Anyone against just letting users get a StackOverflowError? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-686
Hen On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm wondering what people think to: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-686 > > I've improved the message of the thrown exception to match the > javadoc, but I'm wondering if a TTL of 2 to protect a > StackOverflowError is really necessary :) I have the urge to throw in > 64, or 512, or some random number as a minimum value, but unsure. > > Alternatively, we could just let the StackOverflowError happen and > remove the TTL code. > > Thoughts? > > Hen > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
