+1 for fixing Peter On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2010-04-23, Dominique Devienne <ddevie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> [...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a bad thing, the old >>> behavior isn't documented and we shouldn't even try to keep it. > >> I agree. Fixing the primary use-case trumps this particular behavior. >> If we can't fix the bug without allow this "ahead-of-time" use of the >> extension point, it's no big deal to me. > > Technically we could also disallow it, but it would take some additional > effort that I'm not sure is worth it, that's why I started this poll. > > Thanks > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
