+1

With one remark: this feels so “generic” to me that I don’t see why it 
necessitates a separate package. Why not include it in the standard provider?

Bas

> On 9 Jun 2025, at 19:18, Shubham Raj <shubhamraj....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 binding
> 
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 7:17 AM Vishnu Chilukoori <vish.chiluko...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 non-binding
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Regard,
>> Vishnu Chilukoori
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 9:20 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu <
>> gopidesupa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 binding..
>>> 
>>> Pavan
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025, 21:08 Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 (with it being “human-in-the-loop” still.)
>>>> 
>>>> -ash
>>>> 
>>>>> On 5 Jun 2025, at 11:34, Buğra Öztürk <ozturkbugr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1 binding, looks exciting
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:29 Tamara Fingerlin,
>>>>> <tamara.finger...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 non-binding. Very excited about this!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:37 AM 邱冠銘 <b10101...@ntu.edu.tw> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 for non-binding. I think HITL makes sense to me since it’s a
>>> common
>>>>>>> word used in many place like
>>>>>>> https://cloud.google.com/discover/human-in-the-loop. But “manual”
>>>>>>> proposed by Shahar is also a good choice in my opinion.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Guan-Ming
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2025/06/05 08:10:43 Ephraim Anierobi wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 07:52, Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> +1 binding.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Left some comments on the AIP, no major concerns, just some
>>> thoughts.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I am not a huge fan of using "human" as discussed above, so maybe
>>>>>>> having a
>>>>>>>>> set of "interactive" operators makes sense?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Amogh Desai
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:48 AM Rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Rahul Vats
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 11:26, Phani Kumar <
>>>>>> phani.ku...@astronomer.io
>>>>>>>>>> .invalid>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy <ka...@live.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Aritra Basu <ar...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 05 June 2025 00:53
>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org <de...@airflow.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 non binding from me as well
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Aritra Basu
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:19 am Ankit Chaurasia, <
>> su...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 non-binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Ankit Chaurasia*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:51 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 23:07, Vincent Beck <
>>>>>> vi...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding. Looks really good!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025/06/04 16:45:24 "Oliveira, Niko" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall it looks great! I left some comments on the AIP
>>>>>>>>>> document,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing that would block a +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Niko
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:51:47 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the
>>>>>>>>>> organization.
>>>>>>>>>>> Do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> sender
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the content is safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un
>>>>>>>>>> expéditeur
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune
>>>>>> pièce
>>>>>>>>>> jointe
>>>>>>>>>>> si
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si
>>>>>>> vous
>>>>>>>>>>> n’êtes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to this AIP, but have concerns on the term “Human”
>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “manual”, what Shahar suggested, seems to be a great
>>>>>>>>>> alternative!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wei
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2025, at 5:33 PM, Jarek Potiuk <
>>>>>>> ja...@potiuk.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1. Yeah "Human" is not necessarily best name so we
>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the name but overall it's good to go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:31 AM Igor Kholopov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ik...@google.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall looks good, would be great to also figure
>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>> early
>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth adding an API/UI for getting the information
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pending
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approvals that require your attention.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd also be hesitant with "Human" in the name, as it
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API, so people will be using it for automation
>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>> actual
>>>>>>>>>>>>> humans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> involved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 9:47 AM Shahar Epstein <
>>>>>>>>>>>> sha...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a very slight reservation from using the
>>>>>> term
>>>>>>>>>> "human",
>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imagine that AI agents will be able to use this
>>>>>>> feature
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "manual" would do better?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, not too critical atm - the concept of
>>>>>>>>> enabling
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025, 02:39 Vikram Koka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jens and I would like to call a vote on this AIP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-90+Human+in+the+loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The previous discussion thread was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the prior discussions, we have added more
>>>>>>>>> details
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you to everyone who commented on the AIP. We
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>> answered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments to the best of our ability at this time,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>> left
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so others can see the discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will run for ~5 days and last till next
>>>>>>> Monday,
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> 9th
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025 23:30 UTC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC
>>>>>>>>> members
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes are considered binding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since Jens and I are co-authoring this, please
>>>>>>> consider
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vikram
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vikram Koka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chief Strategy Officer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: vik...@astronomer.io
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>> dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>> dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>> dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>> dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org

Reply via email to