OK, I rushed through (mostly from memory) an update of that status page.
Give it a try and see if it works.
-Alex
On 7/22/15, 2:02 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Ah, crud. I forgot about that page. It is two years stale.
>
>Try working from the READMEs in the falcon and asjs repos. At least
>that’
This conversation probably deserves a new topic
Mike
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:10 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> >
> > >1) I’m looking to adapt the business logic part so it’ll cross-compile
> > >into Javascript, pretty much as-is. I expect to have to work on some of
> > >the capabilities
>
> >1) I’m looking to adapt the business logic part so it’ll cross-compile
> >into Javascript, pretty much as-is. I expect to have to work on some of
> >the capabilities and classes to make them cross-compilable. XML
> >processing is one example.
>
> Is there no way to convert to using JSON instea
We looked into using d.ts files, but then found it easier to use externs
from here:
https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/wiki/Externs-For-Common-Librarie
s
Easel is not on the list, but it might be possible for you to create it.
-Alex
On 7/22/15, 2:05 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Or this?
>https
Or this?
https://github.com/borisyankov/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/easeljs
On Jul 23, 2015, at 12:02 AM, Harbs wrote:
> You mean this?
> https://www.nuget.org/packages/easeljs.TypeScript.DefinitelyTyped/
>
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 11:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, if there is an extern
You mean this?
https://www.nuget.org/packages/easeljs.TypeScript.DefinitelyTyped/
On Jul 22, 2015, at 11:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Well, if there is an externs file for Easel, we can create the SWCs pretty
> easily and you won’t have to know learn about it.
Ah, crud. I forgot about that page. It is two years stale.
Try working from the READMEs in the falcon and asjs repos. At least
that’s only a year old.
-Alex
On 7/22/15, 1:53 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Well, I went through steps 1 through 6 here:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Fl
On 7/22/15, 1:49 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>On Jul 22, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/22/15, 1:36 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>>
>>> Makes sense.
>>>
>>> From my perspective, here’s what I’m looking to do:
>>>
>>> I have a rather large application which has a pretty clean divide
Well, I went through steps 1 through 6 here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS+Status
I got an error when trying to run ant on frameworks/as (I need that
local.properties file)
And the Falcon.jx failed as well. No idea why.
I’m finished for the day. I’ll give this a go aga
On Jul 22, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/22/15, 1:36 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> Makes sense.
>>
>> From my perspective, here’s what I’m looking to do:
>>
>> I have a rather large application which has a pretty clean divide between
>> business logic and view.
>>
>> 1) I’m lo
On 7/22/15, 1:39 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>This is what I’m counting on. I could use some help getting started
>though.
>
>If someone can help me with the baby steps, I’m sure I’ll be up to
>walking and running in no time… ;-)
Well, grab the repo, and see if the README can get you to the point of
co
On 7/22/15, 1:36 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Makes sense.
>
>From my perspective, here’s what I’m looking to do:
>
>I have a rather large application which has a pretty clean divide between
>business logic and view.
>
>1) I’m looking to adapt the business logic part so it’ll cross-compile
>into Javascr
This is what I’m counting on. I could use some help getting started though.
If someone can help me with the baby steps, I’m sure I’ll be up to walking and
running in no time… ;-)
On Jul 22, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> For sure, there are lots of bugs and missing features so you won’
ect
>> / 1 build configuration in IntelliJ) as soon as COMPILE:JS and COMPILE:AS3
>> were defined to AUTO which would eliminate the need to define the js output
>> type as I could infer it.
>>> Anyway, I guess this would deserve another wiki page than the one
>> mentioned before.
>>>
>&
MPILE:JS and COMPILE:AS3 were defined to AUTO which would eliminate
>>the need to define the js output type as I could infer it.
>> Anyway, I guess this would deserve another wiki page than the one
>>mentioned before.
>>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>>
AS3
> were defined to AUTO which would eliminate the need to define the js output
> type as I could infer it.
> > Anyway, I guess this would deserve another wiki page than the one
> mentioned before.
> >
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >
> > --
ed to define the js output type as I
> could infer it.
> Anyway, I guess this would deserve another wiki page than the one mentioned
> before.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
>> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>> From:
Frédéric THOMAS
----
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> From: harbs.li...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:50:02 +0300
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> This discussion was incredibly long and I had trouble following how to get
> going.
>
> I
This discussion was incredibly long and I had trouble following how to get
going.
I’m trying to set myself up with FlexJS for the first time. I’d like to figure
out how I can develop working off the repo so I can work on the SDK while I go.
Since I’m first starting with FlexJS, I’d like to try
Hi,
I checked in the intellij-config.xml, it should be available in the next
nightly, thanks @Alex for having taken care of the other missing files :-)
Thanks also @Mike for having re-posted the how-to.
Here is what remains to do for the user when it wants to configure a project
for FlexJS in
Thanks for trying, what is the size of the fdb.jar in your \lib
folder ?
Also, make sure in intelliJ, yout module / compiler options / module defaults,
you unticked the default language and added -load-config+=\ide\IDEA\intellij-config.xml
I just tried with the last asjs build and it worked wel
Oups,
To be exact I wasn't able to use the debugger because it didn't compile :)
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:00:55 +0100
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
>
, see http://snag.gy/u9r5O.jpg
Did I miss something ?
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 18:26:38 -0700
> From: kevin.god...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>
> Alex, you were right! I can't find your original comment
> should.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46756.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
ating the version number before adding it to IJ as an sdk, IJ will
use the flexJS sdk debugger without trying to apply its patch. So, in the
debugger settings, I can set it to use the flexJS sdk and it debugs as it
should.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.23
n old version of flex like 4.0. Sorry that I did not catch this
> earlier.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46747.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
OK, cool, so using a higher version number in the installer should allow
IJ to work with FDB.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 5/19/15, 6:26 PM, "kevin.godell" wrote:
>Alex, you were right! I can't find your original comment, but I remember
>you
>telling me that I should try changing the version in the
>flex-s
47.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46747.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
FlexJS nightly
2015年5月18日月曜日、Alex Haruiさんは書きました:
> Looks like you guys were busy today. Sorry I couldn’t join in sooner.
>
> On 5/17/15, 2:23 PM, "Héctor A" >
> wrote:
>
> >I see nothing strange on flex-config.xml, so I guess FD may not be
> >resolving the path to it correctly in some place.
>
>
Looks like you guys were busy today. Sorry I couldn’t join in sooner.
On 5/17/15, 2:23 PM, "Héctor A" wrote:
>I see nothing strange on flex-config.xml, so I guess FD may not be
>resolving the path to it correctly in some place.
If you aborted the install, all bets are off. I just tried using
> > > the
> > > > > > full
> > > > > > > > build to complete.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, May
gt; wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > @Michael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > How did you solve the jburg problem? Because it failed for me
> > all
> > > > the
> > > > > > > times
> > > > > > > > I tried too.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Michael Schmalle <
> > > > > > > > teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am trying to build the installer.xml from the nightly, it
> > keeps
> > > > > > > failing
> > > > > > > > > when trying to download the jburg.jar, has anybody else had
> > this
> > > > > > > problem?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:51 AM, piotrz <
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Wow! Massive Mike!!! <3 Waiting for details! :)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > Apache Flex PMC
> > > > > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46502.html
> > > > > > > > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list
> archive
> > at
> > > > > > > > Nabble.com.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
t; > > > > > How did you solve the jburg problem? Because it failed for me
> all
> > > the
> > > > > > times
> > > > > > > I tried too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:55 PM
otigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am trying to build the installer.xml from the nightly, it
keeps
> > > > > failing
> > > > > > > when trying to download the jburg.jar, has anybody else had
this
> > > > > problem?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:51 AM, piotrz <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Wow! Massive Mike!!! <3 Waiting for details! :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > Apache Flex PMC
> > > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46502.html
> > > > > > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive
at
> > > > > > Nabble.com.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
trying to build the installer.xml from the nightly, it
> keeps
> > > > > failing
> > > > > > > when trying to download the jburg.jar, has anybody else had
> this
> > > > > problem?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:51 AM, piotrz <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Wow! Massive Mike!!! <3 Waiting for details! :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > Apache Flex PMC
> > > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46502.html
> > > > > > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> > > > > > Nabble.com.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
eps
> > > > failing
> > > > > > when trying to download the jburg.jar, has anybody else had this
> > > > problem?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:51 AM, piotrz <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wow! Massive Mike!!! <3 Waiting for details! :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > Apache Flex PMC
> > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46502.html
> > > > > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> > > > > Nabble.com.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
his
> > > problem?
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:51 AM, piotrz >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Wow! Massive Mike!!! <3 Waiting for details! :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > Apache Flex PMC
> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46502.html
> > > > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> > > > Nabble.com.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
;
> > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:51 AM, piotrz >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Wow! Massive Mike!!! <3 Waiting for details! :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > Apache Flex PMC
> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46502.html
> > > > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> > > > Nabble.com.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
.jar, has anybody else had this
> > problem?
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:51 AM, piotrz
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Wow! Massive Mike!!! <3 Waiting for details! :)
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:51 AM, piotrz
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Wow! Massive Mike!!! <3 Waiting for details! :)
> > > >
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > &
; > > Apache Flex PMC
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46502.html
> > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
>
; > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46502.html
> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
Aye, I guess I was reading his original post too directly, well anyway
doesn't matter, whatever is decided with I will roll on.
Actually running FalconJX unit tests and it feels like a really weird
dejavu.
Mike
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/16/15, 6:54 AM, "Mich
On 5/16/15, 6:54 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>@Alex
>
>I am still totally interested in FlexJS, I can only imagine how Josh's UI
>framework could totally add to the validity of a developer taking the next
>step into a full fledged UI/Application framework like FlexJS.
>
>On that note, my in
Not lately. I'll check them out.
- Josh
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/15/15, 5:13 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>
> >On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Michael Schmalle
> > >> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If I knew people like you were getting interested in these projects, I
@Josh
Just to add, the most practical situation would be, you prototype your
basic framework using the library you need. Write the javascript that way
it fits into the framework you are using, find the dependencies and
irregularities early.
Once you have a hello world type prototype, I can then
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Michael Schmalle <
> teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> >
> > If I knew people like you were getting interested in these projects, I
> know
> > it's a catalyst for me because I met you back in 2005-2006(
On 5/15/15, 5:13 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Michael Schmalle
>> wrote:
>
>>
>> If I knew people like you were getting interested in these projects, I
>>know
>> it's a catalyst for me because I met you back in 2005-2006(can't
>>remember),
>> right when AIR(Apollo
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>
> If I knew people like you were getting interested in these projects, I know
> it's a catalyst for me because I met you back in 2005-2006(can't remember),
> right when AIR(Apollo) was released at the Adobe component developer
> summit. I
Josh,
You ARE the reason I am on this list right now from 2 years away. Your
Feathers framework proves how well ActionScript "doesn't" get in the way of
making an app quick.
I was able in about 2 days to pick it up and get something going with my
audio stuff.
That said, Alex and Erik did a lo(mo
Why would someone pick ActionScript over TypeScript? I have ten years of
experience with ActionScript. If I were to switch away from Flash/AIR
today, I'd prefer to keep using the same language and focus on learning new
libraries (whether with a framework like FlexJS or lower-level DOM). It's
signif
Hmm, yeah ok that looks interesting.
I don't know as Alex said what is the benefit??? Who knows. :)
I know from mid 2012 to mid 2013 I did a huge amount of compiler work for
Apache and Randori, I know what AS can do going to JS, it was quite fun.
Mike went to quite a few conferences and from the
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 5/15/15, 12:35 PM, "Michael Schmalle"
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >FlexJS does massive more since it does CSS, MXML States etc. But that
> > >compiler in the repo right no
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/15/15, 12:35 PM, "Michael Schmalle"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >FlexJS does massive more since it does CSS, MXML States etc. But that
> >compiler in the repo right now can do what you mentioned already.
>
> Josh’s idea is interesting. In both
On 5/15/15, 12:35 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>FlexJS does massive more since it does CSS, MXML States etc. But that
>compiler in the repo right now can do what you mentioned already.
Josh’s idea is interesting. In both Randori and FlexJS, the transpiler is
buried in the package. I think
JS libs and
being able to build in IntelliJ modular applications as we do in Flex.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: joshtynj...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:28:37 -0700
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> I had heard of Randori, but I rem
e seen
> > recently.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > - We overlay ourself the FlexJS SDK on top of the FlexSDK, we
> > deliver
> > >> it
> > >> > > like that and make think IJ that's a flex SDK (
top of the FlexSDK, we
> deliver
> >> it
> >> > > like that and make think IJ that's a flex SDK (that was a bit my
> >> previous
> >> > > answer), in this case, we could have I guess most of the IDE goodies
> >> > >
x SDK and this facet does the job of
>> > > overlaying the FlexSDK with FlexJS an plug the FlexJS compilation
>> > workfow,
>> > > etc.. into the IDE, create some wizards, etc..., that still means the
>> > user
>> > > will create a Flex Project before apply
h
> > >
> > > - We create a Facet for the FlexMojo in the same way Jangaroo does for
> > its
> > > maven plugin and this facet take care of the FlexJS compilation workfow
> > into
> > > the IDE, create some wizards, etc..., that still means the user will
> &
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/15/15, 11:26 AM, "Michael Schmalle"
> wrote:
> >
> >What I want to do in the next couple months is test the crap out of all
> >the
> >base UI components and make sure they work, JUST WORK from as to in the
> >browser.
>
> That would b
jo in the same way Jangaroo does for
> its
> > maven plugin and this facet take care of the FlexJS compilation workfow
> into
> > the IDE, create some wizards, etc..., that still means the user will
> > create a Maven Project before applying the facet though
> >
> > -
On 5/15/15, 11:26 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>What I want to do in the next couple months is test the crap out of all
>the
>base UI components and make sure they work, JUST WORK from as to in the
>browser.
That would be awesome. Be prepared, you’ll find lots of issues.
>Well, that is my
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
>
> Overall, I think FlexJS is going in the right direction. We just need to
> keep at it and create a minimum viable product and keep making regular
> releases. By the time we are ready, I believe AngularJS and React would
> have prim
7;t need to do that.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 18:41:45 +
>
>
>
> On 5/15/15, 11:31 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
> >> I guess I am hoping
Looking at the direction in which the major frameworks are moving towards,
it seems like FlexJS (or even Flex itself) has been the best approach all
along.
Google's AngularJS 2.0 is using Webcomponents to create MXML like
declarative components [1]. Facebook's React is using JSX to do the same
[2
lugin
And I'm pretty sure it would require a hudge amount of time to convert it to
something that can be used with FJS now.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:04:13 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apa
On 5/15/15, 11:31 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> I guess I am hoping there is one more scenario where we put the right
>> files and data in a FlexJS release that IntelliJ thinks it is a Flex SDK
>> without it actually being a Flex SDK. I don’t know what a Facet is or
>> what goes in a Randori
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 17:58:58 +
>
> I guess I am hoping there is one more scenario where we put the right
> files and data in a FlexJS release that IntelliJ thinks it is a Flex SDK
&g
That's just it, we live in a stereotypical world, where it's not fair but
it's the truth and we have to play that game.
IMHO, changing the name of something has no effect on the validity of the
technology. FlexJS will succeed because it solves a problem and solves it
well.
I really don't know why
On 5/15/15, 11:04 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>I know the whole open source mantra, but it would be nice to work on
>something that gets used by people. FlexJS is another question mark
>because
>on top of the technology transforming things and not just HTML/JS
>framework, you have to wipe the
Project before applying the facet though
>
> - We don't base anything on the FlexSDK, we need a plugin like Randori.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:53:46 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > From: teotigraphix.
lexJS compilation
>workfow into
>the IDE, create some wizards, etc..., that still means the user will
>create a Maven Project before applying the facet though
>
>- We don't base anything on the FlexSDK, we need a plugin like Randori.
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>> Date: F
plugin like Randori.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:53:46 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> @Alex
>
> https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-116986
>
> Been there, done that
@Alex
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-116986
Been there, done that.
> BTW, I would hope that better integration with IntelliJ doesn’t require a
whole Randori-like plug in.
Considering how much time Fred etal put into that "project", I doubt there
is enough time to get even close to wh
jetbrains issue tracking for the FlexJS issue
but he said he had a look but hadn't got the time to read it all.
Also, that's 1 year or so now, I can see almost no effort anymore pushed into
Flex from Jetbrains :(
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apa
On 5/15/15, 9:03 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>It was a revert of the previous commit because I used IntelliJ the code
>cleanup function which touched all the files, the following commit
>59659f7cc66a20a9450d4a3117a5f999f1fa41c7 shows that only DebugCLI and
>Extensions was touched.
>
>In this
On 5/15/15, 8:54 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> Regarding the file location in FDB, I wasn’t sure you had time to work
>>on
>> it so I didn’t mention it. But if you have time that would be great.
>> IMO, it doesn’t require a JIRA issue to track it if you have the fix
>>ready.
>
>You can now d
correlation
with the last version because it couldn't determinate it.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 15:35:59 +
>
> Fred,
>
> Which classes in flex-falcon are in
line 8
(fdb) c
Breakpoint 1, Main() at Main.as:8
8 var textField:TextField = new TextField();
(fdb) c
[trace] Hello, world!
q
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 15:35:59 +00
d on
>Falcon classes will be created in the Falcon repository.
>I re-applied previous fixes we had of FDB
>
>So, it seems there were some falcon dependencies.
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [Fl
seems there were some falcon dependencies.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 15:53:01 +0100
>
>
>
>
> > I didn’t think there was a different debugger cod
yes, in this case I forgot to look for the file location.
What do you want to do, raise a bug for the record or you prefer I commit the
fix directly ?
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Dat
t succeed. So, I
will do my part to contribute to that success.
End transmission...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46580.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 5/15/15, 5:31 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>It seems I've been wrong here, I didn't get well the context and I was
>missing data, I thougt FDB in Falcon was the donated version, it seems to
>be wrong and FDB is only a copy of the one in the Flex SDK, right ?
>
>If I'm correct, wh
elliJ, I can set the
debugger I want to use, I tried with the one in FlexJS and the one in my old
4.10, they both work well.
Anyway, I fixed the remaining open bug in FDB relative to worker last night.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Sub
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46576.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
w IntelliJ user, I am not sure what to expect
from that feature.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46576.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 5/14/15, 8:03 PM, "kevin.godell" wrote:
>Is there any arg that can be passed to /bin/mxmlc to have the swf output
>into
>a different directory? Its not really a big deal, but when I run the
>external tool and create the swf, it is output into the src directory,
>along
>side with the mxml fil
ut of time for tonight. Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp46486p46573.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t;> For example, IIRC, I guess it was ExpressionCache, is not used anymore
> >>by
> >> Falcon FDB, one of the reason I wasn't able to integrate directly the
> >>last
> >> given code for FDB into the Flex SDK but had to change the classes it
> >>used
>
>>by
>> Falcon FDB, one of the reason I wasn't able to integrate directly the
>>last
>> given code for FDB into the Flex SDK but had to change the classes it
>>used
>> to evaluate expressions before to patch the CLI and I kept a branch of
>>the
>> origin
S
>
> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 20:06:53 +0100
> >
> > > The debugger exception others are seeing seem to be related to changes
> > > made to suppo
Anyway, I will still try a recent FDB version to see if there any differences.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 20:06:53 +0100
>
> > The debugger exception others
guess the
> problem come from that, IDEA-FIX to Faclon Debugger, instead of Flex SDK
> Debugger, same for the compiler, Alexander should be able to tell us more
> though.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject:
s a long time but I guess the
problem come from that, IDEA-FIX to Faclon Debugger, instead of Flex SDK
Debugger, same for the compiler, Alexander should be able to tell us more
though.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integra
On 5/14/15, 10:20 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
>Yes, the reason why before to write a wiki, I would like some others to
>try both of the approaches and have feedback on what is the more
>convenient, I would like to have the Alex point of view too as he has the
>large picture.
IMO, this is all
what am I missing ?
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 18:34:00 +0100
>>
>> I'm using he FlexJS nightly of last week, so, I guess n
On 5/14/15, 10:34 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>I'm using he FlexJS nightly of last week, so, I guess nothing is needed,
>also, any FlexSDK as base SDK seems to work, I've been using a 4.10
The debugger exception others are seeing seem to be related to changes
made to support AS Workers, so it
On 5/14/15, 10:26 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>I haven't used the Flex SDK really much but, it obviously works or people
>would have complained years ago.
>
>@Alex, I take it a lot of the examples are broken, I have tried a couple
>and things like alert.show() has wrong parameters and such, A
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
