On 5/15/15, 9:03 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:


>It was a revert of the previous commit because I used IntelliJ the code
>cleanup function which touched all the files, the following commit
>59659f7cc66a20a9450d4a3117a5f999f1fa41c7 shows that only DebugCLI and
>Extensions was touched.
>
>In this case, it could be that because the IJ Flex Plugin reconized the
>FlexJS SDK as a Flex SDK, it applied a fix it had for FDB that wasn't in
>correlation with the last version because it couldn't determinate it.

Ah yes, I see that now.  I wonder if there is some other explanation for
the FaultActions exception?  The window where FaultActions was changed was
small.  Anyway if folks have it working then it doesn’t matter.

BTW, I would hope that better integration with IntelliJ doesn’t require a
whole Randori-like plug in.  Falcon should be able to swap in for MXMLC
with fewer changes.

I did notice that Alexander Doroshko is watching the FDB bug.  I was going
to suggest to you that you put in a comment on that bug asking him to
participate on this thread.  Or didn’t somebody file a feature request in
IntelliJ’s bug base asking for FlexJS support?  Maybe we should put in a
comment on there.

-Alex
                                          

Reply via email to