Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] CCC13 Hackfest: Storage Architecture Summary

Thanks John, I am still studying on it but most is adequately describing our session. On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:47 PM, John Burwell wrote: > 5. Backup/Storage Snapshots: Support transfer of storage snapshots from > device to device (e.g. from a SAN to an object store). Dependent on the > flexi

Re: Review Request 12327: dnsmasq propagation to vpc routervm

Prasanna, Can you direct this one to some one with an insight into this part of the system? thanks, Daan On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:37 PM, daan Hoogland wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/ > Review request for cloudstack

Re: Review Request 12327: dnsmasq propagation to vpc routervm

All, I want to backport this to 4.1.x and 4.2 as I consider it a bug. On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Prasanna, Can you direct this one to some one with an insight into this > part of the system? > > thanks, > Daan > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:37 PM, daan Hoogland wrote

Re: Review Request 12327: dnsmasq propagation to vpc routervm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/ --- (Updated July 9, 2013, 9:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy,

Re: Review Request 12323: Cloudstack-3241 Adding ip range fails if there are two IP ranges existing in two different CIDRs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12323/#review22893 --- server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java

Re: Review Request 12109: HAProxy maxconn is not configurable

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12109/#review22894 --- plugins/network-elements/internal-loadbalancer/src/org/apache/cloud

Re: Review Request 12109: HAProxy maxconn is not configurable

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12109/#review22895 --- core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/routing/LoadBalancerConfigCommand.java

Re: Review Request 12109: HAProxy maxconn is not configurable

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12109/#review22896 --- core/src/com/cloud/network/HAProxyConfigurator.java

Re: Review Request 12273: Cloudstack-2150 DB table entries of phisical network is not proper.Shows Duplicate entries Cloudstack-2980 Adding a VLAN range that overlaps with two existing ranges results

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/#review22897 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java

Re: Review Request 12273: Cloudstack-2150 DB table entries of phisical network is not proper.Shows Duplicate entries Cloudstack-2980 Adding a VLAN range that overlaps with two existing ranges results

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/#review22898 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java

Re: Review Request 12273: Cloudstack-2150 DB table entries of phisical network is not proper.Shows Duplicate entries Cloudstack-2980 Adding a VLAN range that overlaps with two existing ranges results

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/#review22899 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java

Re: Review Request 12251: Incorporating the review comments given by Alena and Sheng

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12251/#review22900 --- server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java

Review Request 12358: CLOUDSTACK-3228: system vms are not comming up in zone with two cluster xen and kvm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3228 Repository: cloudstack-g

Re: Review Request 12358: CLOUDSTACK-3228: system vms are not comming up in zone with two cluster xen and kvm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/ --- (Updated July 9, 2013, 10:34 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: Review Request 12251: Incorporating the review comments given by Alena and Sheng

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12251/#review22901 --- Can you create a new patch that consolidates all these changes and r

Re: Review Request 12358: CLOUDSTACK-3228: system vms are not comming up in zone with two cluster xen and kvm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/#review22902 --- server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java

Re: cloudstack 4.1 QinQ vlan behaviour

So, nobody uses q in q and cloudstack 4.1 ? On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Valery Ciareszka wrote: > Hi all, > > I use the following environment: CS 4.1, KVM, Centos 6.4 > (management+node1+node2), OpenIndiana NFS server as primary and secondary > storage > I have advanced networking in zone. I

Re: Review Request 11906: CLOUDSTACK-1047: tracking in logs using job id

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/#review22903 --- Patch doesn't apply cleanly on master. Can you verify and share an u

How to evaluate performance of a resource allocation policy?

Hello All, As you know, evaluating performance of a resource allocation policy for a cloud environment is very important, also it is critical to be able to compare different policies' performance with each other. So, I am interested to know that do developers of CloudStack use any specific too

cloudstack-installation

I am trying to install cloudstack following the steps given in the INSTALL.md file which is there with the cloudstack release. However I have been unsuccessful. I am trying to download maven, but all the mirrors say "Page Not Found". Then I am trying to get the KEYS File, but it opens up in a n

RE: Unable to start secondary storage in DevCloud

Hi Syed, You could try increasing the overprovisiong factor for storage (storage.overprovisioning.factor). You'll find it under Global Settings -> search for 'factor' storage.overprovisioning.factor There is also the CPU and Memory over provisioning factors there as well. Once you change any

Re: Unable to start secondary storage in DevCloud

Thanks for your reply Tariq. I fiddled around with the settings a bit but the problem still persisted. I then saw that the primary storage was scoped for the HOST instead of CLUSTER or ZONE. I added one more primary storage and then restarted management server and the secondary storage came up.

question about migrate VMs from xenserver 6.1 to cloudstack 3.0.2/4.1

Hi, We have a xenserver 6.1 pool with 6 hosts, there are total about 90 VMs. Some with one disk and others with 2 disk on NFS shared storage. In the meanwhile, we have a cloudstack 3.0.2 with xenserver 6.0.2 hosts.(we had plan of upgrading to cloudstack 4.1&xenserver 6.1 soon) The storage is on i

Re: How to evaluate performance of a resource allocation policy?

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 04:40:37AM -0700, Linux TUX wrote: > Hello All, > > > As you know, evaluating performance of a resource allocation policy for a > cloud environment is very important, also it is critical to be able to > compare different policies' performance with each other. So, I am in

Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:44:26AM +, Edison Su wrote: > The simulator issue should be fixed on 4.2 branch. Do you mind pulling those changes into master?

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Edison, As I read through this thread, we seem to be conflating the following topics: 1. Feature regression testing per release cycle 2. Identifying and back porting defect fixes to previous releases 3. Feature removal process To my mind, these topics are completely unrel

Re: cloudstack-installation

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:09:06AM -0700, gaurav jain wrote: > I am trying to install cloudstack following the steps given in the INSTALL.md > file which is there with the cloudstack release. > > However I have been unsuccessful. I am trying to download maven, but all the > mirrors say "Page Not

Re: Review Request 12184: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-2927

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12184/#review22907 --- Commit 48d2525f477bf2f2b22b9baabc44c93a10f6d725 in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 12358: CLOUDSTACK-3228: system vms are not comming up in zone with two cluster xen and kvm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/ --- (Updated July 9, 2013, 3:02 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Review Request 12364: Follow up fix for CLOUDSTACK-2777

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Likitha Shetty and Prachi Damle. Repository: clo

Regions in 4.1

Did the regions model get fully implemented in 4.1? Is it usable and functional? Has anyone actually deployed it yet with the 4.1 release? Thanks, Matt

Re: Review Request 12364: Follow up fix for CLOUDSTACK-2777

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review22908 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Likitha Shetty On July 9, 2013, 3:20 p.m., R

Re: Review Request 12364: Follow up fix for CLOUDSTACK-2777

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review22909 --- Commit 3e7cebee2967e3523cb679ef30fcb19f7949c2dc in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12364: Follow up fix for CLOUDSTACK-2777

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review22910 --- Commit 2005aae7ac0a8a10ab4fc64803354ca4051a6d29 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12364: Follow up fix for CLOUDSTACK-2777

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review22911 --- Commit e1736bcca50f1c74b1c71dce72e27ef7f62bab30 in branch refs/head

Re: cloudstack-installation

If you're working with 4.1, the current documentation contains several path or URL errors that are not updated with CloudStack refactor. It's better to refer to the daily build for the unreleased 4.1.1 at jenkins: http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-installguide/lastSuccessfulBuild

RE: Unable to start secondary storage in DevCloud

Syed, The Console Proxy VM is also a system VM and presents a console view for a VM instance via the web UI. With it being a DevCloud, if you don't need to use the console proxy then you can set the maximum number of console proxy vms to 0 under Global Settings. Btw have you followed step 8 to

Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

During the setup process, I now get some NumberFormatExceptions. I call: mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin.setup -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl :cloud-marvin integration-test I see in the console: ERROR [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (Simulator-Agent-Mgr-1:) Monitor DownloadListener says the

Re: cloudstack-installation

Ryan, I am new to cloudstack, on the basis of some resources suggested to me I was starting to set up an environment on my machine. My main goal is to understand the principle and theory behind cloudstack and start contributing to the community. So guide me If I am wrong somewhere Regards Gaura

Re: cloudstack-installation

Chip I was going through and following the steps given on the link suggested by you. However I was unsuccessful. http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/sect-source-verify.html The KEYS link opens up a html page. I tried copying the data

Re: cloudstack-installation

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:55:36AM -0700, gaurav jain wrote: > Chip > I was going through and following the steps given on the link suggested by > you. > However I was unsuccessful. > > http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/sect-source-

RE: Regions in 4.1

There is no UI support for regions in 4.1. All API calls relating to regions feature is implemented. Note that cloudstack does not do data sync between regions. There are few open issues relating to Regions and Event notifications: CLOUDSTACK-1673 - AWS Regions - Events - User disable / Domain D

RE: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

I think it's the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3139, that your mgt server can't access the url of template. > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 9:41 AM > To: > Subject: Re: Using the ACS sim

Re: cloudstack-installation

Chip It is a HTML link. What should I do. Copy the text in a text file? what extension should it have? Is there any particular directory I should save it to? From: Chip Childers To: gaurav jain Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Re: Review Request 12245: CLOUDSTACK-1960: Fix for UK Keyboard Bar symbol.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12245/#review22921 --- Ship it! looks good, ship it. - Fang Wang On July 3, 2013, 11:4

Re: cloudstack-installation

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:36:24AM -0700, gaurav jain wrote: > Chip > It is a HTML link. > What should I do. Copy the text in a text file? what extension should it > have? Is there any particular directory I should save it to? It's a text file. Just save it to whatever location or file you want,

RE: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:52 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some > questions. > =) > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:44:26AM +, Edi

Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +, Edison Su wrote: > I think it's the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3139, > that your mgt server can't access the url of template. Yeah, it appears so. Thanks for searching for me. Apparently I was too lazy to actually check mysel

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:53 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: 'Chip Childers' > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > Edison, > > As I read through this threa

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:56:24PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:53 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: 'Chip Childers' > > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody want

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:00 AM > To: Edison Su > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:56:24PM +00

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:56:24PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:53 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: 'Chip Childers' > > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody want

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:01:08PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:00 AM > > To: Edison Su > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody w

Re: Review Request 12245: CLOUDSTACK-1960: Fix for UK Keyboard Bar symbol.

> On July 9, 2013, 5:37 p.m., Fang Wang wrote: > > looks good, ship it. Did you commit this Fang? - Chip --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12245/#review22921 ---

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 1:26 PM > To: Edison Su > Cc: > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:15:19PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > >

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:12:22PM +, Edison Su wrote: > If it's ok to use S3 api talking to swift, then there is zero effort to > support Swift. > But who will make the decision? We, as a community. It's *always* that answer. If you are proposing this as the corrective path, then ok... le

Re: Review Request 12327: dnsmasq propagation to vpc routervm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/ --- (Updated July 9, 2013, 6:38 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy,

Re: Review Request 12327: dnsmasq propagation to vpc routervm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/#review22926 --- Getting this error after applying to master: Tests in error: te

Re: Review Request 12327: dnsmasq propagation to vpc routervm

> On July 9, 2013, 6:41 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > Getting this error after applying to master: > > > > Tests in error: > > > > testConfigDnsMasq(com.cloud.network.router.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImplTest): > > Failed to load ApplicationContext FWIW, outside of the test failure

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:22 AM > To: Edison Su > Cc: > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:12:22PM +, Edison Su wrote: > >

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:22 AM > > To: Edison Su > > Cc: > > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported i

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3417) [Upgrade to 4.2.0] Upgrade to 4.2.0 fails with om.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Table 'cloud.baremetal_dhcp_devices' doesn't exist

Was this fixed in the 4.1 branch as well? On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 07:09:52PM +, Alena Prokharchyk (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13703664#comment-13703664 >

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Edison, Swift does not support S3 multi-part uploads [1] which CloudStack must use in order to store files larger than 5 GB. Therefore, using the Swift's S3 compatibility layer is not a viable workaround. Thanks, -John [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison On Jul 9

Review Request 12369: Ignore network interfaces without uuids when passing extra config to ESX for nvp

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12369/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang, Sateesh Chodapuneedi,

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

if swift does not work anymore in 4.0 or 4.1 maybe be should inform swiftstack: http://swiftstack.com/cloudstack/ On Jul 9, 2013, at 3:57 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Edison, > > Swift does not support S3 multi-part uploads [1] which CloudStack must use in > order to store files larger than 5 GB

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > if swift does not work anymore in 4.0 or 4.1 maybe be should inform > swiftstack: > http://swiftstack.com/cloudstack/ Just to be clear, we're not sure about 4.0 or 4.1 at all. All that has been said is that it wasn't in the test plan f

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

It sounds like there are a lot of work to do, to support multi-part upload: http://www.mirantis.com/blog/large-objects-in-cloud-storages/ " As you can see, Amazon S3 API is more high-level while Swift API for large objects is pretty raw. Swift doesn't make a distinction between objects and objec

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Could they(swiftstack) help us, or guide us on how to implement multi-part upload? > -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: 'Chip Childers' > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken,

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013, at 03:15 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Could they(swiftstack) help us, or guide us on how to implement > multi-part upload? I've sent an email to John at SwiftStack to see if they might be able to jump into the conversation. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @j

Re: Review Request 11479: SolidFire storage plug-in and enhancements to the storage framework and GUI

> On June 28, 2013, 3:42 p.m., John Burwell wrote: > > core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/AttachVolumeCommand.java, line 61 > > > > > > Fix formatting/continuation from the previous line I think I fixed all formatting issues

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Edison, TL;DR The shorter path is to re-implement/fix the Swift driver. Multipart upload would need to implemented in Swift, not in CloudStack. Therefore, such a change would need to be accepted and released by the OpenStack project before the 4.2.0 release. We would also be stranding any of

Re: Review Request 12364: Follow up fix for CLOUDSTACK-2777

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review22933 --- Commit 3e7cebee2967e3523cb679ef30fcb19f7949c2dc in branch refs/heads

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:31 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: 'Chip Childers' > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > Edison, > > TL;DR The shorter path is to

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Edison, I did not say that Swift can't handle files greater than 5 GB. With S3, you must use multi-part uploads in order to upload a file greater than 5GB. Therefore, Swift's S3 compatibility layer must be compatible with the S3 multipart upload API in order to work with CloudStack. Please s

SimulatorSecondaryDiscoverer bean

Hi Edison, It looks like this bean is missing from the applicationContext.xml file with commit# 5e13327339305cd81993952abbd8c19409a48537, causing the mgmt. server to fail to startup with this error : INFO [hypervisor.vmware.VmwareServerDiscoverer] (main:) VmwareServerDiscoverer is constructed

RE: SimulatorSecondaryDiscoverer bean

We should move all the simulator related classes into client/tomcatconf/simulatorComponentContext.xml.in Let me fix it, thanks for your report. > -Original Message- > From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:02 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Edison Su > Subj

RE: SimulatorSecondaryDiscoverer bean

Ah ok, thanks Edison! Cheers! Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Edison Su Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:10 PM To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: SimulatorSecondaryDiscoverer bean We should move all the simulator related classes into client/tomcatc

Expanding a volume on a SAN

Hi everyone, I had a question posed to me today regarding how CloudStack and the underlying hypervisor deal with an iSCSI volume that is expanded. For example, let's say I'm using XenServer or ESX and I create a storage repository or datastore, respectively, for each hypervisor based on an iSCSI

RE: Expanding a volume on a SAN

http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX120865 for XenServer, VMs need to be shut down or migrated away before expanding a volume. Anthony -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:25 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc:

Re: Review Request 12348: Fix for NPE when listing eligible primary storage pools for volume migration across primary storages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12348/ --- (Updated July 9, 2013, 10:15 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:57 AM > To: Edison Su > Cc: > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in > 4.2? > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +, Edison Su wrote: >

RE: How to evaluate performance of a resource allocation policy?

> > Consider using the simulator plugin, which will simulate hosts. You can > follow > the testing instructions on the Marvin testing page [1], but modify your setup > to implement whatever number of hosts you want to test against. From > there, you would need to modify the allocator that's ena

Re: Expanding a volume on a SAN

Thanks! Anyone know if CloudStack will recognize the new size of a storage repository or datastore on its own? On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Anthony Xu wrote: > http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX120865 > > for XenServer, VMs need to be shut down or migrated away before expanding > a volu

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

I've also sent a request off to Mirantis to see if they could lend any expertise to the fire to help. Cheers, Matt On 7/9/13 3:19 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote: >On Tue, Jul 9, 2013, at 03:15 PM, Edison Su wrote: >> Could they(swiftstack) help us, or guide us on how to implement >> multi-part up

CloudStack Mirrors

Greetings,Is there any plan to make use of mirrors for folks downloading / updating from the repo. Or is there one in existence now?- Maurice

Re: Expanding a volume on a SAN

Hey Anthony, I assume this would be a candidate situation where you'd put the primary storage in maintenance mode and then perform the steps you referred me to? When the storage is brought out of maintenance mode, will it see the new size or is there something more that has to be done on the CS s

Re: CloudStack Mirrors

If there is a need, we (Contegix) are happy to host one. Cheers, Matthew --- Matthew E. Porter Contegix E-mail: matthew.por...@contegix.com Twitter: @meporter | http://twitter.com/meporter On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:24 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Greetings, > > Is there any plan to make use of

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

I've been watching from the outside and tracking the entire discussion, and with what has happened with the delays with 4.0 and 4.1 am worried that this could be come the next delayer to the release of 4.2. At the same time, I'm very much in agreement with David N., Chip and John B. that we can't j

System VM

Hello,I'm curious, is this the most recent up to date system VM for download for KVM?http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2

Re: CloudStack Mirrors

That would seem to make sense. Great for redundancy, and if the mirrors are on multiple continents then it should help with any bandwidth starved downloaders. On Jul 9, 2013 8:24 PM, "Maurice Lawler" wrote: > Greetings, > > Is there any plan to make use of mirrors for folks downloading / updating

Re: CloudStack Mirrors

Agreed, today alone; I am doing another fresh install for some of the RPMs it took 14 minutes. Where others took what appeared seconds. On Jul 09, 2013, at 09:32 PM, Kelly Hair wrote:That would seem to make sense. Great for redundancy, and if the mirrors are on multiple continents then it should h

Re: CloudStack News - Moving to Wednesday

Hi, all. According to the Apache infra status http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ , the ASF Blog system has been in the status of CRITICAL or WARNING for many days, and I'm still not able to browse the newsletter website. It's close to Wednesday now. Does anyone know what's going on there? --

Re: CloudStack News - Moving to Wednesday

Yes, there are some problems with roller instance (the underlying software that blogs.a.o runs). Infrastructure has been discussing the situation. There is no immediate timeline on having the issue resolved to my knowledge. --David On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Ryan Lei wrote: > Hi, all. Acco

Re: AWS SDK version for object store

I'm +1 also to taking the latest stable release. Tom. On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 13:28 -0400, John Burwell wrote: > Edison, > > I vote to take the latest stable from Amazon. In addition to keeping up with > security and bug fixes, it also ensures that we stay in sync with any > "refinements" that

Re: CloudStack News - Moving to Wednesday

We'll try to get it up as soon as the issues clear up. Matt On 7/9/13 9:06 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >Yes, there are some problems with roller instance (the underlying >software that blogs.a.o runs). Infrastructure has been discussing the >situation. >There is no immediate timeline on having

Review Request 12398: Add cookie field to UCS API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12398/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Animesh Chaturvedi. Bugs: 3432 Repository:

[ACS42] Three weeks to code freeze

Folks We are now just 3 weeks from ACS 4.2 code freeze on 7/29. We have around 400 open defects with 100+ blockers and critical and I expect another 200 new defects to come in. As a community we have been fixing roughly 100 defects per week, in order to clear up our backlog I request you to he

Review Request 12360: custom cpu model for kvm guest.the default model 'QEMU Virtual CPU version xxx' affect the activation of Windows OS and low performance.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12360/ --- Review request for cloudstack, edison su, soren, and Wei Zhou. Summary (updated

RE: [DISCUSS] If BVT breaks, revert the commits...

Sorry this took a little longer than expected with the holiday in US. Here's the first proposal [1] on the automated test system. Comments welcome. Specifically, I have one question on if we should have a staging branch for all release branches and master where all checkins go and the build

Error Message: Cloud Stack

I have started my cloudstack in advanced mode, however, during the process I am seeing this:2013-07-09 23:23:55,920 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:null) release cpu from host: 1, old used: 500,reserved: 0, actual total: 36256, total with overprovisioning: 36256; new used

  1   2   >