+1 binding. Looks really good!

On 2025/06/04 16:45:24 "Oliveira, Niko" wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> 
> 
> 
> Overall it looks great! I left some comments on the AIP document, but nothing 
> that would block a +1
> 
> Cheers,
> Niko
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:51:47 AM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
> links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the 
> content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe. Ne 
> cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez pas 
> confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que le 
> contenu ne présente aucun risque.
> 
> 
> 
> +1 to this AIP, but have concerns on the term “Human” as well.
> “manual”, what Shahar suggested, seems to be a great alternative!
> 
> Best,
> Wei
> 
> > On Jun 4, 2025, at 5:33 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1. Yeah "Human" is not necessarily best name so we might want to change
> > the name but overall it's good to go
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:31 AM Igor Kholopov <ikholo...@google.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> Overall looks good, would be great to also figure out early if it is also
> >> worth adding an API/UI for getting the information about all pending
> >> approvals that require your attention.
> >>
> >> I'd also be hesitant with "Human" in the name, as it can be approved via
> >> API, so people will be using it for automation without actual humans
> >> involved.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Igor
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 9:47 AM Shahar Epstein <sha...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> I have a very slight reservation from using the term "human", as I can
> >>> imagine that AI agents will be able to use this feature as well. Maybe
> >>> "manual" would do better?
> >>> In any case, not too critical atm - the concept of enabling is way more
> >>> important :)
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025, 02:39 Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> Jens and I would like to call a vote on this AIP
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-90+Human+in+the+loop
> >>>>
> >>>> The previous discussion thread was  https://lists.apache.org/thread/
> >>>> oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t
> >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t>
> >>>>
> >>>> Based on the prior discussions, we have added more details in the AIP
> >>>> document itself.
> >>>> Thank you to everyone who commented on the AIP. We have answered the
> >>>> comments to the best of our ability at this time, but also left them
> >>> open,
> >>>> so others can see the discussion.
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will run for ~5 days and last till next Monday, the 9th of
> >> June
> >>>> 2025 23:30 UTC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and
> >> Committer's
> >>>> votes are considered binding.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since Jens and I are co-authoring this, please consider this our +2 :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Vikram
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> Vikram Koka
> >>>> Chief Strategy Officer
> >>>> Email: vik...@astronomer.io
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org

Reply via email to