Is it not costly (as in very costly) to get the canonical path ?

I would be for the lowest  tech possible here.

Peter


On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> as Issue 45499 shows DirectoryScanner can run into infinite loops by
>> symbolic links that point to parent directories of the scanned
>> directory.
>
> Instead of trying to track traversed directories using a stack or set,
> what about a low-tech max-symlink-hops check (and fileset attribute),
> defaulting to say 5, to break out of the infinite loop? --DD
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to