Agreed, I think this could be in the standard package too. > On 9 Jun 2025, at 20:58, Bas Harenslak <b...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote: > > +1 > > With one remark: this feels so “generic” to me that I don’t see why it > necessitates a separate package. Why not include it in the standard provider? > > Bas > >> On 9 Jun 2025, at 19:18, Shubham Raj <shubhamraj....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 binding >> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 7:17 AM Vishnu Chilukoori <vish.chiluko...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 non-binding >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regard, >>> Vishnu Chilukoori >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 9:20 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu < >>> gopidesupa...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 binding.. >>>> >>>> Pavan >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025, 21:08 Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (with it being “human-in-the-loop” still.) >>>>> >>>>> -ash >>>>> >>>>>> On 5 Jun 2025, at 11:34, Buğra Öztürk <ozturkbugr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 binding, looks exciting >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:29 Tamara Fingerlin, >>>>>> <tamara.finger...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 non-binding. Very excited about this! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:37 AM 邱冠銘 <b10101...@ntu.edu.tw> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for non-binding. I think HITL makes sense to me since it’s a >>>> common >>>>>>>> word used in many place like >>>>>>>> https://cloud.google.com/discover/human-in-the-loop. But “manual” >>>>>>>> proposed by Shahar is also a good choice in my opinion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Guan-Ming >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2025/06/05 08:10:43 Ephraim Anierobi wrote: >>>>>>>>> +1 binding >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 07:52, Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 binding. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Left some comments on the AIP, no major concerns, just some >>>> thoughts. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am not a huge fan of using "human" as discussed above, so maybe >>>>>>>> having a >>>>>>>>>> set of "interactive" operators makes sense? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Amogh Desai >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:48 AM Rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Rahul Vats >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 11:26, Phani Kumar < >>>>>>> phani.ku...@astronomer.io >>>>>>>>>>> .invalid> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy <ka...@live.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding. >>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Aritra Basu <ar...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 05 June 2025 00:53 >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org <de...@airflow.apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 non binding from me as well >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Aritra Basu >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:19 am Ankit Chaurasia, < >>> su...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 non-binding. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Ankit Chaurasia* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:51 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 23:07, Vincent Beck < >>>>>>> vi...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding. Looks really good! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025/06/04 16:45:24 "Oliveira, Niko" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall it looks great! I left some comments on the AIP >>>>>>>>>>> document, >>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing that would block a +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Niko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:51:47 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the >>>>>>>>>>> organization. >>>>>>>>>>>> Do >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> sender >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the content is safe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un >>>>>>>>>>> expéditeur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune >>>>>>> pièce >>>>>>>>>>> jointe >>>>>>>>>>>> si >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vous >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si >>>>>>>> vous >>>>>>>>>>>> n’êtes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to this AIP, but have concerns on the term “Human” >>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “manual”, what Shahar suggested, seems to be a great >>>>>>>>>>> alternative! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wei >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2025, at 5:33 PM, Jarek Potiuk < >>>>>>>> ja...@potiuk.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1. Yeah "Human" is not necessarily best name so we >>>>>>>> might >>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the name but overall it's good to go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:31 AM Igor Kholopov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ik...@google.com.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall looks good, would be great to also figure >>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>> early >>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth adding an API/UI for getting the information >>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approvals that require your attention. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd also be hesitant with "Human" in the name, as it >>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API, so people will be using it for automation >>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>>>> actual >>>>>>>>>>>>>> humans >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> involved. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 9:47 AM Shahar Epstein < >>>>>>>>>>>>> sha...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a very slight reservation from using the >>>>>>> term >>>>>>>>>>> "human", >>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imagine that AI agents will be able to use this >>>>>>>> feature >>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "manual" would do better? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, not too critical atm - the concept of >>>>>>>>>> enabling >>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025, 02:39 Vikram Koka >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jens and I would like to call a vote on this AIP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-90+Human+in+the+loop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The previous discussion thread was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the prior discussions, we have added more >>>>>>>>>> details >>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document itself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you to everyone who commented on the AIP. We >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>> answered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments to the best of our ability at this time, >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>> also >>>>>>>>>>>>> left >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so others can see the discussion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will run for ~5 days and last till next >>>>>>>> Monday, >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> 9th >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> June >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025 23:30 UTC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC >>>>>>>>>> members >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes are considered binding. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since Jens and I are co-authoring this, please >>>>>>>> consider >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vikram >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vikram Koka >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chief Strategy Officer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: vik...@astronomer.io >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>>>> dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>>> dev-h...@airflow.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>>> dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>>> dev-h...@airflow.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
