+1 (binding) Verified sigs/checksums/build/tests with JDK17
I also saw the same *TestS3FileIO* failures that Kevin reported earlier (which passed on a subsequent run) and I do agree with Ryan that we may want to move Docker-specific tests to the *integrationTest* configuration. I opened #12236 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12236> for this. Eduard On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:42 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17) > > I also manually tested a number of cases with format v3 and DVs. > > -Dan > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:57 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> * validated checksum and signature >> * checked license docs & ran RAT checks >> * ran build and tests with JDK11 >> >> - Ajantha >> >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:37 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Checked signatures/tests/licenses and plugged 1.8.0 into the CI of >>> PyIceberg <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1633>. >>> >>> Thanks for running this Amogh! >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op wo 12 feb 2025 om 16:57 schreef Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> - all sigs/checksum/RAT checks >>>> - build and test with JDK17 >>>> - did some tests with Spark/DVs locally >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 7:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>> >>>>> I checked: >>>>> - hash and checksum are good >>>>> - all LICENSE and NOTICE are good (including the last fixes we did) >>>>> - no binary file in the source distribution >>>>> - ASF header is present in all expected files >>>>> - I was able to build from the source distribution >>>>> - I did quick tests with spark and flink >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Amogh ! >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> Le lun. 10 févr. 2025 à 00:37, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> a >>>>> écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>> Iceberg 1.8.0 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> The commit ID is c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73 >>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>> * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73 >>>>>> >>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>> * >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>> >>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>> >>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>> * >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1182/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>> >>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>>>>> encouraged to cast >>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>>> votes and more binding >>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>>> >>>>>
