On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne >> <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: >>> On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote: >>>> 1/ FastDateFormat >>>> The date format "yyyy yyy yy y" is formatted with JDK 7 as "2003 2003 03 >>>> 2003" instead of "2003 03 03 03". So, should FastDateFormat follow the >>>> JDK in any case and adjust its result according the runtime? >>>> Interestingly Javadoc states already for Java 6: "For formatting, if the >>>> number of pattern letters is 2, the year is truncated to 2 digits; >>>> otherwise it is interpreted as a number." >>> >>> I think that since this release is not compatible with previous >>> releases, then [lang] should follow JDK 7 conventions only, with good >>> javadoc about what it does. >> >> +1. > > Done. Please review Javadocs ;-) >
Looks good :) Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
