On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Hen, > > Henri Yandell wrote: > >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. >> >> RC4 is available here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/ >> >> SVN: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/ >> >> Maven artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/ >> >> Website: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/ >> >> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove >> useful: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3- > clirr--report.html >> >> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July >> 2011. >> >> ================ >> [ ] +1 >> [ ] -1, with reason >> ================ >> >> Hen >> >> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 >> effort* > > As usual I build from the source tarball with my compiler zoo. > > A test fails with IBM JDK 6, because the test makes wrong assumptions about > the implementation details of ArrayList delivered by the runtime: > ============ %< =========== > Failed tests: > testReflectionHierarchyArrayList(org.apache.commons.lang3.builder.ToStringBuilderTest): > null > expected:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[elementData={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>},size=0],modCount=0]> > but > was:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[firstIndex=0,lastIndex=0,array={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>}],modCount=0]> > ============ %< ===========
Can you open up a JIRA Item for this one? I don't think it's a release blocker, but we should fix it in 3.0.1. > You're already fixed the issues of the checkstyle report in trunk. > > > Site problems: > ============== > > 1/ Users Guide, 1: The description misses the fact that Lang3 can be used > side-by-side with a previous version Very good point. > 2/ Users Guide, 2: Head of page contains a link for "lang3.exception.*", but > no section exists. Good catch. > 3/ Release History/release notes for 3.0: The "coloring" fails in the bottom > of the page due to single quotes in the text Ditto :) > 4/ Building: Misses the link for the upgrade notes to 3.0 in the list Good catch - forgot this page existed :) > 5/ Distribution Management: Report should be disabled, links are not valid > for users Any idea how? > 6/ Changes Report: Claims 3.0 to be unreleased Yeah, need to put whatever date the release is when pushing the final site up. > None of this is a blocker though, therefore +1 *cheer* :) I'll aim to hit all before release (bar distribution management); but anyone else should feel free to tweak the site. Whenever we successfully release I'll deploy a site from trunk instead of the RC'd version. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
