+1 non-binding
-- Regard, Vishnu Chilukoori On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 9:20 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu <gopidesupa...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 binding.. > > Pavan > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2025, 21:08 Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 (with it being “human-in-the-loop” still.) > > > > -ash > > > > > On 5 Jun 2025, at 11:34, Buğra Öztürk <ozturkbugr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > +1 binding, looks exciting > > > > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:29 Tamara Fingerlin, > > > <tamara.finger...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 non-binding. Very excited about this! > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:37 AM 邱冠銘 <b10101...@ntu.edu.tw> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 for non-binding. I think HITL makes sense to me since it’s a > common > > >>> word used in many place like > > >>> https://cloud.google.com/discover/human-in-the-loop. But “manual” > > >>> proposed by Shahar is also a good choice in my opinion. > > >>> > > >>> Best, > > >>> Guan-Ming > > >>> > > >>> On 2025/06/05 08:10:43 Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > > >>>> +1 binding > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 07:52, Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> +1 binding. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Left some comments on the AIP, no major concerns, just some > thoughts. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I am not a huge fan of using "human" as discussed above, so maybe > > >>> having a > > >>>>> set of "interactive" operators makes sense? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks & Regards, > > >>>>> Amogh Desai > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:48 AM Rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 binding > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>> Rahul Vats > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 11:26, Phani Kumar < > > >> phani.ku...@astronomer.io > > >>>>>> .invalid> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 binding > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy <ka...@live.com> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 binding. > > >>>>>>>> ________________________________ > > >>>>>>>> From: Aritra Basu <ar...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>> Sent: 05 June 2025 00:53 > > >>>>>>>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org <de...@airflow.apache.org> > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 non binding from me as well > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>> Aritra Basu > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 12:19 am Ankit Chaurasia, <su...@gmail.com > > >>> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 non-binding. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> *Ankit Chaurasia* > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:51 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 binding > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 23:07, Vincent Beck < > > >> vi...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding. Looks really good! > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025/06/04 16:45:24 "Oliveira, Niko" wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Overall it looks great! I left some comments on the AIP > > >>>>>> document, > > >>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>> nothing that would block a +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Niko > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:51:47 AM > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the > > >>>>>> organization. > > >>>>>>> Do > > >>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm > > >> the > > >>>>> sender > > >>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>> know > > >>>>>>>>>>> the content is safe. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un > > >>>>>> expéditeur > > >>>>>>>>>>> externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune > > >> pièce > > >>>>>> jointe > > >>>>>>> si > > >>>>>>>>>> vous > > >>>>>>>>>>> ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si > > >>> vous > > >>>>>>> n’êtes > > >>>>>>>>> pas > > >>>>>>>>>>> certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to this AIP, but have concerns on the term “Human” > > >> as > > >>>>> well. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> “manual”, what Shahar suggested, seems to be a great > > >>>>>> alternative! > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Wei > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2025, at 5:33 PM, Jarek Potiuk < > > >>> ja...@potiuk.com > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1. Yeah "Human" is not necessarily best name so we > > >>> might > > >>>>>> want > > >>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>> change > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the name but overall it's good to go > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:31 AM Igor Kholopov > > >>>>>>>>>>> <ik...@google.com.invalid> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall looks good, would be great to also figure > > >> out > > >>>>> early > > >>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>> also > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth adding an API/UI for getting the information > > >>> about > > >>>>> all > > >>>>>>>>> pending > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> approvals that require your attention. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd also be hesitant with "Human" in the name, as it > > >>> can > > >>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>> approved > > >>>>>>>>>>> via > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> API, so people will be using it for automation > > >> without > > >>>>>> actual > > >>>>>>>>> humans > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> involved. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 9:47 AM Shahar Epstein < > > >>>>>>>> sha...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a very slight reservation from using the > > >> term > > >>>>>> "human", > > >>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>> can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imagine that AI agents will be able to use this > > >>> feature > > >>>>> as > > >>>>>>>> well. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "manual" would do better? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, not too critical atm - the concept of > > >>>>> enabling > > >>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>> way > > >>>>>>>>>>> more > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025, 02:39 Vikram Koka > > >>>>>>>>>> <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jens and I would like to call a vote on this AIP > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-90+Human+in+the+loop > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The previous discussion thread was > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxr3rm7mlvyxoyx0qfcbmlwggof1xb5t > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the prior discussions, we have added more > > >>>>> details > > >>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>> AIP > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document itself. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you to everyone who commented on the AIP. We > > >>> have > > >>>>>>>> answered > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments to the best of our ability at this time, > > >>> but > > >>>>> also > > >>>>>>>> left > > >>>>>>>>>> them > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so others can see the discussion. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will run for ~5 days and last till next > > >>> Monday, > > >>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>> 9th > > >>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> June > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2025 23:30 UTC. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC > > >>>>> members > > >>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer's > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes are considered binding. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since Jens and I are co-authoring this, please > > >>> consider > > >>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>> our > > >>>>>>>>>> +2 > > >>>>>>>>>>> :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vikram > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vikram Koka > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chief Strategy Officer > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: vik...@astronomer.io > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >>> dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > >>> dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > >>> dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> Sent from my iPhone > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > >
