+1 (non-binding)

Verified signatures, checksums, build and ran some tests on my local.

Thanks Amogh for driving the release!

Best,
Huaxin

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:28 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified signatures, checksum, build, and tests.
>
> Also noticed the same set of flaky tests that Kevin reported.
>
> Thanks Amogh for driving this!
>
> Best regards,
> Honah
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:52 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Verified sigs/checksums/build/tests with JDK17
>>
>> I also saw the same *TestS3FileIO* failures that Kevin reported earlier
>> (which passed on a subsequent run) and I do agree with Ryan that we may
>> want to move Docker-specific tests to the *integrationTest*
>> configuration. I opened #12236
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12236> for this.
>>
>>
>> Eduard
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:42 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17)
>>>
>>> I also manually tested a number of cases with format v3 and DVs.
>>>
>>> -Dan
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:57 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> * validated checksum and signature
>>>> * checked license docs & ran RAT checks
>>>> * ran build and tests with JDK11
>>>>
>>>> - Ajantha
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:37 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Checked signatures/tests/licenses and plugged 1.8.0 into the CI of
>>>>> PyIceberg <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1633>.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for running this Amogh!
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Fokko
>>>>>
>>>>> Op wo 12 feb 2025 om 16:57 schreef Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com
>>>>> >:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - all sigs/checksum/RAT checks
>>>>>> - build and test with JDK17
>>>>>> - did some tests with Spark/DVs locally
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 7:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I checked:
>>>>>>> - hash and checksum are good
>>>>>>> - all LICENSE and NOTICE are good (including the last fixes we did)
>>>>>>> - no binary file in the source distribution
>>>>>>> - ASF header is present in all expected files
>>>>>>> - I was able to build from the source distribution
>>>>>>> - I did quick tests with spark and flink
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Amogh !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le lun. 10 févr. 2025 à 00:37, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.8.0 release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The commit ID is c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73
>>>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>>>>>> repository URL is:
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1182/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.8.0
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members
>>>>>>>> are encouraged to cast
>>>>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>>>>>>>> votes and more binding
>>>>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Reply via email to