And you can see; https://github.com/RandoriAS/randori-libraries
We had a huge amount of shims for frameworks that "just worked" and compiled to javascript. Mike On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com > wrote: > @Josh We already had it. The Randori project and Randori compiler was a > straight transpiler. > > See; https://github.com/RandoriAS/randori-compiler > > Nice to see you in the conversation. :) > > Mike > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> In my opinion, a separate product that is simply an ActionScript to >> JavaScript transpiler with direct access to browser APIs like the DOM >> would >> be a smart idea. It would help establish the idea that ActionScript isn't >> only for Flash and SWFs. Developers would see that ActionScript can be >> used >> similar to TypeScript or CoffeeScript to transpile to JavaScript from a >> more appealing language. In other words, ActionScript will be shown to be >> evolving in the same direction as other innovative web technologies. >> >> From there, I think it would be easier to convince developers to consider >> the full FlexJS SDK because it can be presented as being built with this >> same transpiler technology that has already separated itself from being >> strictly used with Flash. >> >> - Josh >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Michael Schmalle < >> teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Fred, I didn't mean to contradict anything you said. I just know the >> 100's >> > of hours you rput into the Randori plugin and I don't want to sound >> like I >> > am over stepping bounds on anything I say. >> > >> > Honestly, I thought the whole Randori thing with IOC and it's easy >> > framework might actually get used, I had it documented over the span of >> 5-6 >> > months I put in about 600+ hours on FalconJX and the whole Randori >> compiler >> > and rbl stuff. >> > >> > What I am saying is really for my own personal security, for some >> reason I >> > thought Randori might actually translate into work, after it failed >> > miserably and all the hours I had invested, I seriously was about to >> quit >> > programing and dig ditches. :) >> > >> > I know the whole open source mantra, but it would be nice to work on >> > something that gets used by people. FlexJS is another question mark >> because >> > on top of the technology transforming things and not just HTML/JS >> > framework, you have to wipe the idea out of peoples head this IS NOT >> Flash >> > and Adobe, it's ActionScript and MXML, a design pattern, just like all >> the >> > other frameworks an automated tools out there for JavaScript currently. >> > >> > Anyway. >> > >> > Mike >> > >> > >> > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Frédéric THOMAS < >> webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Well, it seems the in last 2 answers (Mike and myself), there is a >> > > contradiction, actually there is not, there are only few scenarios for >> > > IntelliJ IMO >> > > >> > > - We don't do anything particular and we use FlexJS as a lib on top of >> > the >> > > Flex SDK an we have a not user friendly setup as we've seen recently. >> > > >> > > - We overlay ourself the FlexJS SDK on top of the FlexSDK, we deliver >> it >> > > like that and make think IJ that's a flex SDK (that was a bit my >> previous >> > > answer), in this case, we could have I guess most of the IDE goodies >> > > working, not ideal at all but better. >> > > >> > > - We create a Facet for the Flex SDK and this facet does the job of >> > > overlaying the FlexSDK with FlexJS an plug the FlexJS compilation >> > workfow, >> > > etc.. into the IDE, create some wizards, etc..., that still means the >> > user >> > > will create a Flex Project before applying the facet though >> > > >> > > - We create a Facet for the FlexMojo in the same way Jangaroo does for >> > its >> > > maven plugin and this facet take care of the FlexJS compilation >> workfow >> > into >> > > the IDE, create some wizards, etc..., that still means the user will >> > > create a Maven Project before applying the facet though >> > > >> > > - We don't base anything on the FlexSDK, we need a plugin like >> Randori. >> > > >> > > Frédéric THOMAS >> > > >> > > > Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:53:46 -0400 >> > > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com >> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > >> > > > @Alex >> > > > >> > > > https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-116986 >> > > > >> > > > Been there, done that. >> > > > >> > > > > BTW, I would hope that better integration with IntelliJ doesn’t >> > > require a >> > > > whole Randori-like plug in. >> > > > >> > > > Considering how much time Fred etal put into that "project", I doubt >> > > there >> > > > is enough time to get even close to what we had. >> > > > >> > > > It's not a question of if you should, it's something that speeds up >> > > > development. I agree in one respect that before I spent any time on >> an >> > > > extras for workflow enhancement, the framework needs to be used by >> more >> > > > than the developers, my total mistake with the whole Randori >> project. >> > > > >> > > > I'm not making any mistakes this time because I am using my hobby >> time, >> > > > psychologically it's different for me that it's just a fun thing to >> do >> > > > right now. I needed a little project that would challenge my mind >> and >> > > > programming skills compared to what I do on mobile right now, it's >> just >> > > > plain work. >> > > > >> > > > Mike >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 5/15/15, 9:03 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >It was a revert of the previous commit because I used IntelliJ >> the >> > > code >> > > > > >cleanup function which touched all the files, the following >> commit >> > > > > >59659f7cc66a20a9450d4a3117a5f999f1fa41c7 shows that only DebugCLI >> > and >> > > > > >Extensions was touched. >> > > > > > >> > > > > >In this case, it could be that because the IJ Flex Plugin >> reconized >> > > the >> > > > > >FlexJS SDK as a Flex SDK, it applied a fix it had for FDB that >> > wasn't >> > > in >> > > > > >correlation with the last version because it couldn't determinate >> > it. >> > > > > >> > > > > Ah yes, I see that now. I wonder if there is some other >> explanation >> > > for >> > > > > the FaultActions exception? The window where FaultActions was >> > changed >> > > was >> > > > > small. Anyway if folks have it working then it doesn’t matter. >> > > > > >> > > > > BTW, I would hope that better integration with IntelliJ doesn’t >> > > require a >> > > > > whole Randori-like plug in. Falcon should be able to swap in for >> > MXMLC >> > > > > with fewer changes. >> > > > > >> > > > > I did notice that Alexander Doroshko is watching the FDB bug. I >> was >> > > going >> > > > > to suggest to you that you put in a comment on that bug asking >> him to >> > > > > participate on this thread. Or didn’t somebody file a feature >> > request >> > > in >> > > > > IntelliJ’s bug base asking for FlexJS support? Maybe we should >> put >> > in >> > > a >> > > > > comment on there. >> > > > > >> > > > > -Alex >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >
