On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Kevin Jackson <foamd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> with Ant 1.7.0 we changed the bzip2 code to make it a lot faster and >> reverted the change in 1.7.1 because it was creating corrupt archives. >> >> Meanwhile the Hadoop folks have been using the 1.7.0 code and claim >> they have found and fixed the problem (a single + 1 missing somewhere >> IIUC). >> >> I think we have a unit test that failed with the 1.7.0 code and passes >> with 1.7.1 - should we give the Hadoop fixed code a second chance if >> it passes all our tests? > > If it passes our tests (and Peter's extended test), why should we not > use it? +1 from me > +1 from me.
Peter > Kev > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
