Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Michel Verdier
On 2024-07-20, hlyg wrote: > i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows no doubt :) > according to some statistics linux has only 4% desktop market, 73% for MS, 15% > for MacOS Linux is not on the market. I buy M$ but download debian. How can you say how many people is using debian? Once u

Re: Running 32-bit static exeutable on 64-bit Debian

2024-07-20 Thread David
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 at 06:44, Van Snyder wrote: > On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 05:54 +, David wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 at 04:56, Van Snyder wrote: > > > I'm trying to run a 32-bit static executable on 64-bit Debian 12.5 > > > "bookworm." > > > > > > When I launch it, I get > > > > > > ./Linu

Re: Running 32-bit static exeutable on 64-bit Debian

2024-07-20 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Van Snyder wrote: > And there's still the mystery why a statically-linked executable wants to > load a shared object library. I doubt that it is possible to make a purely statical binary with no references to .any so libraries. (If it were generally possible, why then exist Flatpack and Snap

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread hlyg
Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who develop more apps, which attract more users. e.g. many vpn providers support Windows and android, not linux. linux can get distributed by word-of-mouth if it i

Re: Running 32-bit static exeutable on 64-bit Debian

2024-07-20 Thread Van Snyder
On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 09:31 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Van Snyder wrote: > > And there's still the mystery why a statically-linked executable > > wants to > > load a shared object library. > > I doubt that it is possible to make a purely statical binary with no > references to .any so

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Nicolas George
hlyg (12024-07-20): > Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable > recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who > develop more apps, The programmers who are attracted by market share are not necessarily the ones who are interested in developing qualit

Re: Running 32-bit static exeutable on 64-bit Debian

2024-07-20 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Van Snyder wrote: > Am I losing my mind? Since this could mean a fatal end to the endeavor to run your program we should postpone this hypothesis until nearly everything else is outruled. > At first I had done "file LinuxSusser". It reported "Statically linked." > Just to be sure, I did the

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 20 Jul 2024 10:28 +0200, from geo...@nsup.org (Nicolas George): >> Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable >> recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who >> develop more apps, > > The programmers who are attracted by market share are not necess

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread jeremy ardley
On 20/7/24 16:56, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 20 Jul 2024 10:28 +0200, fromgeo...@nsup.org (Nicolas George): Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who develop more apps, The programmers who are attra

Re: w4sp-lab

2024-07-20 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
[Enviado en directo tambien porque trata de Gmail - also sent direct because of Gmail] On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 02:29:15AM +0200, Aleix Piulachs wrote: > installing w4sp-lab and wireshark there are many errors and I can't install > it.. Querido Aleix, Que estas haciendo aqui? Has escrito muchas v

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread hlyg
On 7/20/24 15:02, Michel Verdier wrote: Linux is not on the market. I buy M$ but download debian. How can you say how many people is using debian? Once upon a time there was a linuxcounter... Thank tomas, Verdier and George! statistics about market share might come from web servers and game

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread George at Clug
On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 13:54 hlyg wrote: > crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens The CrowdStrike issue was not a Windows issue, it was a CrowdStrike issue. The problem did not affect our Windows computers as we have not installed CrowdStrike software. I think the

Re: Re[2]: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread George at Clug
Well said, Michael. On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 20:19 Michael Grant wrote: > My opinions only... > > 1) MS Office (Word/Excel/PPT/etc) has never been available for > Unix/Gnu-Linux. Word and Excel have long been 2 apps users require. > Not OpenOffice. While OpenOffice is quite featureful, it

why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread DdB
Am 20.07.2024 um 05:54 schrieb hlyg: > why free OS hasn't gained more share even after 30 years of development? I want to kickoff by reminding, that WHY questions are rarely useful, it is what small kidz are asking, when they want to learn, how to argue with adults. ;-) But approaching the topic

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 20 Jul 2024 17:25 +0800, from jeremy.ard...@gmail.com (jeremy ardley): >> A lot of paid-for programmer time isn't necessarily for what the >> individual programmer_wants_ to do. If one's employer dictates that >> their products should support Mac OS and Windows, for example, then >> there's usu

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 20 Jul 2024 16:57 +0800, from hlyg2...@outlook.com (hlyg): > statistics about market share might come from web servers and game servers, > they know how many users use linux and Windows. No. They at most can know what platform user agents report. Which isn't necessarily the same thing at all.

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Michel Verdier
On 2024-07-20, Michael Grant wrote: > OpenOffice is quite featureful, it is not 100% bug for bug compatible with > real MS Office products. I failed to read an old version word file on a newer word. And succeed with libreoffice. So yes it's not 100% bug compatible :) > choices. There is no clea

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Michel Verdier
On 2024-07-20, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 20 Jul 2024 16:57 +0800, from hlyg2...@outlook.com (hlyg): >> statistics about market share might come from web servers and game servers, >> they know how many users use linux and Windows. > > No. They at most can know what platform user agents report.

Re: Running 32-bit static exeutable on 64-bit Debian

2024-07-20 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 5:50 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Van Snyder wrote: > > And there's still the mystery why a statically-linked executable wants to > > load a shared object library. > > I doubt that it is possible to make a purely statical binary with no > references to .any so libraries. >

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Jeff Pang
My reason to keep windows is that I can’t play Starcraft under Linux. -- Jeff Pang jeffp...@aol.com

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread jeremy ardley
On 20/7/24 18:35, George at Clug wrote: On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 13:54 hlyg wrote: > crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens The CrowdStrike issue was not a Windows issue, it was a CrowdStrike issue. The problem did not affect our Windows computers as we have no

Re: Running 32-bit static exeutable on 64-bit Debian

2024-07-20 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 01:15:22 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > Van Snyder wrote: > > > And there's still the mystery why a statically-linked executable > > > wants to > > > load a shared object library. https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/manpages-dev/dlopen.3.en.html > Am I losing my mind? > >

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Larry Martell
I’ve never owned a machine running windows in my life.

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Hans
Hello, well, the thing is: Do we really want to go to more market share? Let's imagine, Debian becomes market relevant, what will happen? Sure, more developers get paid, what is very nice. But not all developers will. Many good developers will not be paid and when the market will rule things,

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread gene heskett
On 7/20/24 04:28, Nicolas George wrote: hlyg (12024-07-20): Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who develop more apps, The programmers who are attracted by market share are not necessarily the ones w

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread George at Clug
On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 23:59 Hans wrote: > Hello, > > well, the thing is: Do we really want to go to more market share? > > Let's imagine, Debian becomes market relevant, what will happen? Sure, more > developers get paid, what is very nice. But not all developers will. > > Many good dev

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Nicolas George
gene heskett (12024-07-20): > > If they were, you'd have support for software-defined radio signal > > processing in FFmpeg, for example. > Which the current rules for such does not allow, by FCC edicts, only sealed > FCC approved blobs are allowed to play in the rf field. > So don't blame the code

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread gene heskett
On 7/20/24 09:58, Larry Martell wrote: I’ve never owned a machine running windows in my life. I've owned one. I needed a lappy I could use with a gps for roadmap, had the then new XP on it, cleared the disk a week later and put mandrake on it because XP had no drivers that could run the broadco

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Hans
Which is not quite correct. As a hamradio (I am one), you are allowed to develop your very owh rf-devices. Transceivers, measure equipment, whatever you like. Many things, we are using today in consumer devices are first developed by radio amateurs (example shorthand "packet radio", which is da

Re: Running 32-bit static exeutable on 64-bit Debian

2024-07-20 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Then it's almost certainly using dlopen() to load this shared library. dlopen(3) explains the missing gtk modules which (i assume) are not reported by ldd. But it does not explain why "file" and ldd now report something different than they reported a while ago. Have a

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 12:16 AM wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 02:45:37PM +1000, David wrote: > > On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 11:54 +0800, hlyg wrote: > > [...] > > > > why free OS hasn't gained more share even after 30 years of > > > development? > > > > Because people don't have it hammered into the

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Russell L. Harris
The same reasons the standard typewriter keyboard is QWERTY rather than Dvorak: = The precedent set by the first to market is powerful. = The influence of advertising upon a populace lacking in discernment and addicted to novelty is deadly. Add to that extortion and bribes and a compromised leg

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Joe
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:59:14 +0200 Hans wrote: > Hello, > > well, the thing is: Do we really want to go to more market share? > > Let's imagine, Debian becomes market relevant, what will happen? > Sure, more developers get paid, what is very nice. But not all > developers will. > > Many good d

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread gene heskett
On 7/20/24 09:59, Hans wrote: Hello, well, the thing is: Do we really want to go to more market share? Let's imagine, Debian becomes market relevant, what will happen? Sure, more developers get paid, what is very nice. But not all developers will. Many good developers will not be paid and when

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Hans
> You missed one: Linux is virtually a virus-free environment, and a > large user base would mean many more people running as root, and it > would become worth the time of malware writers to target Linux. Linux > would become as virus-ridden as Windows. > > It would also become a target for data h

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 11:54:06AM +0800, hlyg wrote: > crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens > > it is evident that many people around still use Windows > > i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows For this specific issue, if Linux were used at the same

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Jeff Pang
I would think linux is better as server OS due to reasons of security, performance and Operability etc. Once aol mail was running on windows. But now aol is merged into yahoo mail which was originally run on freebsd but now linux mostly. And the initial hotmail was running on freebsd too IIRC

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread debian-user
Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 11:54:06AM +0800, hlyg wrote: > > crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens > > > > it is evident that many people around still use Windows > > > > i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows > > For this specif

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 09:44:52PM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > It seems clear to me that what's needed is a change in the law. At the > moment here in the UK we have national news services explaining that > airline passengers won't be able to get compensation because the > 'even

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Nicolas George
Andy Smith (12024-07-20): > And yes here in the UK where we allowed the Post Office to pay > billions to Fujitsu to develop the Horizon IT system that > incorrectly accused hundreds of postmasters of fraud, resulting in > criminal prosecutions and at least one case of suicide. That was not a bug,

pam and pam-cap don't play along

2024-07-20 Thread daggs
Greetings, I have bookworm installation where I want to allow a group of users to run a specific binary that needs to execute a ioctl which is not possible for normal users. in comes pam+libcap. so I've installed libcap, updated /etc/security/capability.conf with this line: cap_net_admin @igo

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread hlyg
Thank Clug and all that reply ! On 7/20/24 18:36, George at Clug wrote: Do you think Windows is not reliable? Why is that? Windows used to crash often, i rarely use it now, they say it's more stable these day Do you use Linux yourself? surely i use as this is debian user list Have you tried

CrowdStrike and drivers (was Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?)

2024-07-20 Thread The Wanderer
On 2024-07-20 at 09:19, jeremy ardley wrote: > On 20/7/24 18:35, George at Clug wrote: > >> On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 13:54 hlyg wrote: >> >>> crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue >>> screens >> >> The CrowdStrike issue was not a Windows issue, it was a CrowdStrike >> iss

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 2:09 PM Joe wrote: > > You missed one: Linux is virtually a virus-free environment, and a > large user base would mean many more people running as root, and it > would become worth the time of malware writers to target Linux. Linux > would become as virus-ridden as Windows.

CrowdStrike and drivers (was Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?)

2024-07-20 Thread George at Clug
On Sunday, 21-07-2024 at 08:38 The Wanderer wrote: > On 2024-07-20 at 09:19, jeremy ardley wrote: > > > On 20/7/24 18:35, George at Clug wrote: > > > >> On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 13:54 hlyg wrote: > >> > >>> crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue > >>> screens > >> > >>

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread gene heskett
On 7/20/24 16:45, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: Andy Smith wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 11:54:06AM +0800, hlyg wrote: crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens it is evident that many people around still use Windows i wonder if linux is more reliable than

Re: CrowdStrike and drivers (was Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?)

2024-07-20 Thread jeremy ardley
On 21/7/24 06:38, The Wanderer wrote: The first would be poor institutional practice; the others would be potentially-questionable software design, although it's hard to know without seeing the internal architecture of the software in question and understanding*why* it's designed that way. I

Re: Running 32-bit static exeutable on 64-bit Debian

2024-07-20 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 8:57 AM Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 01:15:22 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > > Van Snyder wrote: > > > > And there's still the mystery why a statically-linked executable > > > > wants to > > > > load a shared object library. > > https://manpages.debian.org/bo

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread jeremy ardley
On 21/7/24 07:28, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: Again lacking data center experience? Every server in your data center that is outward-facing will be contacted by intruders on its open ports. That includes your Debian servers. If your apache server or application server running on Debian is vulne

Re: pam and pam-cap don't play along

2024-07-20 Thread George at Clug
On Sunday, 21-07-2024 at 07:57 daggs wrote: > Greetings, > > I have bookworm installation where I want to allow a group of users to run a specific binary that needs to execute a ioctl which is not possible for normal users. > in comes pam+libcap. > so I've installed libcap, updated /etc/security/c

Re: CrowdStrike and drivers (was Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?)

2024-07-20 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 9:46 PM The Wanderer wrote: > > On 2024-07-20 at 09:19, jeremy ardley wrote: > > > On 20/7/24 18:35, George at Clug wrote: > > [...] > > The problem was not CrowdStrike as such. It happens in the best of > > operations. > > > > The problem is the Windows Systems Administrat

Re: CrowdStrike and drivers (was Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?)

2024-07-20 Thread Bret Busby
On 21/7/24 10:07, Jeffrey Walton wrote: All this points to an incompetent board. If someone's head is going to be taken (figuratively), then it should start with the CEO and other executives. Yes. But, the people who should be sacked, with loss of benefits, are the board members and the CE

Re: CrowdStrike and drivers (was Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?)

2024-07-20 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 10:28:28AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > Crowdstrike did not strike at Linux or BSD UNIX systems - only MS Windows > systems. Except that time just a few months ago when it *did* happen to Crowdstrike+Linux? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41005936 Nothing in t

Re: pam and pam-cap don't play along

2024-07-20 Thread Kamil Jońca
daggs writes: > Greetings, > > I have bookworm installation where I want to allow a group of users to run a > specific binary that needs to execute a ioctl which is not possible for > normal users. > in comes pam+libcap. > so I've installed libcap, updated /etc/security/capability.conf with thi

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread tomas
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 03:27:17PM -0400, gene heskett wrote: [...] > And even you Hans, leave out the major, all encompassing, reason for the > lack of market share, which is that most business that have a computerized > system to run things also value what their MBA says. And since there is no

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?

2024-07-20 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:46:24AM +0800, jeremy ardley wrote: > A plug for SELinux. It's been around for a long time. It was invented by the > NSA for use by Government agencies but they kindly open sourced it and it's > available on many Distros including Debian. > > SELinux is a real pain to g

Re: CrowdStrike and drivers (was Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?)

2024-07-20 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:17:54AM +0800, jeremy ardley wrote: > The CrowdStrike outage emulated the very thing it is alleged to protect > against - a zero day exploit. It was also a demonstration of a huge vulnerability. If $EvilActor were to get an agent employed at CrowdStrike/whoever then the

Re: CrowdStrike and drivers (was Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?)

2024-07-20 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 2:15 AM Andy Smith wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 10:28:28AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > > Crowdstrike did not strike at Linux or BSD UNIX systems - only MS Windows > > systems. > > Except that time just a few months ago when it *did* happen to > Crowdstrike+Linux? > >

sendmail without DNS

2024-07-20 Thread Adam Weremczuk
This is in a way a continuation of my recently "purely local DNS" thread. To recap: my objective is to send emails to a single domain with both DNS and any other email traffic being disabled. A simple working solution that I've found for Postfix is: /etc/hosts 1.2.3.4example.com /etc/pos