ai wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Left some comments on the AIP, no major concerns, just some
>>>> thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>
t;>>> +1 binding.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Left some comments on the AIP, no major concerns, just some
>>> thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not a huge fan of using "human" as discussed abo
+1 binding
gt; >>> having a
> > > >>>>> set of "interactive" operators makes sense?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks & Regards,
> > > >>>>> Amogh Desai
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks & Regards,
> > >>>>> Amogh Desai
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:48 AM Rahul Vats
> wrote:
&g
gt;
> >>>>> Thanks & Regards,
> >>>>> Amogh Desai
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:48 AM Rahul Vats wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 binding
> >&g
> +1 binding
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Rahul Vats
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 11:26, Phani Kumar <
>> phani.ku...@astronomer.io
>>>>>> .invalid
ani Kumar <
> phani.ku...@astronomer.io
> > > > > .invalid>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan
; On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 11:26, Phani Kumar > > > .invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 binding
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
>
; Rahul Vats
> > >
> > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 11:26, Phani Kumar > > .invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy
> > > wrote:
> > >
.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 binding.
> > > >
> > > > From: Aritra Basu
> > >
;
> > > From: Aritra Basu
> > > Sent: 05 June 2025 00:53
> > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
> > >
> > > +1 non binding from me as well
> > > --
>
00:53
> > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
> >
> > +1 non binding from me as well
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Aritra Basu
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:19 am Ankit Chaurasia,
> wrote:
> >
> > >
+1 binding
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy wrote:
> +1 binding.
>
> From: Aritra Basu
> Sent: 05 June 2025 00:53
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
>
> +1 non binding from me as well
+1 binding.
From: Aritra Basu
Sent: 05 June 2025 00:53
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
+1 non binding from me as well
--
Regards,
Aritra Basu
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:19 am Ankit Chaurasia, wrote:
> +1 non-bind
+1 non binding from me as well
--
Regards,
Aritra Basu
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:19 am Ankit Chaurasia, wrote:
> +1 non-binding.
>
> *Ankit Chaurasia*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:51 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 23:07, Vincent Beck wrote:
> >
> >
+1 non-binding.
*Ankit Chaurasia*
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:51 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 23:07, Vincent Beck wrote:
>
> > +1 binding. Looks really good!
> >
> > On 2025/06/04 16:45:24 "Oliveira, Niko" wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Over
+1 binding
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 23:07, Vincent Beck wrote:
> +1 binding. Looks really good!
>
> On 2025/06/04 16:45:24 "Oliveira, Niko" wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > Overall it looks great! I left some comments on the AIP document, but
> nothing that would block a +1
> >
> > Cheers,
>
+1 binding. Looks really good!
On 2025/06/04 16:45:24 "Oliveira, Niko" wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> Overall it looks great! I left some comments on the AIP document, but nothing
> that would block a +1
>
> Cheers,
> Niko
>
>
> From: Wei Lee
> Sent: Wednesda
+1 (binding)
Overall it looks great! I left some comments on the AIP document, but nothing
that would block a +1
Cheers,
Niko
From: Wei Lee
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:51:47 AM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
+1 (binding)
I have a very slight reservation from using the term "human", as I can
imagine that AI agents will be able to use this feature as well. Maybe
"manual" would do better?
In any case, not too critical atm - the concept of enabling is way more
important :)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025, 02:39 Vikr
+1 to this AIP, but have concerns on the term “Human” as well.
“manual”, what Shahar suggested, seems to be a great alternative!
Best,
Wei
> On Jun 4, 2025, at 5:33 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> +1. Yeah "Human" is not necessarily best name so we might want to change
> the name but overall it's g
+1. Yeah "Human" is not necessarily best name so we might want to change
the name but overall it's good to go
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:31 AM Igor Kholopov
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Overall looks good, would be great to also figure out early if it is also
> worth adding an API/UI for getting
+1 (non-binding)
Overall looks good, would be great to also figure out early if it is also
worth adding an API/UI for getting the information about all pending
approvals that require your attention.
I'd also be hesitant with "Human" in the name, as it can be approved via
API, so people will be us
24 matches
Mail list logo
