+1 (non-binding) - Checked signature/SHA512 - Ran RAT check - Ran tests on JDK17
Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Feb 12, 2025, at 9:52 AM, Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org> > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Verified sigs/checksums/build/tests with JDK17 > > I also saw the same TestS3FileIO failures that Kevin reported earlier (which > passed on a subsequent run) and I do agree with Ryan that we may want to move > Docker-specific tests to the integrationTest configuration. I opened #12236 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12236> for this. > > > Eduard > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:42 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org > <mailto:dwe...@apache.org>> wrote: >> +1 (binding) >> >> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17) >> >> I also manually tested a number of cases with format v3 and DVs. >> >> -Dan >> >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:57 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com >> <mailto:ajanthab...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> * validated checksum and signature >>> * checked license docs & ran RAT checks >>> * ran build and tests with JDK11 >>> >>> - Ajantha >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:37 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org >>> <mailto:fo...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Checked signatures/tests/licenses and plugged 1.8.0 into the CI of >>>> PyIceberg <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1633>. >>>> >>>> Thanks for running this Amogh! >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Fokko >>>> >>>> Op wo 12 feb 2025 om 16:57 schreef Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:2am...@gmail.com>>: >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> - all sigs/checksum/RAT checks >>>>> - build and test with JDK17 >>>>> - did some tests with Spark/DVs locally >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 7:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net >>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: >>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> I checked: >>>>>> - hash and checksum are good >>>>>> - all LICENSE and NOTICE are good (including the last fixes we did) >>>>>> - no binary file in the source distribution >>>>>> - ASF header is present in all expected files >>>>>> - I was able to build from the source distribution >>>>>> - I did quick tests with spark and flink >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Amogh ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> Le lun. 10 févr. 2025 à 00:37, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com >>>>>> <mailto:2am...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>>> Iceberg 1.8.0 release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The commit ID is c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73 >>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/c277c2014a1b37fe755cfe37f173b6465bb8cb73 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.0-rc0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository >>>>>>> URL is: >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1182/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.8.0 >>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>>>>>> encouraged to cast >>>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes >>>>>>> and more binding >>>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes.
