On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Gary Lucas wrote:
> I see there's some discussion about the next release of Sanselan between
> Damjan Jovanovic, Gary Gregory (I'm the other Gary) and some of the Apache
> community leaders. My name was even mentioned... so I thought I'd chime in.
>
> First off,
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 20 December 2011 00:05, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/20 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 23:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
2011/12/20 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 23:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
On 19 December 2011 23:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> You
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
>
> 1.7 WC is different, an
On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
>>>
>>> 1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by SVNkit.
>> I know but the mail subject says " buildNumbe
On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
>>
>> 1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by SVNkit.
> I know but the mail subject says " buildNumber plugin - svnjava does
> n
Sorry, finally caught up on the attic discussion thread...
We Commoners could try to find a way to at least let users see some metric
on the stability/maturity/activity on projects so they can evaluate the risk
they are taking using it.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.6
Le 19/12/2011 20:33, Gary Lucas a écrit :
Finally, I wanted to ask if there would be any problems in changing the
compiler targets in the pom.xml to 1.5 for release 1.0. The current compiler
targets are set up to compile with Java 1.4 features, but I just switched them
to 1.5 and everythin
On Dec 19, 2011, at 14:34, Gary Lucas wrote:
> I see there's some discussion about the next release of Sanselan between
> Damjan Jovanovic, Gary Gregory (I'm the other Gary) and some of the Apache
> community leaders. My name was even mentioned... so I thought I'd chime in.
>
> First off, Damj
No it wouldn't.
To me what I'm looking for is not conceptually different from the request
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-34
What I'm discovering is the lack of extensibility of the BasicQueryRunner
class. The only way to return another type of Map is to override the toMap
method (re
+1
(Thanks again Sebb)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-JEXL-2-1-1-based-on-RC1-tp4215081p4215744.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
+1 for graduating graph, go Simo, go!
Phil Steitz wrote
>
> We have too many "one man shows" and walking dead in Commons proper now to
> make more.
>
Can't you propose a clear list of what you believe should go to the attic
and/or votes?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commo
Sorry Sebb, busier w.e. than expected.
Thanks for pushing the release.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1215050-in-commons-proper-jexl-tags-COMMONS-JEXL-2-1-RC3-src-main-java-org-apache-coma-tp4204034p4215680.html
Sent from the Commons - D
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
>
> 1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by SVNkit.
I know but the mail subject says " buildNumber plugin - svnjava does
not work with SVN 1.6 WC format currently".
So that was my q
+1
Found no problems with the build, the site, and the artifacts.
Oliver
Am 19.12.2011 19:13, schrieb sebb:
This is a minor release to fix a regression in 2.1
What's new in 2.1.1
===
Version 2.1.1 is a bugfix release to address a regression in 2.1:
* JEXL-124: Array paramete
On 19 December 2011 19:10, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/19/11 12:02 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 19 December 2011 18:24, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/19/11 11:13 AM, sebb wrote:
This is a minor release to fix a regression in 2.1
What's new in 2.1.1
===
Version 2.1.
I see there's some discussion about the next release of Sanselan between Damjan
Jovanovic, Gary Gregory (I'm the other Gary) and some of the Apache community
leaders. My name was even mentioned... so I thought I'd chime in.
First off, Damjan posted a note to the issue tracker that my submitted
On 12/19/11 7:48 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/18/11 1:12 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> [ ] +1 Accept [graph] as a proper component
>>> [ ] +/- 0 uhm...
>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept it - and please explain why
>>>
>>> Open will stay open f
On 12/19/11 10:47 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
>> but this procedural VOTE is not subject to veto, so I will shut up now.
> I'm really sorry but I'm worried you got me wrong - that was not my intention.
No, I am sorry the wording above is misleading. I meant "promote"
as in s/sandbox/pr
On 12/19/11 12:02 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 December 2011 18:24, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/19/11 11:13 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> This is a minor release to fix a regression in 2.1
>>>
>>> What's new in 2.1.1
>>> ===
>>> Version 2.1.1 is a bugfix release to address a regression in 2.1:
>>
On 19 December 2011 18:24, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/19/11 11:13 AM, sebb wrote:
>> This is a minor release to fix a regression in 2.1
>>
>> What's new in 2.1.1
>> ===
>> Version 2.1.1 is a bugfix release to address a regression in 2.1:
>>
>> * JEXL-124: Array parameters to metho
Matt Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Emmanuel Bourg
> wrote:
>> +1 for renaming
>>
>> What's the best choice, Commons Images or Commons Image ? I tend to
>> prefer the plural form.
>
> Having introduce alternatives, [imaging] strikes me as even more
> appropriate.
+1
- Jörg
On 12/19/11 11:13 AM, sebb wrote:
> This is a minor release to fix a regression in 2.1
>
> What's new in 2.1.1
> ===
> Version 2.1.1 is a bugfix release to address a regression in 2.1:
>
> * JEXL-124: Array parameters to methods don't work anymore
>
> There are no other changes
>
>
This is a minor release to fix a regression in 2.1
What's new in 2.1.1
===
Version 2.1.1 is a bugfix release to address a regression in 2.1:
* JEXL-124: Array parameters to methods don't work anymore
There are no other changes
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/prop
Hi Phil,
> but this procedural VOTE is not subject to veto, so I will shut up now.
I'm really sorry but I'm worried you got me wrong - that was not my intention.
sincerely,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http:
On 19 December 2011 17:16, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/19/11 7:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
>>
>> The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net],
>> and so on.
>>
>> This VOTE is open until December 22, 1
Le 19/12/2011 18:25, Matt Benson a écrit :
Having introduce alternatives, [imaging] strikes me as even more appropriate.
You are right, and that's in line with the well known Java Advanced
Imaging API.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> +1 for renaming
>
> What's the best choice, Commons Images or Commons Image ? I tend to prefer
> the plural form.
Having introduce alternatives, [imaging] strikes me as even more appropriate.
Matt
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
>
> Le 19/12/2011
+1 for renaming
What's the best choice, Commons Images or Commons Image ? I tend to
prefer the plural form.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 19/12/2011 15:54, Gary Gregory a écrit :
This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [
On 12/19/11 7:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
>
> The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net],
> and so on.
>
> This VOTE is open until December 22, 10AM EST.
>
> Gary
>
Why are we voting on this? This ki
On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by SVNkit.
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> When I added the buildNumber plugin to CP22, it seemed that it would
>> be best to use the "svnjava" provider, as that works even
On 12/19/11 2:00 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil, sorry but I think I lost you.
>
> Maybe actual Commons committers are interested on see [graph] released
> but don't have spare time to commit on it - OTOH, there are non ASF
> committers (researchers that work on the graph field) interested on
On 19 December 2011 01:03, aris2world wrote:
> I don't have a generic order for keys, my order is the same of the fields
> in select list:
> select , , ..., from ...
> when the resultset of this query is mapped, values in the map are inserted
> in this order , , ..., .
> I'd like that map.keySet(
I thought you would suggest renaming the component to something more
descriptive like commons-images ;) For the reminder "sans élan" in
french means "Without Momentum", that sounds really weird to us cheese
lovers.
+1 for consistent class names
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 18/12/2011 22:18, Gary Grego
Hello,
You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
2011/12/19 sebb :
> When I added the buildNumber plugin to CP22, it seemed that it would
> be best to use the "svnjava" provider, as that works even if the user
> does not have a command-line svn client installed.
>
> However, since then, the SVN working copy format
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> I have the feel to express my +1 vote but have Christian's similar
> worries - not sure, but maybe once [vote] successes, there should be a
> resolution... anyway I'm not expert on that field, I just voted
> following my sentim
Hi Gary,
I have the feel to express my +1 vote but have Christian's similar
worries - not sure, but maybe once [vote] successes, there should be a
resolution... anyway I'm not expert on that field, I just voted
following my sentiments.
PS I thought the name comes from joining 2 French words "sans
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> +1 for Image. Like it very much and fits better
>
> But I want to emphasize that I would like to respect the wish of the
> original developer in this case. Probably he has some emotions around
> this and I don't want to force a name cha
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/18/11 1:12 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> [ ] +1 Accept [graph] as a proper component
>> [ ] +/- 0 uhm...
>> [ ] -1 Don't accept it - and please explain why
>>
>> Open will stay open for 72h and closes on Wed 21th, 8:15 PM CET.
>
> -1 unles
When I added the buildNumber plugin to CP22, it seemed that it would
be best to use the "svnjava" provider, as that works even if the user
does not have a command-line svn client installed.
However, since then, the SVN working copy format has changed, and the
svnjava provider relies on SVNkit whic
On 16 December 2011 22:59, sebb wrote:
> On 16 December 2011 13:33, sebb wrote:
>> On 16 December 2011 12:19, henrib wrote:
>>> I probably used manual editing, otherwise it would be properly reverted...
>>> If you have the svn command on top of your head to revert to the initial RC3
>>> version,
On 19 December 2011 08:53, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 12/17/11 7:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Another slightly odd looking thing is to have
>>> org.apache.commons.sanselan.common as a package. There is also a util
>>> packages. I wonder I this stuff can be mov
Hi Hasan,
I don't have a generic order for keys, my order is the same of the fields
in select list:
select , , ..., from ...
when the resultset of this query is mapped, values in the map are inserted
in this order , , ..., .
I'd like that map.keySet().iterator() let me iterate over values in that
Hi Phil, sorry but I think I lost you.
Maybe actual Commons committers are interested on see [graph] released
but don't have spare time to commit on it - OTOH, there are non ASF
committers (researchers that work on the graph field) interested on
contributing, so we could build the component micro-
Hi Phil,
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/17/11 7:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Another slightly odd looking thing is to have
>> org.apache.commons.sanselan.common as a package. There is also a util
>> packages. I wonder I this stuff can be moved around in some way that
>> looks and feels less scattere
On 12/18/11 1:12 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
> Since I proposed[1] to resurrect commons-graph from dormant to
> sandbox, there's been not only my personal activity, but we have
> recorded a good number of discussions on the ML and received
> contributions on JIRA[2], involving not only PMC
50 matches
Mail list logo
