The version is 1.5 - and it is not meant to be replaced!
Peter
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Dominique Devienne <ddevie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, <jgl...@apache.org> wrote:
>> + private static final byte[] PACKAGE_INFO_CLASS_HEADER = {
>> + (byte) 0xca, (byte) 0xfe, (byte) 0xba, (byte) 0xbe, 0x00, 0x00,
>> 0x00,
>> + 0x31, 0x00, 0x07, 0x07, 0x00, 0x05, 0x07, 0x00, 0x06, 0x01, 0x00,
>> 0x0a,
>> + 0x53, 0x6f, 0x75, 0x72, 0x63, 0x65, 0x46, 0x69, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x01,
>> 0x00,
>> + 0x11, 0x70, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x61, 0x67, 0x65, 0x2d, 0x69, 0x6e,
>> 0x66,
>> + 0x6f, 0x2e, 0x6a, 0x61, 0x76, 0x61, 0x01
>> + };
>> + private static final byte[] PACKAGE_INFO_CLASS_FOOTER = {
>> + 0x2f, 0x70, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x61, 0x67, 0x65, 0x2d, 0x69, 0x6e,
>> 0x66,
>> + 0x6f, 0x01, 0x00, 0x10, 0x6a, 0x61, 0x76, 0x61, 0x2f, 0x6c, 0x61,
>> 0x6e,
>> + 0x67, 0x2f, 0x4f, 0x62, 0x6a, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x02, 0x00, 0x00,
>> 0x01,
>> + 0x00, 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00,
>> 0x03,
>> + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x00, 0x04
>> + };
>
> What Java version is this fake class in?
>
> I suppose it doesn't matter much, as it's meant to be replaced, right?
>
> Just curuous. --DD
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
