+1 binding. Left some comments on the AIP, no major concerns, just some thoughts.
I am not a huge fan of using "human" as discussed above, so maybe having a set of "interactive" operators makes sense? Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:48 AM Rahul Vats <rah.sharm...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 binding > > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 11:26, Phani Kumar <phani.ku...@astronomer.io > .invalid> > wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy <kalyan.be...@live.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 binding. > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com> > > > Sent: 05 June 2025 00:53 > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org <dev@airflow.apache.org> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop > > > > > > +1 non binding from me as well > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Aritra Basu > > > > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:19 am Ankit Chaurasia, <sunank...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 non-binding. > > > > > > > > *Ankit Chaurasia* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:51 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 binding > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 23:07, Vincent Beck <vincb...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 binding. Looks really good! > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2025/06/04 16:45:24 "Oliveira, Niko" wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Overall it looks great! I left some comments on the AIP > document, > > > but > > > > > > nothing that would block a +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Niko > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > From: Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:51:47 AM > > > > > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the > organization. > > Do > > > > not > > > > > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender > > and > > > > > know > > > > > > the content is safe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un > expéditeur > > > > > > externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce > jointe > > si > > > > > vous > > > > > > ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous > > n’êtes > > > > pas > > > > > > certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 to this AIP, but have concerns on the term “Human” as well. > > > > > > > “manual”, what Shahar suggested, seems to be a great > alternative! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > Wei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 4, 2025, at 5:33 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1. Yeah "Human" is not necessarily best name so we might > want > > to > > > > > > change > > > > > > > > the name but overall it's good to go > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:31 AM Igor Kholopov > > > > > > <ikholo...@google.com.invalid> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Overall looks good, would be great to also figure out early > if > > > it > > > > is > > > > > > also > > > > > > > >> worth adding an API/UI for getting the information about all > > > > pending > > > > > > > >> approvals that require your attention. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> I'd also be hesitant with "Human" in the name, as it can be > > > > approved > > > > > > via > > > > > > > >> API, so people will be using it for automation without > actual > > > > humans > > > > > > > >> involved. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Best regards, > > > > > > > >> Igor > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 9:47 AM Shahar Epstein < > > > sha...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> +1 (binding) > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> I have a very slight reservation from using the term > "human", > > > as > > > > I > > > > > > can > > > > > > > >>> imagine that AI agents will be able to use this feature as > > > well. > > > > > > Maybe > > > > > > > >>> "manual" would do better? > > > > > > > >>> In any case, not too critical atm - the concept of enabling > > is > > > > way > > > > > > more > > > > > > > >>> important :) > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025, 02:39 Vikram Koka > > > > > <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>> Hi everyone, > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Jens and I would like to call a vote on this AIP > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-90+Human+in+the+loop > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> The previous discussion thread was > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ > > > > > > > >>>> oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t > > > > > > > >>>> < > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Based on the prior discussions, we have added more details > > in > > > > the > > > > > > AIP > > > > > > > >>>> document itself. > > > > > > > >>>> Thank you to everyone who commented on the AIP. We have > > > answered > > > > > the > > > > > > > >>>> comments to the best of our ability at this time, but also > > > left > > > > > them > > > > > > > >>> open, > > > > > > > >>>> so others can see the discussion. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will run for ~5 days and last till next Monday, > the > > > 9th > > > > > of > > > > > > > >> June > > > > > > > >>>> 2025 23:30 UTC. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members > > and > > > > > > > >> Committer's > > > > > > > >>>> votes are considered binding. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Since Jens and I are co-authoring this, please consider > this > > > our > > > > > +2 > > > > > > :) > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Best regards, > > > > > > > >>>> Vikram > > > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Vikram Koka > > > > > > > >>>> Chief Strategy Officer > > > > > > > >>>> Email: vik...@astronomer.io > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
