Hello, You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ? 2011/12/19 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > When I added the buildNumber plugin to CP22, it seemed that it would > be best to use the "svnjava" provider, as that works even if the user > does not have a command-line svn client installed. > > However, since then, the SVN working copy format has changed, and the > svnjava provider relies on SVNkit which does not yet support the new > WC format. > > Unfortunately, the buildnumber plugin does not support overriding the > provider via a property
you can probably use a profile for that. >, only via POM configuration. I've updated CP > in SVN to allow the provider to be overridden on the command-line. > > The question is: what should the default setting be? > > Is it safe to assume that most Commons Developers (particularly RMs) > have an SVN command-line client installed? > > If so, then perhaps a better default would be to use that, but still > allow override via a property. > > Or maybe a Maven guru can describe how to detect if the svn > command-line client is present (this must be reliable, and work across > all OSes). > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
