I'm assuming this is Commons Math. I've added a [math] so it catches the interest of those involved.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Greg Sterijevski <gsterijev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Additionally, I pass all of the Wampler beta estimates. > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Greg Sterijevski > <gsterijev...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I am testing the first 'updating' ols regression algorithm. I ran it >> through the Wampler1 data. It gets 1.0s for all of the beta estimates. I >> next ran the Longley dataset. I match, but with a tolerance of 1.0e-6. This >> is a bit less than two orders of magnitude worse than the current incore >> estimator( 2.0e-8). My question to the list, is how important is this diff? >> Is it worth tearing things apart to figure out where the error is >> accumulating? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Greg >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
