On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >> I prefer Apache driven projects when possible. If LOG4J2 takes off, >> feature requests would be implemented quicker, I hope. > > I like Log4J just fine thank you very much :) > > I'm looking forward to 2.0.
That's generally where I am thought-wise. A) If you're a generic reusble library; don't do logging if you can help it. B) If you are an app, use log4j. C) If you truly need a bridge, use SLF4j. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
