So, nobody uses q in q and cloudstack 4.1 ?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Valery Ciareszka
<valery.teres...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I use the following environment: CS 4.1, KVM, Centos 6.4
> (management+node1+node2), OpenIndiana NFS server as primary and secondary
> storage
> I have advanced networking in zone. I split management/public/guest
> traffic into different vlans, and use kvm network labels (bridge names):
> # cat /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties |grep device
> guest.network.device=cloudbrguest
> private.network.device=cloudbrmanage
> public.network.device=cloudbrpublic
>
> I have following network configuration:
> eth0+eth1=bond0
> eth2+eth3=bond1
>
> I use  vlan with id=211 on bond1 interface for guest traffic:
> cloudbrguest            8000.90e2ba317614       yes             vlan211
> cloudbrmanage           8000.90e2ba317614       yes             bond1.210
> cloudbrpublic           8000.90e2ba317614       yes             bond1.221
> cloudbrstor             8000.0025908814a4       yes             bond0
>
>
> The problem appeared after I have upgraded CS from 4.0.2 to 4.1.
>
> How it works in 4.0.2:
> -bridge interface cloudVirBr#VLANID is created on hypervisor, #VLANID -
> value from 1024 to 4096(is specified when creating zone), i.e.
> cloudVirBr1224
> -vlan interface vlan211.#VLANID is created on hypervisor and is plugged
> into cloudVirBr#VLANID
> I should had permitted 211 vlanid on switchports and all guest traffic
> (vlans 1024-4096) was encapsulated.
>
> How it works in 4.1:
> -bridge interface br#ETHNAME-#VLANID is created on hypervisor, where
> #VLANID - value from 1024 to 4096(is specified when creating zone) and
> #ETHNAME - name of device on top of which vlan will be created
> i.e. brbond1-1224
> -vlan interface bond1.#VLANID is created on hypervisor and is plugged into
> br#ETHNAME-#VLANID
> However, vlan interface is created on top of bond1 interface, while I
> would like it to be created on top of vlan211 (bond1.211)
> Now I should permit 1024-4096 vlanid on switchports, that is not
> convenient.
>
> How do I configure CS 4.1 so that it could work with guest vlans the same
> way as it had worked in CS 4.0 ?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Valery
>
> http://protocol.by/slayer
>



-- 
Regards,
Valery

http://protocol.by/slayer

Reply via email to