2025, at 1:36 AM, Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A late +1 - I just got to checking the signatures, checksum, finished > building and running some tests. > > Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com <mailto:2am...@gmail.com>> ezt írta > (időpont: 2025. febr. 13., Cs, 7:43): >> Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for Release Apache Iceberg >> 1.8.0 RC0. >> >> The vote result is: >> >> +1: 6 (binding), 6 (non-binding) >> +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) >> -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) >> >> Therefore, the release candidate is passed. >> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:41 AM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com >> <mailto:huaxin.ga...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Verified signatures, checksums, build and ran some tests on my local. >>> >>> Thanks Amogh for driving the release! >>> >>> Best, >>> Huaxin >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:28 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org >>> <mailto:hon...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Verified signatures, checksum, build, and tests. >>>> >>>> Also noticed the same set of flaky tests that Kevin reported. >>>> >>>> Thanks Amogh for driving this! >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Honah >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:52 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>>> <etudenhoef...@apache.org <mailto:etudenhoef...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> Verified sigs/checksums/build/tests with JDK17 >>>>> >>>>> I also saw the same TestS3FileIO failures that Kevin reported earlier >>>>> (which passed on a subsequent run) and I do agree with Ryan that we may >>>>> want to move Docker-specific tests to the integrationTest configuration. >>>>> I opened #12236 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12236> for this. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Eduard >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:42 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dwe...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17) >>>>>> >>>>>> I also manually tested a number of cases with format v3 and DVs. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Dan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:57 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com >>>>>> <mailto:ajanthab...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * validated checksum and signature >>>>>>> * checked license docs & ran RAT checks >>>>>>> * ran build and tests with JDK11 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Ajantha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:37 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:fo...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Checked signatures/tests/licenses and plugged 1.8.0 into the CI of >>>>>>>> PyIceberg <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1633>. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for running this Amogh! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>> Fokko >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Op wo 12 feb 2025 om 16:57 schreef Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> <mailto:2am...@gmail.com>>: >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - all sigs/checksum/RAT checks >>>>>>>>> - build and test with JDK17 >>>>>>>>> - did some tests with Spark/DVs locally >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 7:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>>> <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I checked: >>>>>>>>>> - hash and checksum are good >>>>>>>>>> - all LICENSE and NOTICE are good (including the last fixes we did) >>>>>>>>>> - no binary file in the source distribution >>>>>>>>>> - ASF header is present in all expected files >>>>>>>>>> - I was able to build from the source distribution >>>>>>>>>> - I did quick tests with spark and flink >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Amogh ! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le lun. 10 févr. 2025 à 00:37, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:2am...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.8.0 release. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The commit ID is c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73 >>>>>>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>>>>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1182/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members >>>>>>>>>>> are encouraged to cast >>>>>>>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>>>>>>>> votes and more binding >>>>>>>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes.
