moving your RC3 svn tag?
>
> br,
> Matt
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> These are the curren
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> We had an RC3 vote so shouldn't remove; but I'm very happy if you've
>> time to do an RC4. I've been managing about enough time to look at the
>&
+1.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely:
>
> 1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component
> 1a. Grant Commons karma to Dave Brosius (dbrosius)
>
> 2. Accept JCS [2] as Commons component
> 2a. Grant Commons k
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> I understand the concern (though s/Thorsten/Torsten/).
>
> I have given up on correcting people.
> No idea why so many people believe it needs a "h" ;-)
>
> As for the matter... I am not keen on the move but - whatever.
> Is there a script
There is no planned release date.
We release when the release is ready and there's currently one
blocking API issue regarding the text.translate package.
Once that issue is resolved then another release candidate can be
proposed; currently no one is working on the issue though.
Hen
On Fri, Jul
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> *grumbles that they were ints and a previous RC candidate saw it
>> change to Range* :)
>>
>
>
> Change it back! ;)
Tongue in cheek as it mi
o get some time back.
Hen
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> We had an RC3 vote so shouldn't remove; but I'm very happy if you'v
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Community activity decreased since codebase has been imported &
> polished; we finally reached Luc Blanchard, the other OGNL original
> author, that signed & submitted the OGNL SoftwareGrant & ICLA - we
> also voted him as a new committer s
>From the 3.0 javadoc:
"Note that unicode characters greater than 0x7f are as of 3.0, no
longer escaped. "
Not that informative on how to fix it I know. Here's the latest,
unpublished javadoc:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC3/site/apidocs/org/apache/commons/lang3/StringEsca
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> I think we're ready for another release candidate.
>>
>> Does anyone know of any remaining items? JIRA is clean, and I don't
>> see anything in the email thre
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 2:37, "Jörg Schaible" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 2:05, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011
Heads up that I plan to tag and build an RC4 tomorrow.
Commit now, or raise your hand if you need me to delay.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.ap
I'm assuming this is Commons Math. I've added a [math] so it catches
the interest of those involved.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Greg Sterijevski
wrote:
> Additionally, I pass all of the Wampler beta estimates.
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Greg Sterijevski
> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
> On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> 1/ FastDateFormat
>> The date format " yyy yy y" is formatted with JDK 7 as "2003 2003 03
>> 2003" instead of "2003 03 03 03". So, should FastDateFormat follow the JDK
>> in any case an
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> 2/ UnicodeUnescaper
> Since JDK 1.7 "\u+" is a valid Unicode representation. The
> UnicodeUnescaper defines the OPTION "escapePlus" that allows also this plus
> character for all runtime versions i.e. currently the OPTION is superfluous
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne
>> wrote:
>>> On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>>> 1/ FastDateFormat
>>>> The date format "
Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
RC4 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
Website:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Am 14.07.2011 21:01, schrieb Matt Benson:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>
>>> I recall seeing traffic in the
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>
>> RC4 is available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>
>> SVN:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> The build runs fine for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts
> look good.
>
> I was wondering why the binary distribution does not contain jars for the
> sources and javadocs, but this is probably not necessary because the
> artifa
emove my
> -1 :)
>
> Gary
>
>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
>>> i
gt;>
>>> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
>>> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
>> builds before my commit.
>&
Vote passes [!]
6 +1s.
Gary Gregory
Matt Benson
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Stephen Colebourne
and my own implicit +1.
I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
Hen
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Lang is rea
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Vote passes [!]
>
> 6 +1s.
>
> Gary Gregory
> Matt Benson
> Oliver Heger
> Jörg Schaible
> Stephen Colebourne
> and my own implicit +1.
>
> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a r
ote:
>>> >> >> > StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If
>>> its
>>> >> >> > been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for
>>> >> >> > testing)
>>> >> >> >
>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Vote passes [!]
>>
>> 6 +1s.
>>
>> Gary Gregory
>> Matt Benson
>> Oliver Heger
>> Jörg Schaible
>> Stephen Colebourn
So you're not saying that we have to escape > 0x7f (old behaviour),
but that we have to escape any supplementary characters?
Hen
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I am glad to know there is a 3.0 way of doing that, which is:
>
> @Test
> public void testEsca
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> Vote passes [!]
>>>>
&g
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandel
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 July 2011 20:12, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz
>>>> wrot
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Commons Lang 3.0
Commons Lang is JDK 1.5+ and has updated the API to support Java 5
features, such as generics and varargs. Deprecated parts of the API
have been removed.
This is NOT a backwards compatible release. Because of this, we
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> Vote passes [!]
>>>
>>> 6 +1s.
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory
>>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> Vote passes [!]
>>&
I think the argument is the other way. You should be explaining why
you wouldn't simply just move to Java 5.
+1 to JDK 1.5 minimum.
Hen
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> no, this is not about generics or enums or ...
>
> This time it is methods added in the classl
Done.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> The BCEL code is still under the jakarta SVN tree, which means that
>>> commit messages go to
Anyone adverse to me svn moving JCS over from Jakarta? It will mean
someone needing to update the site (which they should do while moving
that over).
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> On 22.07.11 11:33, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Anyone adverse to me svn moving JCS over from Jakarta? It will mean
>> someone needing to update the site (which they should do while moving
>> that over).
>
> I'
Noting that I've manually modified the Jakarta BCEL site to point to
this on its Maven project-info cvs-usage page.
Hen
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Done.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>>> On 22.07.11 11:33, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> Anyone adverse to me svn moving JCS o
I'm wondering what people think to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-686
I've improved the message of the thrown exception to match the
javadoc, but I'm wondering if a TTL of 2 to protect a
StackOverflowError is really necessary :) I have the urge to throw in
64, or 512, or some ran
Sigs look good.
Source unpacks happily and builds (OS X, JDK 1.6).
Release notes look good.
+1.
Hen
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/compress/tags/COMPRESS_1.2_RC1/
>
> Site:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewi
For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
following components depend on Lang:
* Chain
* Configuration
* JCS
* Proxy
and in the Sandbox:
* Flatfile
* Pipeline
Hen
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so
Mind if I upgrade JCS to Lang 3.0?
Hen
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I finished the updates to JDK 5 generics and concurrent and updated the
> maven-2 build. Still some tests fail, others should never have passed. I
> would like to ask for close review b
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> On 28.07.11 08:55, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Mind if I upgrade JCS to Lang 3.0?
>
> No problem, go ahead. Only that JCS doesn't use the new features.
Done. I also started a 2.0 side of things in the changes.xml to track
t
Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I remember I raw a thread - not sure if I did it here at commons or
> somewhere else here at apache - where specified we prefer adding
> [logging] as components dependency
Or:
"The Sisyphean task of shoving a large number of bytes up a big hill
while everyone else tries to add, remove and tweak said bytes".
= Step 1: Identify the issues.
Hopefully you are lucky and issues are accumulated in a JIRA, Bugzilla
or other issue tracker (here on JIRA as its our most comm
I definitely check it from time to time. It's very low maintenance and
many of the open items are wish-list level. I last touched it back in
April
(http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fcommons%2Fproper%2Fdbutils%2Ftrunk%2F),
and Sebb made some tweaks back in 2010.
Neither of th
gt;> Thanks!
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> Good point. I'll go ahead and update [flatfile]. IIRC the proxy 2
>>> branch already uses [lang] 3; I'll update that to use the release.
>>>
>
Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on
myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang.
JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and
Proxy need updating.
Hen
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> For the record, and so we can
Anyone against just letting users get a StackOverflowError?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-686
Hen
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I'm wondering what people think to:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-686
>
> I've im
Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> I did the proxy 2.0 branch; not sure there's a reason to worry about
> the 1.x trunk.
>
> Matt
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Note that Ch
bug and see if I can help.
>
> Thanks...
>
> Bill-
>
> On Jul 28, 2011 6:18 PM, "Henri Yandell" wrote:
>> I definitely check it from time to time. It's very low maintenance and
>> many of the open items are wish-list level. I last touched it bac
That sounds like 'yes we should do that asap' to me :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Very nearly so, yes. :)
>
> Matt
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch?
>>
>
[1]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/branches/BRANCH_2_0_EXPERIMENTAL/rgoers/
>
>
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Simone Trip
Call a single Commons vote, then point to people as either OGNL or
general Commons. That takes care of two of your votes :)
Hen
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just signed off all status items on the incubation status page
> (needs a while to sync to the la
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
> I am not really comfortable knowing that a SOE can be a "normal" code
> path. It would have to be Javadoc'd to boot.
>
> I can see catching IllegalStateException and IllegalArgumentException
> in client code, especially in a server
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Do we require license headers on test fixtures? If not, +1.
Not required.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
svn list https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases
compare_dirs.pl grab_releases.sh
sign_and_hash.shverify_archive_equivalence.sh
gpg-sign-allmultisign.shsymlinks.sh
ve
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hi Hen,
>>
>> I am not really comfortable knowing that a SOE can be a "normal" code
>> path. It would have to be Javadoc'd to boot.
>>
I'd like to release 3.0.1 of Lang. It would contain the following 11 fixes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+LANG+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.0.1%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cann
Here's a generated site:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0.1-SNAPSHOT-site/
Review the additions in the clirr report. Note the checkstyle and
findbugs reports have items that need cleanup prior to release.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org?
>
> I've been discussing the permissions issue for the old groupIds on Nexus
> with the Infra team (i.e components using the old gro
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/2/11 5:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
>>> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org?
&
rs and I'll be looking to push both to 3.0.2.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Here's a generated site:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0.1-SNAPSHOT-site/
>
> Review the additions in the clirr report. Note the checkstyle an
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/07/2011 22:01, Henri Yandell a écrit :
>>
>> Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)
>
> Yeah let's use java.util.logging instead :)
Primarily that I don't get the feeling we have
To quote the Infra team; ENOCARE :)
Now, if you're going to deploy the Maven generated website
automatically, I may care.
Hen
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> We can hold a vote. I would be persuaded to vote no if someone could point to
> an ASF or incubator policy that sa
I think we should move the current trunk off and call it generics-RnD.
Then we should copy 3.2 over to trunk (or maybe 3.3, I seem to recall
that prior to merging the generics in we had a 3.3 ready for release).
We then release 3.3.
Then we start 3.4. We genericize some tiny part of it in a bina
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>> I prefer Apache driven projects when possible. If LOG4J2 takes off,
>> feature requests would be implemented quicker, I hope.
>
> I like Log4J just fine thank you very much :)
>
> I'm lo
think it serves users better, many of whom
> have migrated to Google Guava.
>
> 1) New bug fix only release, JDK 1.4 compatible
> 2) New release with some generics, backwards compatible
> 3) Re-evaluate whether an incompatible release makes sense
>
> Stephen
>
>
> On 5 A
It's August, which must mean it's time for 3.0.1 :)
RC1 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0.1-RC1/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_1_RC1/
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0.1-RC1/mav
ns-lang3-3.0.1-src.zip is for 3.0, not 3.0.1 :(
>
> Is there a way to get rid of the FindBugs bug report with a code
> comment? It's a bummer that FB can't dive in the code and see what
> Validate does.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Jörg Schaibl
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> It's August, which must mean it's time for 3.0.1 :)
>>
>> RC1 is available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0.1-RC1/
>&
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> I think we should move the current trunk off and call it generics-RnD.
>>
>> Then we should copy 3.2 over to trunk (or maybe 3.3, I seem to recall
>> that pr
logging and see what requests and responses are going
> over the wire. Yes, I could fire up Wireshark and get the same info, but
> turning on logging is so much easier... I only wish they had this for the
> HttpCore stuff.
>
> Why do you suggest no logging for libraries?
>
> B
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2011, at 16:27, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 8/5/11 12:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> HttpComponents would be SFL4j in my structure. They definitely need
>>> debugging.
>>>
>>> Lan
Noting that because this is being worked on by Jörg and Matt (and it
seems close to resolution), I'll hold off on tagging an RC2.
Hen
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>> Hi Hen,
>>
>> Hen
Second try for 3.0.1 :)
Three changes - fixed version for the archive files, proper fix to
LANG-727 and missing javadoc implemented.
RC2 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0.1-RC2/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_1_RC2/
at
> least have another name, and the OSGi attributes are probably incorrect,
> too. But I checked that this was also the case for Lang 3.0, so this is
> probably not blocking.
>
> So in total I am +1 for the release.
> Oliver
>
> Am 06.08.2011 21:16, schrieb Henri Yand
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 August 2011 22:59, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Oliver Heger
>> wrote:
>>> Maven build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. I also tested the
>>> ant build successfu
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Karlsen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> org.apache.commons.lang.math.RandomUtils does not exist in lang3 and I could
> not find anything in the migration guide.
> Are there any alternatives in lang3?
Nope - it was removed as not having enough value.
Which part were you usi
Absolutely :)
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1.
>
> Nits are OK by me.
>
> We have 3.0.2 around the corner anyway, right :)
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Second try for 3.0.1 :)
>>
>>
Btw (aimed to Greg and anyone else) - never feel that the committers
would be best to put it together. I've gotten Open Source projects out
the door without being a committer simply by listing the things I/they
thought they should work on on a wiki. It's a bit more of a pain
without access to defin
e pull in 1000 directions, as
> opposed to 10 people pulling in 6 directions. ;-)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Btw (aimed to Greg and anyone else) - never feel that the committers
>> would be best to put it together. I've
Thanks all for voting. 5 +1s, including my implicit +1.
I'll get to work on pushing the releases out.
Hen
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Second try for 3.0.1 :)
>
> Three changes - fixed version for the archive files, proper fix to
> LANG-727 an
Noting that the distribution and maven bundle have been uploaded and
are now awaiting sync. I'll give that a day and then deploy the site
tomorrow night.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Thanks all for voting. 5 +1s, including my implicit +1.
>
> I
ns.
2) Updating from 3.0 to 3.0.1.
The latter would have avoided the 3.0.1-RC1 issue that Gary found.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Noting that the distribution and maven bundle have been uploaded and
> are now awaiting sync. I'll give that a day and then
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> * On the ASF model
>
> In a nutshell, while the ASF is a great organization in many ways, it
> is not a meritocracy mainly because merit is not measured at all and
> at the project level no responsiblity is accrued on merit beyond
> committersh
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Commons
Lang 3.0.1.
As the version suggests, this is a drop-in replacement for 3.0. A list
of the 9 changes and 6 bug fixes in this release are found in the
release notes:
https://commons.apache.org/lang/changes-report.html#a3.0.1
F
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 8:02 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
>
> Thank you for posting this summary of the Apache way. Yes, it is damn
> hard to track contributions, especially if one wishes to do it
> accurately and fairly. Howeve
Modify manually to fix :)
I don't think we'll need to make a new one, that shows 2.6->3.0 and
after that will be generated.
Hen
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> The 2.0 to 3.0 Clirr report here:
>
> https://commons.apache.org/lang/lang2-lang3-clirr-report.html
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:33 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 19:38, Matthew Pocock wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As those of you who've been following the CODEC-125 ticket will know, with
>> Greg's help I've got a port of the beider morse phonetic
>> matching (bmpm) algorithm in as a string encoder. A
+1.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> +1 for both sub-votes.
>
> Matt
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>> BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta.
>>
>> It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP.
>>
>> IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF.
+1 (Commons PMC).
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> OGNL [1] has checked off all status items in the incubator.
>
> Most of the OGNL developers are already commons developers and the
> risk of failure is pretty small, even without having made a release.
> As the Common
Thanks. It was an unused import, so I've removed it. It also showed
up in javadoc and I've fixed that too.
Hen
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:00 AM, sebb wrote:
> QueryRunnerTest imports java.util.concurrent.RunnableFuture which
> requires Java 1.6
>
> ---
Thanks :)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:09 AM, sebb wrote:
> Removed the definition as I see you are now aiming for 1.5 again.
>
>
> On 19 August 2011 15:52, sebb wrote:
>> Failure was due to requiring Java 1.6; the Commons Continnum default is 1.5.
>>
>> I've added a local build definition for DbUt
I'll try to dig deeper, but don't wait on me.
On the website:
This is a bad page. A user clicks 'examples' and gets a blank page
(pretty much):
http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/site/commons-vfs2-examples/index.html
Clirr reports would be nice to show the API change. You'll have t
see it. Eyes weren't working. :)
Hen
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Notes below.
> On Aug 20, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> I'll try to dig deeper, but don't wait on me.
>>
>> On the website:
>>
>>
Switching over to the dev list.
Anyone available to work with Barrie on this?
Thanks,
Hen
-- Forwarded message --
From: Barrie Treloar
Date: Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:39 PM
Subject: [lang] Dev support for LANG-378 new ToStyle to support
MultiLine with Indent
To: u...@commons.apac
Rolled back. Sorry for the screwup.
Hen
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Description Resource Path Location Type
> ComparatorUtils cannot be resolved to a variable NullComparator.java
> /commons-lang/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/compare
Agreed :) Nice catch.
I'll also deprecate the chomp(String,String) version for removal in 4.0.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Verneri Åberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just browsing through StringUtils Api (versions 2.5, 2.6 and
> 3.0.1) and found two very similar looking methods
>
> chom
201 - 300 of 1072 matches
Mail list logo
