Re: using Ivy without the xml files

Ramakrishnan, How did you go with your investigations of Ivy with Clojure? Peter West And at the end of eight days, when he was circumcised, he was called Jesus... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.3 based on RC1

+1 from me Peter On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > +1 for me > > Antoine > On May 11, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Nicolas Lalevée > wrote: > > > +1 for me > > > > Nicolas > > > > Le 11 mai 2014 à 12:42, Stefan Bodewig a écri

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.3

+1 Peter On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > After investing some more time and doing a bootstrap build (thanks > Antoine): > > Running on Windows 7 64bit > Using Java 1.5 > C:\projekte\apache-ant\ANT_193>java -version > java version "1.5

Re: [VOTE] Jean-Louis Boudart as a PMC member

+1 Peter On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Nicolas Lalevée < > nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org> wrote: > > > Jean-Louis has been around for a very long time, owned committership, > > contributed a lot to bri

Re: [VOTE] Charles Duffy as a committer

+1 Peter On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Martin Gainty wrote: > -Support your proposals in particular (and the project in general) > -Be diligent about squashing bugs (especially when they are out of > conformance with documented SPECs or JSRs) > -Be around nites and weekends

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.3 Based on RC1

+1 Peter On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2013-11-02, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > > > I was just surprised to see the license file in the common folder in > > the source archive rather at its root. But this is nit picking. > > I think this is com

peter.kitt.reilly

http://adidas.dxsmedia.net/soicm/tlu.drdgwowxfbkjgiccff - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

peter.kitt.reilly

http://biggerpenissize.enhancementpills.co/eo/zhurcr.aermnb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.2

+1 Peter On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > +1; a contact at NetBeans did some sanity checking at my suggestion > (especially Javadoc generation on JDK 7u21 and 7u25) and said it was OK. > Thanks Stefan for taking the initiativ

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.1 Release

+1 Peter On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > I plan to wait until Tuesday May 21st evening to release. > > Just in case - I have seen that Monday is a holiday for some of us. > > Regards, > > Antoine > > On May 19, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Michael

Re: Adding if/unless conditions on commandline args

The problem of not using namespaces is that they would not be backward compatible. Also the attributes are 'magic' and we already have 'id' as a magic attribute, which makes task code hard to reason about. Peter p.s, I really hate xml namespaces! On Thu, May 9, 2013 at

Re: Adding if/unless conditions on commandline args

wow, I had forgot about that! Peter On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Hi, > > I have committed a patch created by Peter Reilly back in 2007. > > The bugzilla PR is 43362 [1] > > If the community is happy with this change we will be able to cl

Re: [VOTE] Michael Clarke as a committer

+1 Peter On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On 13 March 2013 04:03, Bruce Atherton wrote: > > > > I'd like to nominate Michael Clarke as a committer. Not only has he > revamped our testing infrastructure to make it compatible with JUnit4,

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

+1 Peter On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart < jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on the release as is too > Works perfectly in easyant :) > > > 2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig > > > +1 on the release as is. > > > > On 2013-03-08, Ant

Re: deprecations

. However for deprecated methods that need to be removed because it would be impossible to implement with newer and better implementations, I would have no problem with (perhaps using an implementation that throws an UnsupportedOperationException("dead api"). Peter On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:1

Re: deprecations

The only problem is the there are a lot of tasks out there in the wild that have not been compiled in a very long time. (I know I have uses a number), These will most likely use the deprecated methods, especially in regard to handling of properties and references. Peter 2012/8/20 Martin Gainty

Re: svn commit: r1373836 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/DeweyDecimal.java

java 6 allows @Override in this case, but java 5 does not. On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:53 PM, wrote: > Author: jglick > Date: Thu Aug 16 13:53:07 2012 > New Revision: 1373836 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1373836&view=rev > Log: > JDK 5 javac is apparently buggy; @Override should be al

Re: [VOTE] Drop JDK 1.4 after 1.8.3

+ 1 and move to 1.9 Yey, we may even dabble in these new fangled generics Peter On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2012-01-27, Jesse Glick wrote: >>> As suggested in 1.8.3 thread, I propo

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.1 based on RC1

+1 Peter On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 17:22, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> Should this be released as the Compress Antlib 1.1? >> > > +1 > > Conor > > --

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.2 - second attempt

+1 Peter On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 15:15, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2011-08-13, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >>> svn tag (rev 1157319): >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/antlibs/antunit/tags/1.2/ >

Re: ZIP64 Support

Personally I think that ant should move to java 1.5 for ant 1.9. Peter On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > ZIP64 is the nickname for the changes to the ZIP archive format that are > necessary to support files > 4GB (both individual entri

Re: antcontrib settings

You have not passed in the classpath to the taskdef. You need to do something like: On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Ajitesh wrote: > hi > I am trying to use the FOR loop present in antcontrib jar file - ant-contrib- > 1.0b3.jar in my build.xml; > but getting below error while ru

Re: svn commit: r1066963 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools: ant/ ant/taskdefs/ ant/taskdefs/cvslib/ ant/taskdefs/email/ ant/taskdefs/optional/ ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/ ant/taskdefs/o

It depends on the cost of .size(), it is done on each run of the body and cannot be optimized by the compiler (.size() could change during the loop). A common pattern is to do: for (int i = 0, len = x.size(); i < len; ++i) { ... } Peter On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Antoine Levy-Lamb

Re: [VOTE] Second Attempt to Release .NET Antlib 1.1

+1 Peter On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 16:02, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> Hi, >> >> after fixing the NOTICE file and applying the trademark policy I've >> rebuilt the distribution from svn revision 1064451 of >

Re: Ant Eclipse integration

I thought that there was a problem with the removal of out-of-target reference resolution with moving to ant 1.8.0. ... ah, looking at the bug report, that is still an issue. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49659 Peter On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert

Re: [VOTE] third attempt - release of ant 1.8.2

+1 Peter On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-12-20, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > >> The first release candidate of ant 1.8.2 got several binding +1s and a >> -1 concerning an issue with the use of the JUnit task with selective >> methods and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bushel Donation

+1 Peter On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > the people behind Bushel[1] want to donate their code to Ivy[2] and > before I can start the formal IP clearance process we can and should > vote whether we want to accept the donation at all. > > So,

Re: Vote to promote VSS antlib out of sandbox

+1 Peter On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote: >  +1 > > On 24/08/2010 11:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote: >> >> The VSS antlib[1] should be promoted from sandbox >> >> [1]http://svn.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Compress Antlib 1.0 - Take 2

+1 Peter On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote: >  +1 > > On 22/08/2010 10:15 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've created new distribution artifacts without the empty WHATSNEW file >> and a README.html that points to the docs

Re: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set

We have a policy of keeping stupid historical defaults. Peter On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 08/18/2010 02:27 PM, Matt Benson wrote: >> >> I would still guess that more builds than not DON'T need to compile >> against Ant itself. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Manuals of Last Five Ant Releases

+1 release the manuals On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > I don't really think this requires a vote since I've just repackaged > existing distributions (see buildfile at the end of the mail for > details), but it won't hurt. > > In

Re: [VOTE] Remove commercial tasks from Ant

n the sandbox? >> >> [  ]  +1 = Yes, establish one new Antlib in the sandbox for each task >> dropped >>      -1 = No, just drop the commercial tasks altogether from Ant > > +1 +1 Peter > > > --

Re: [DISCUSS] Commercial Tasks in Ant

I can add CVS to the list if there are no objections. Any other tasks to > nominate for transfer to an antlib? ekk no, I think that a lot of build scripts in the wild depend on the cvs tasks, and would be quite expensive to fix if they are to be moved to an antlib, we should have an ivy (or sim

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split > into subtrees? > > [X] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to > conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. > > [ ] Yes, split it in

Re: Ant source structure and ant*.jar build products

needed. Peter On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:17 AM, wrote: >>We could have dummy jar's for dependences. >>Peter > > You could use https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/mocks ;-) > > Jan > >

Re: Ant source structure and ant*.jar build products

ies can be > downloaded using ant -f fetch.xml. > I would not check in jars under lib/optional. I am not sure what we can > do about NetRexx and jai. How to contact IBM to get them to publish the > NetRexx jars to a public repository with a BSD license ? Same for > Oracle-Sun concernin

Re: Ant source structure and ant*.jar build products

We could have dummy jar's for dependences. Peter On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 05/14/2010 04:00 PM, Peter Reilly wrote: >> >> Personally I think that there should be only one ant.jar file ... and not >> loads of itty-bitty ones. > > T

Re: Ant source structure and ant*.jar build products

Personally I think that there should be only one ant.jar file (as was the case in ant 1.5 - well two) and not loads of itty-bitty ones. Peter On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > In relation to <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287>: > > Ironi

Re: [VOTE] use nexus for maven upload of ant release

+1 to all and +1 to doc howto Peter On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote: > Hi, > >> This wasnt part of the vote, but I am also >> +1 for putting the upload procedure in a common.xml > > +1 > >> +1 for using Ivy for uploading > > +1 &

Re: includeantruntime warning (was: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1)

Just did not like the presence of the warning,since it will hit nearly every ant build file out there. Still it is in ant 1.8.0 so no need to change it now. Peter On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > Peter Reilly wrote: >> >> I am not too sure that I l

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

ok, scratch that, the warning happens for ant 1.8.0 as well :-( So +1 for the 1.8.1 release. Peter On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Peter Reilly wrote: > I am not too sure that I like the warning: > > /home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning: > 'includeantrun

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

was added in ant 1.8 or ant 1.8.1) Peter On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote: > +1 no issue here with easyant > > Regards, > > 2010/5/1 Antoine Levy-Lambert > >> Hi, >> >> I have uploaded a candidate for ant 1.8.1 under &

Re: [POLL] Bug 48804

+1 for fixing Peter On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-04-23, Dominique Devienne wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >>> [...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a bad thing, the old >>

Re: minor bug?

Hi Maarten, thank you for this fix! It works after building the project from svn trunk. BTW the wiki doc at http://ant.apache.org/ivy/wiki.html points into the nirvana ... Regards, Peter. It should be ok now in SVN trunk. Could you give it a try? thanks, Maarten - Original Message

Re: minor bug?

username is a bit complicated ... Regards, Peter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

minor bug?

repository with the underscore? Renaming this awkward username is a bit complicated ... Regards, Peter. -- Free your timetabling! http://timefinder.sourceforge.net/

Re: task that allows augmentation of previously declared references

I agree, datatypes are mutable, properties are not, why add this complexity of "final". Peter On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Hi, > > I was thinking that ant datatypes are currently de-facto mutable by default. > Maybe we are making this to

Re: BZ 48768: Properties wrongly read from file or not update during read

Great news. Peter On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-02-24, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> To account for the bug report it may be a good idea to ignore existing >> properties only if we are importing with a prefix. > > and look for an ex

Re: BZ 48768: Properties wrongly read from file or not update during read

I think that we will just have to put the old code (1.7) back in. Peter On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-02-18, Matt Benson wrote: > >> This problem happens in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/property/ >> ResolvePropertyMap.java .  Peter, you ex

Re: Command Line Property Overrides Broken in trunk

Could be the change I made to the propertymap the other day. Peter On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > many of the latest Gump builds stopped working, see > <http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/project_todos.html> and look at > those wi

Re: BZ 48768: Properties wrongly read from file or not update during read

I think that I was trying to allow the map to be used in a stack of property maps. But looking at the original code for Property in 1.7, I got it wrong, so I have removed the test. Peter On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Peter Reilly wrote: > Looks like a bad bug. > > Will have a lo

Re: BZ 48768: Properties wrongly read from file or not update during read

Looks like a bad bug. Will have a look during the weekend. Peter On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Hello Matt, > >> Datum: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:27:26 -0600 >> Von: Matt Benson >> An: Ant Developers List > >> Convenience link: >

Re: [VOTE] [second attempt] release of ant 1.8.0

I have installed and used 1.8 rc for our build env. Everything looks good. so +1 from me On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Martijn Kruithof wrote: > On 2-2-2010 2:12, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: >> >> The new build incorporates the fix for the junit stack traces issue. >> >> a candidate for ant 1

Re: Gertting "Reference not found" while using Ant 1.8 RC1

.. and the ant code to do this was difficult to maintain. So on ant 1.7 the big dirty warning message was placed in - and many years later (the "future" in the warning message), the hacking code in ant has been removed. Peter On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Suman N wrote: > Hi, >

Re: Gertting "Reference not found" while using Ant 1.8 RC1

When using ant 1.7, did you see a warning about references? Peter On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Suman N wrote: > Hi, > > > > We are testing the compatibility of our build scripts with Ant 1.8 RC1 and > we encounter the following error when referring a path refid in our scr

Re: [VOTE] New committer - Jon Schneider

+1 Peter On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, wrote: > +1 > Jan > >>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >>Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:co...@apache.org] >>Gesendet: Montag, 2. November 2009 23:06 >>An: Ant Developers List >>Betreff: Re: [VOTE] New committer

Re: [VOTE] Promote the Compress Antlib

+1 Peter On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-10-09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> As a first step I propose to promote the Antlib from the sandbox to a >> proper Antlib. > > +1 > > Stefan > > --

Re: if/unless Attributes

using seems to be very very strange.. Peter On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-09-24, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> > >> will only be executed if a property named ${foo} exists (unexpanded) - >> in Ant 1.7.1. and Ant 1.8.0 - or

Re: PropertyHelper API

Yes, I think that I added the null return to allow local properties. Peter On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > > > --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> From: Stefan Bodewig >> Subject: PropertyHelper API >> To: dev@ant.apache.org >&

Feature Request - Overridable resolvers

The ivy configuration I am currently have is where all projects include a global ivy settings file, which is pretty much the same as the default ivy settings. (The whole setup is like the multi-project example but using our own set of global ivy settings files) Here is the dump of the resolver

Re: ant-problem after upgrading from junit 4.4 to junit 4.6

It is very very unlikely that cobertura is the problem Most likely the use'r code was compiled against one version of junit and tested with a different version. Peter On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On 2009-05-14, Walter, Matthias wro

Re: antlib namespace and uri usage

This is in the ant manual. http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/antlib.html#currentnamespace There is a special xml namespace (ant:current) for typedefs defined within an antlib. The namespace is only active during the processing of the antlib. Peter On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Gilles

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

Excellent. My tests have shown no problems. Peter On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > committed as revision 759138 > > Stefan > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.or

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

l our tests? > > If it passes our tests (and Peter's extended test), why should we not > use it?  +1 from me > +1 from me. Peter > Kev > > - > To unsubscribe, e-

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

It looks good at the moment. Peter On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > with Ant 1.7.0 we changed the bzip2 code to make it a lot faster and > reverted the change in 1.7.1 because it was creating corrupt archives. > > Meanwhile the Ha

Re: schema for junit xml output

The google-test people are going to to change the output from to (with a command-line switch). They have some extra attributes, and do not populate some attributes and elements. but the output is understood by hudson without mod to hudson. Peter. On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Jesse Glick

schema for junit xml output

ment testsuites { testsuite* } #------ Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r743910 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java

Perhaps we should check the "target" attribute - but this is very much an edge case. Peter On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-02-18, Jesse Glick wrote: > >> Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>>> this should be the equivalent of compiling a

Re: svn commit: r743910 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java

The version is 1.5 - and it is not meant to be replaced! Peter On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, wrote: >> +private static final byte[] PACKAGE_INFO_CLASS_HEADER = { >> +(byte) 0xca, (byte) 0xfe, (byte) 0x

Re: svn commit: r743910 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java

Neat, that is a a brilliant solution! Peter On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:35 PM, wrote: > Author: jglick > Date: Thu Feb 12 22:35:18 2009 > New Revision: 743910 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=743910&view=rev > Log: > #43114: ensuring that package-info.clas

Re: svn commit: r741089 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: main/org/apache/tools/bzip2/ main/org/apache/tools/tar/ main/org/apache/tools/zip/ tests/junit/org/apache/tools/zip/

some of the findbugs issues are a little too severe. Do we really need to copy the arrays?? Peter On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM, wrote: > Author: bodewig > Date: Thu Feb 5 12:30:01 2009 > New Revision: 741089 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=741089&view=rev &

Re: which xml parse package that ant use?

Also sax is stream based - so the first errors that ant would see would be the fact that the first element is not "project" the malformed xml document would not be noticed at this stage as processing of the document would stop. Peter On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Stefan Bodew

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Java 1.4 as a minimum requirement for core/trunk

+1 since java1.3 has been eoled, and it would be nice to have nio available. On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is not that much based on features available (altho

Re: YUI Compressor Antlib

Fire away, this is what the sandbox is for. Peter On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > At work we have a need for this, so I've thrown it together just now > (very rough, but it does what it says on the tin). > > It

Re: Compiling fails on JDK 1.3

release of 1.7.0, and was due to the fact that the java5 javac compiler is unable to generate correct bytecode for 1.2. - so the breaking change is in Ant 1.7.0. Peter > >> Like FAQ? > > Will do, alongside a comment that we don't really test old Java > releases and on

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1

+1 Peter On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > since no new issues have been found with the beta that has been out > for three weeks, I've created archives from the same code base and > uploaded them to http://

Re: DirectoryScanner and Symlinks

Is it not costly (as in very costly) to get the canonical path ? I would be for the lowest tech possible here. Peter On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &g

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

+1 Peter On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > just in case your mail client doesn't like the way our mailing list > manager deals with multipart/signed messages (just like min

Re: svn commit: r688729 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/ComponentHelper.java

yikes! Peter On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: bodewig > Date: Mon Aug 25 07:04:01 2008 > New Revision: 688729 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=688729&view=rev > Log: > reallyput the value into the map. > > Modif

Re: AntUnit 1.1?

sounds good (am catching up on my e-mail queue). Peter On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ant's trunk has been using a snapshot of AntUnit's trunk for quite >> some time now, so we seem to need some unreleased feature. How

Re: Locking in Project and PropertyHelper

the project object would not help as multiple threads could call the add/remove method at the same time. We would need something like jdk5's CopyOnWriteArrayList to do this correctly. Peter > > Stefan > > -

Re: 1.7.7 DOMUtilTest fixed

ce the last beta release > > I would like to start the process for the full release since the beta > has been available for some time now. > > Thoughts? Go for it. Peter > > Kev > > - > To unsubscrib

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

This is due to: [au:antunit] Build File: /srv/gump/public/workspace/ant/src/tests/antunit/types/scriptcondition-test.xml [au:antunit] Tests run: 16, Failures: 0, Errors: 14, Time elapsed: 0.316 sec [au:antunit] Target: testBeanshellReturnTrue caused an ERROR [au:antunit]at line 100, column 42

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

I have seen this once or twice, but have no idea why it happens. Peter On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's ExecTaskTest failing and I have no idea why. > > Some kind of race condition that might get LeadPipeInputstream get

Re: test-ant is fixed in Gump

Thanks Peter On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > for those who haven't noticed: Since I disabled execution of the > FailureRecorder test when running JUnit4 test-ant now passes in Gump. > This means every nag m

Re: Fixing some naming inconsistencies in Ivy

ant attribute names are case insensitive. I do not like long attribute names - although I have created a fair few my self. Peter On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

+1 from me. Peter On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >> Author: peterreilly > > >> Date: Thu M

Re: Can I Test the NPE Bug?

dir}/lib/optional by hand - bsf.jar, etc) rm -rf bootstrap# Just in case this contains old classes from a previous build ./build.sh # This will make an distributable in ${basedir}/dist export ANT_HOME=~/y/ant-trunk/dist and check.. Peter On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Rob

Re: Should ScriptRunner call terminate() on the BSFManager?

webtest usage to ensure that any fix not not impact on projects that extend ant's java classes. - these are the kind of things that are done when something like this is fixed - and it is time consuming. Peter On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:23 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do I need to

Re: Should ScriptRunner call terminate() on the BSFManager?

what gets called where in Ant at the > moment. Just noting an important use case for WebTest which I know is > in use in the field in many places. It should be possible to modify the scripting code in such a way that will not a

Re: svn commit: r640878 - in /ant/ivy/core/trunk: CHANGES.txt RELEASE_NOTES

Text files do not specify an encoding. It this utf-8 or win1252 or latin1 ? Peter On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: hibou > Date: Tue Mar 25 09:11:41 2008 > New Revision: 640878 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=640878&vie

Re: [Vote] 1.7.1beta2

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Available tarballs at http://people.apache.org/dist/ant/v1.7.1beta2/ > > are ready: > > > > yes [ x ]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project bootstrap-ant (in module ant) failed

Opps, sorry, I commited an jar that was compiled with > javac5. Fixed now. Peter On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Gump Integration Build <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more informat

netrexx and image optional tasks

ke to vote on moving the optional jars to separate antlibs for ant 1.8.0 (in the same way as weblogic and starteam tasks are being moved (abeit slowly)). What do people think? Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34005] spellcheck results from ant.apache.org manual

bug database when a release is being made - a lot of information can be lost. For example, there were a lot of found in 1.7..0betax that were updated to found in ant 1.7.0, and in fact the bug - although preseent in the beta was also present in ant 1.4.) Peter On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:23

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44630] Small error in doc (due to variable expansion?)

Yes, I have made a change to the build.xml file. It is up to kev to see if this should be in the ant 1.7.1 release. Peter On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Vladimir Mihai Pacuraru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > Good catch. > > This problem is in the d

Re: Ant 1.7.1beta available

Hi Kev, I see that you have updated the beta (to 2). http://people.apache.org/~kevj/ant/ant-1.7.1beta2.tar.gz Peter On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I&#x

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta

; > That's not how this works. You create the tasballs (and zips) and we > vote on them. > Yep, we need the tarballs. Peter > > > Despite the strange bug Steve uncovered for networked drives on > > Windows, Ant 1.7.1 is ready for beta: > > Yes, I'll

Re: bug: jar task with nested service does not create META-INF/services

Thanks, this has already been noticed and a fix will be in ant 1.7.1. In the meantime, the nested element should not be used. Peter On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Robert Koberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use the nested service element in th

Re: 1.7.1 - Beta Vote

ache/tools/ant/launch/Launcher.class"; > String resolved=Locator.fromJarURI(jarURI); > assertResolved(jarURI,launcher,resolved,true); > } > > Either we're pasting in the CWD in front, or new File() is doing it for us. Does this happen in ant 1.7.0 ? I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >