Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.3 based on RC1

+1 from me Peter On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > +1 for me > > Antoine > On May 11, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Nicolas Lalevée > wrote: > > > +1 for me > > > > Nicolas > > > > Le 11 mai 2014 à 12:42, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> delayed because I

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.3

+1 Peter On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > After investing some more time and doing a bootstrap build (thanks > Antoine): > > Running on Windows 7 64bit > Using Java 1.5 > C:\projekte\apache-ant\ANT_193>java -version > java version "1.5.0_22" > Java(TM) 2 Runtime

Re: [VOTE] Jean-Louis Boudart as a PMC member

+1 Peter On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Nicolas Lalevée < > nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org> wrote: > > > Jean-Louis has been around for a very long time, owned committership, > > contributed a lot to bring EasyAnt into the Ant PMC, and

Re: [VOTE] Charles Duffy as a committer

+1 Peter On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Martin Gainty wrote: > -Support your proposals in particular (and the project in general) > -Be diligent about squashing bugs (especially when they are out of > conformance with documented SPECs or JSRs) > -Be around nites and weekends (to take the loa

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.3 Based on RC1

+1 Peter On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2013-11-02, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > > > I was just surprised to see the license file in the common folder in > > the source archive rather at its root. But this is nit picking. > > I think this is common (no pun intended) to a

peter.kitt.reilly

http://adidas.dxsmedia.net/soicm/tlu.drdgwowxfbkjgiccff - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

peter.kitt.reilly

http://biggerpenissize.enhancementpills.co/eo/zhurcr.aermnb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.2

+1 Peter On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > +1; a contact at NetBeans did some sanity checking at my suggestion > (especially Javadoc generation on JDK 7u21 and 7u25) and said it was OK. > Thanks Stefan for taking the initiative on this! > > > > --

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.1 Release

+1 Peter On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > I plan to wait until Tuesday May 21st evening to release. > > Just in case - I have seen that Monday is a holiday for some of us. > > Regards, > > Antoine > > On May 19, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Michael Clarke wrote: > > > +1 from

Re: Adding if/unless conditions on commandline args

rent > solution if no one objects. > > 49036 add 'unless' attribute to JUnit test element was already solved > isn't it ? > > > > 2013/5/6 Peter Reilly > > > wow, I had forgot about that! > > > > Peter > > > > > > On Mon

Re: Adding if/unless conditions on commandline args

wow, I had forgot about that! Peter On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Hi, > > I have committed a patch created by Peter Reilly back in 2007. > > The bugzilla PR is 43362 [1] > > If the community is happy with this change we will be able to cl

Re: [VOTE] Michael Clarke as a committer

+1 Peter On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On 13 March 2013 04:03, Bruce Atherton wrote: > > > > I'd like to nominate Michael Clarke as a committer. Not only has he > revamped our testing infrastructure to make it compatible with JUnit4, he > has also worked on resolving

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

+1 Peter On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart < jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on the release as is too > Works perfectly in easyant :) > > > 2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig > > > +1 on the release as is. > > > > On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > > > > > You can veto

Re: deprecations

9 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > Hi Peter, > So does that mean you would be opposed to removing these deprecated items? > > Matt > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Peter Reilly > wrote: >> The only problem is the there are a lot >> of tasks out there in the wild th

Re: deprecations

The only problem is the there are a lot of tasks out there in the wild that have not been compiled in a very long time. (I know I have uses a number), These will most likely use the deprecated methods, especially in regard to handling of properties and references. Peter 2012/8/20 Martin Gainty :

Re: svn commit: r1373836 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/DeweyDecimal.java

java 6 allows @Override in this case, but java 5 does not. On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:53 PM, wrote: > Author: jglick > Date: Thu Aug 16 13:53:07 2012 > New Revision: 1373836 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1373836&view=rev > Log: > JDK 5 javac is apparently buggy; @Override should be al

Re: [VOTE] Drop JDK 1.4 after 1.8.3

+ 1 and move to 1.9 Yey, we may even dabble in these new fangled generics Peter On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2012-01-27, Jesse Glick wrote: >>> As suggested in 1.8.3 thread, I propose we drop JDK 1.4 s

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.1 based on RC1

+1 Peter On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 17:22, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> Should this be released as the Compress Antlib 1.1? >> > > +1 > > Conor > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.2 - second attempt

+1 Peter On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 15:15, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2011-08-13, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >>> svn tag (rev 1157319): >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/antlibs/antunit/tags/1.2/ >> >>> tarballs and README: >>> http://p

Re: ZIP64 Support

Personally I think that ant should move to java 1.5 for ant 1.9. Peter On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > ZIP64 is the nickname for the changes to the ZIP archive format that are > necessary to support files > 4GB (both individual entries and complete > archives

Re: antcontrib settings

You have not passed in the classpath to the taskdef. You need to do something like: On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Ajitesh wrote: > hi > I am trying to use the FOR loop present in antcontrib jar file - ant-contrib- > 1.0b3.jar in my build.xml; > but getting below error while ru

Re: svn commit: r1066963 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools: ant/ ant/taskdefs/ ant/taskdefs/cvslib/ ant/taskdefs/email/ ant/taskdefs/optional/ ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/ ant/taskdefs/o

It depends on the cost of .size(), it is done on each run of the body and cannot be optimized by the compiler (.size() could change during the loop). A common pattern is to do: for (int i = 0, len = x.size(); i < len; ++i) { ... } Peter On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert w

Re: [VOTE] Second Attempt to Release .NET Antlib 1.1

+1 Peter On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 16:02, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> Hi, >> >> after fixing the NOTICE file and applying the trademark policy I've >> rebuilt the distribution from svn revision 1064451 of >>

Re: Ant Eclipse integration

I thought that there was a problem with the removal of out-of-target reference resolution with moving to ant 1.8.0. ... ah, looking at the bug report, that is still an issue. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49659 Peter On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote

Re: [VOTE] third attempt - release of ant 1.8.2

+1 Peter On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-12-20, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > >> The first release candidate of ant 1.8.2 got several binding +1s and a >> -1 concerning an issue with the use of the JUnit task with selective >> methods and JUnit 4 style coding [1].

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bushel Donation

+1 Peter On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > the people behind Bushel[1] want to donate their code to Ivy[2] and > before I can start the formal IP clearance process we can and should > vote whether we want to accept the donation at all. > > So, do we want to accept t

Re: Vote to promote VSS antlib out of sandbox

+1 Peter On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote: >  +1 > > On 24/08/2010 11:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote: >> >> The VSS antlib[1] should be promoted from sandbox >> >> [1]http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/vss/ >> > > > --

Re: [VOTE] Apache Compress Antlib 1.0 - Take 2

+1 Peter On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote: >  +1 > > On 22/08/2010 10:15 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've created new distribution artifacts without the empty WHATSNEW file >> and a README.html that points to the docs directory. >> > >> I'd like to release this

Re: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set

We have a policy of keeping stupid historical defaults. Peter On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 08/18/2010 02:27 PM, Matt Benson wrote: >> >> I would still guess that more builds than not DON'T need to compile >> against Ant itself. > > Of course; at least an order of ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Manuals of Last Five Ant Releases

+1 release the manuals On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > I don't really think this requires a vote since I've just repackaged > existing distributions (see buildfile at the end of the mail for > details), but it won't hurt. > > In

Re: [VOTE] Remove commercial tasks from Ant

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Bruce Atherton wrote: > On 19/06/2010 11:38 AM, Bruce Atherton wrote: >> >> 1. Should the following commercial tasks be dropped from being distributed >> with the Ant release? >> >> [  ]  Continuous/Synergy tasks:  CCMCheckin, CCMCheckout, CCMCheckinTask, >> CCMRec

Re: [DISCUSS] Commercial Tasks in Ant

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote: > On 01/06/2010 7:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >> On 2010-05-29, Bruce Atherton wrote: >> >> >>> >>> I'd like to discuss whether to move all of the commercial tasks out of >>> Ant core/optional libraries and putting them each into their own

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split > into subtrees? > > [X] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to > conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. > > [ ] Yes, split it in

Re: Ant source structure and ant*.jar build products

That is not what I meant. I meant dependences for maven pom files. We would have an jar file (for example ant-commons-logging.jar that did not contain any classes) and have a pom file like: org.apache.ant ant-parent ../pom.xml 1.8.2 4.0.0 org.apache.ant ant-commons-l

Re: Ant source structure and ant*.jar build products

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Hello Jesse, > > > > Jesse Glick wrote: >> In relation to >> : >> >> Ironically enough, I find the Ant build script to be a poor example of >> an Ant script. The system of comp

Re: Ant source structure and ant*.jar build products

We could have dummy jar's for dependences. Peter On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 05/14/2010 04:00 PM, Peter Reilly wrote: >> >> Personally I think that there should be only one ant.jar file ... and not >> loads of itty-bitty ones. > > T

Re: Ant source structure and ant*.jar build products

Personally I think that there should be only one ant.jar file (as was the case in ant 1.5 - well two) and not loads of itty-bitty ones. Peter On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > In relation to : > > Ironically enough, I

Re: [VOTE] use nexus for maven upload of ant release

+1 to all and +1 to doc howto Peter On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote: > Hi, > >> This wasnt part of the vote, but I am also >> +1 for putting the upload procedure in a common.xml > > +1 > >> +1 for using Ivy for uploading > > +1 > >> +1 for including a src.zip into our dist

Re: includeantruntime warning (was: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1)

Just did not like the presence of the warning,since it will hit nearly every ant build file out there. Still it is in ant 1.8.0 so no need to change it now. Peter On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > Peter Reilly wrote: >> >> I am not too sure that I l

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

ok, scratch that, the warning happens for ant 1.8.0 as well :-( So +1 for the 1.8.1 release. Peter On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Peter Reilly wrote: > I am not too sure that I like the warning: > > /home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning: > 'includeantrun

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

I am not too sure that I like the warning: /home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds when using without setting the includeantruntime attribute. (not too sure if this was added

Re: [POLL] Bug 48804

+1 for fixing Peter On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-04-23, Dominique Devienne wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >>> [...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a bad thing, the old >>> behavior isn't documented and we s

Re: task that allows augmentation of previously declared references

I agree, datatypes are mutable, properties are not, why add this complexity of "final". Peter On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Hi, > > I was thinking that ant datatypes are currently de-facto mutable by default. > Maybe we are making this too complex. > Of course, o

Re: BZ 48768: Properties wrongly read from file or not update during read

Great news. Peter On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-02-24, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> To account for the bug report it may be a good idea to ignore existing >> properties only if we are importing with a prefix. > > and look for an existing property with the prefix

Re: BZ 48768: Properties wrongly read from file or not update during read

I think that we will just have to put the old code (1.7) back in. Peter On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-02-18, Matt Benson wrote: > >> This problem happens in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/property/ >> ResolvePropertyMap.java .  Peter, you extracted this class s

Re: Command Line Property Overrides Broken in trunk

Could be the change I made to the propertymap the other day. Peter On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > many of the latest Gump builds stopped working, see > and look at > those with "duration in state" equ

Re: BZ 48768: Properties wrongly read from file or not update during read

I think that I was trying to allow the map to be used in a stack of property maps. But looking at the original code for Property in 1.7, I got it wrong, so I have removed the test. Peter On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Peter Reilly wrote: > Looks like a bad bug. > > Will have a lo

Re: BZ 48768: Properties wrongly read from file or not update during read

Looks like a bad bug. Will have a look during the weekend. Peter On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Hello Matt, > >> Datum: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:27:26 -0600 >> Von: Matt Benson >> An: Ant Developers List > >> Convenience link: >> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/

Re: [VOTE] [second attempt] release of ant 1.8.0

I have installed and used 1.8 rc for our build env. Everything looks good. so +1 from me On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Martijn Kruithof wrote: > On 2-2-2010 2:12, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: >> >> The new build incorporates the fix for the junit stack traces issue. >> >> a candidate for ant 1

Re: Gertting "Reference not found" while using Ant 1.8 RC1

t; > I understand that I am doing something wrong here. I am new to Ant and I > don’t understand what a non-executed target is. > Can you please suggest what should be done to rectify the issue, while using > 1.8RC1? > > Thanks, > Suman.N > -Original Message- > From

Re: Gertting "Reference not found" while using Ant 1.8 RC1

When using ant 1.7, did you see a warning about references? Peter On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Suman N wrote: > Hi, > > > > We are testing the compatibility of our build scripts with Ant 1.8 RC1 and > we encounter the following error when referring a path refid in our script. > > > > > > D:\

Re: [VOTE] New committer - Jon Schneider

+1 Peter On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, wrote: > +1 > Jan > >>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >>Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:co...@apache.org] >>Gesendet: Montag, 2. November 2009 23:06 >>An: Ant Developers List >>Betreff: Re: [VOTE] New committer - Jon Schneider >> >>Matt Benson wrote: >>> Pl

Re: [VOTE] Promote the Compress Antlib

+1 Peter On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-10-09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> As a first step I propose to promote the Antlib from the sandbox to a >> proper Antlib. > > +1 > > Stefan > > - > To uns

Re: if/unless Attributes

using seems to be very very strange.. Peter On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-09-24, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> > >> will only be executed if a property named ${foo} exists (unexpanded) - >> in Ant 1.7.1. and Ant 1.8.0 - or if expanding ${foo} returns somethi

Re: PropertyHelper API

Yes, I think that I added the null return to allow local properties. Peter On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > > > --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> From: Stefan Bodewig >> Subject: PropertyHelper API >> To: dev@ant.apache.org >> Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009,

Re: ant-problem after upgrading from junit 4.4 to junit 4.6

It is very very unlikely that cobertura is the problem Most likely the use'r code was compiled against one version of junit and tested with a different version. Peter On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On 2009-05-14, Walter, Matthias wrote: > >> Hello th

Re: antlib namespace and uri usage

This is in the ant manual. http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/antlib.html#currentnamespace There is a special xml namespace (ant:current) for typedefs defined within an antlib. The namespace is only active during the processing of the antlib. Peter On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Gilles

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

Excellent. My tests have shown no problems. Peter On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > committed as revision 759138 > > Stefan > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote: > Hi, > >> with Ant 1.7.0 we changed the bzip2 code to make it a lot faster and >> reverted the change in 1.7.1 because it was creating corrupt archives. >> >> Meanwhile the Hadoop folks have been using the 1.7.0 code and claim >> they have fou

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

I am testing this patch at the moment. I am running the bz2 compress with the new code, uncompessing using the command line bunzip and comparing the files. The test is over ~100, 000 files, and I have had to use the computer for other things - so the test is not yet complete.

Re: schema for junit xml output

wrote: > Peter Reilly wrote: >> >> a question that has been asked a number of times on the hudson mailing >> list is what is the schema of the xml that junit generates. > > BTW: > > https://hudson.dev.java.net/

schema for junit xml output

a question that has been asked a number of times on the hudson mailing list is what is the schema of tthe xml that junit generates. I have had a quick look at the code, and noticed that there two related schemas. 1) the xml that generates and 2) the xml that uses internally. Both these formats

Re: svn commit: r743910 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java

Perhaps we should check the "target" attribute - but this is very much an edge case. Peter On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-02-18, Jesse Glick wrote: > >> Stefan Bodewig wrote: this should be the equivalent of compiling a package-info.java containing o

Re: svn commit: r743910 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java

The version is 1.5 - and it is not meant to be replaced! Peter On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, wrote: >> +private static final byte[] PACKAGE_INFO_CLASS_HEADER = { >> +(byte) 0xca, (byte) 0xfe, (byte) 0xba, (byte) 0xbe,

Re: svn commit: r743910 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java

Neat, that is a a brilliant solution! Peter On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:35 PM, wrote: > Author: jglick > Date: Thu Feb 12 22:35:18 2009 > New Revision: 743910 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=743910&view=rev > Log: > #43114: ensuring that package-info.class is created/touched when > p

Re: svn commit: r741089 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: main/org/apache/tools/bzip2/ main/org/apache/tools/tar/ main/org/apache/tools/zip/ tests/junit/org/apache/tools/zip/

some of the findbugs issues are a little too severe. Do we really need to copy the arrays?? Peter On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM, wrote: > Author: bodewig > Date: Thu Feb 5 12:30:01 2009 > New Revision: 741089 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=741089&view=rev > Log: > fix a bunch of

Re: which xml parse package that ant use?

Also sax is stream based - so the first errors that ant would see would be the fact that the first element is not "project" the malformed xml document would not be noticed at this stage as processing of the document would stop. Peter On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Java 1.4 as a minimum requirement for core/trunk

+1 since java1.3 has been eoled, and it would be nice to have nio available. On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is not that much based on features available (altho

Re: YUI Compressor Antlib

Fire away, this is what the sandbox is for. Peter On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > At work we have a need for this, so I've thrown it together just now > (very rough, but it does what it says on the tin). > > It's using the Yahoo JavaScript and C

Re: Compiling fails on JDK 1.3

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I found the vote that we dropped Java 1.2 >> http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=117794737813795&w=2 > > Great, thanks. > > >> Should we post these info in a more

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1

+1 Peter On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > since no new issues have been found with the beta that has been out > for three weeks, I've created archives from the same code base and > uploaded them to http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antunit11

Re: DirectoryScanner and Symlinks

Is it not costly (as in very costly) to get the canonical path ? I would be for the lowest tech possible here. Peter On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> as Issue 45499 shows

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

+1 Peter On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > just in case your mail client doesn't like the way our mailing list > manager deals with multipart/signed messages (just like mine, it > simply doesn't see the

Re: svn commit: r688729 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/ComponentHelper.java

yikes! Peter On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: bodewig > Date: Mon Aug 25 07:04:01 2008 > New Revision: 688729 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=688729&view=rev > Log: > reallyput the value into the map. > > Modified: >ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/ap

Re: AntUnit 1.1?

sounds good (am catching up on my e-mail queue). Peter On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ant's trunk has been using a snapshot of AntUnit's trunk for quite >> some time now, so we seem to need some unreleased feature. How about >> making it available t

Re: Locking in Project and PropertyHelper

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I suggest the following changes: >> >> * lock the listener collection in the add/remove listener methods, >> in fireMessageLogged lock the listeners, cl

Re: 1.7.7 DOMUtilTest fixed

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I finally got the time to work out what was wrong with the DOMUtilTest failure > > I should have some time to look into the other failures for 1.7.1 - > but this was the only new failure since the last beta release >

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

This is due to: [au:antunit] Build File: /srv/gump/public/workspace/ant/src/tests/antunit/types/scriptcondition-test.xml [au:antunit] Tests run: 16, Failures: 0, Errors: 14, Time elapsed: 0.316 sec [au:antunit] Target: testBeanshellReturnTrue caused an ERROR [au:antunit]at line 100, column 42

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

I have seen this once or twice, but have no idea why it happens. Peter On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's ExecTaskTest failing and I have no idea why. > > Some kind of race condition that might get LeadPipeInputstream get > closed before it shoul

Re: test-ant is fixed in Gump

Thanks Peter On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > for those who haven't noticed: Since I disabled execution of the > FailureRecorder test when running JUnit4 test-ant now passes in Gump. > This means every nag mail generated for test-ant hin

Re: Fixing some naming inconsistencies in Ivy

ant attribute names are case insensitive. I do not like long attribute names - although I have created a fair few my self. Peter On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > X

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

+1 from me. Peter On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >> Author: peterreilly > > >> Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008 > > >> New Revision: 641903 >

Re: Can I Test the NPE Bug?

As far as I am aware, there is currently no nightly build. The easiest way to get a version is to check out the ant trunk and compile it yourself. -> use java5 to have the same compiler as the ant release [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ echo $JAVA_HOME /usr/java/jdk5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mkdir y [EMAIL PR

Re: Should ScriptRunner call terminate() on the BSFManager?

do anything to follow up on this? How to ensure this fix > gets into a future release? > > thanks > > paul > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: ext Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:52 PM > >

Re: Should ScriptRunner call terminate() on the BSFManager?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Paul King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We've recently integrated Jepp (http://jepp.sourceforge.net/) into our > > use of Ant via the BSF engine. This is very useful because we use Python > > for scripting quite a lot a

Re: svn commit: r640878 - in /ant/ivy/core/trunk: CHANGES.txt RELEASE_NOTES

Text files do not specify an encoding. It this utf-8 or win1252 or latin1 ? Peter On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: hibou > Date: Tue Mar 25 09:11:41 2008 > New Revision: 640878 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=640878&view=rev > Log: > Encoding fi

Re: [Vote] 1.7.1beta2

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Available tarballs at http://people.apache.org/dist/ant/v1.7.1beta2/ > > are ready: > > > > yes [ x ] (+1) > > no [ ] (-1) > > +1 > +1 Peter > St

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project bootstrap-ant (in module ant) failed

Opps, sorry, I commited an jar that was compiled with > javac5. Fixed now. Peter On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Gump Integration Build <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more information please visit http:

netrexx and image optional tasks

HI all, I have gone tru the optional ant tasks/types with a view to allow an complete automatic compilation of ant from svn and use of fetch.xml. In current ant trunk, only the netrxx and image optional tasks cannot be so built. netrexx: (http://www-306.ibm.com/software/awdtools/netrexx/download

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34005] spellcheck results from ant.apache.org manual

Is is possible to revert these changes (unassinged -> 1.8.0) Most of these "bugs" will not get fixed in ant 1.8.0 and setting the target release ensures that when ant 1.8.0 comes around, the bugs have to be updated again). (In general I do not like the custom of mass updates of the bug database

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44630] Small error in doc (due to variable expansion?)

Yes, I have made a change to the build.xml file. It is up to kev to see if this should be in the ant 1.7.1 release. Peter On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Vladimir Mihai Pacuraru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > Good catch. > > This problem is in the docs directory of the tar.* > > (or

Re: Ant 1.7.1beta available

Hi Kev, I see that you have updated the beta (to 2). http://people.apache.org/~kevj/ant/ant-1.7.1beta2.tar.gz Peter On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've started to make the 1.7 b

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing. > > good. > > > Over to the vote: > > That's not how this works. You create the t

Re: bug: jar task with nested service does not create META-INF/services

Thanks, this has already been noticed and a fix will be in ant 1.7.1. In the meantime, the nested element should not be used. Peter On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Robert Koberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use the nested service element in the jar class. It > produce

Re: 1.7.1 - Beta Vote

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Loughran wrote: > > Kevin Jackson wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late). > >> > >> I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks. > >> > >> T

Re: xmlproperties task

ANT svn (trunk) supports loadFromXML in the properties task. This has not been ported to the ANT 1.7 branch. Peter On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:56 -0800, Bruce Atherton wrote: > > What I think you are missing is that the

Re: 1.7.1 - Beta Vote

x yes +1 Peter On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late). > > I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks. > > The current 1.7.1 trunk is now locked for further changes (99

Re: The Cactus/JUnit-Task problem

This sounds excellent. However, since Cactus replaces the execute method, would it not need to add code to call setupJUnitDelegate() Peter On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > [Petar, it would be good if you subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it

Re: [VOTE] add Nicolas Lalevée as committer

On Feb 13, 2008 3:06 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 13, 2008 3:35 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Even though only votes cast by PMC members are binding [12], all votes are > > welcome and important to us. > > +1. --DD +1 Peter > > >

Re: AW: Need documentation change for if / unless

Mmm, the manual states: """ A target also has the ability to perform its execution if (or unless) a property has been set. This allows, for example, better control on the building process depending on the state of the system (java version, OS, command-line property defines, etc.). To make a target

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >