debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
>Franco Martelli wrote:
>> On 25/07/24 at 15:07, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> > Yeah... I have to use a Private window (Firefox) or an Incognito
>> > window (Chrome) to duplicate this. If I'm using my regular browser
>> > sessions where I'm logged in to the wiki, I do
Franco Martelli wrote:
> On 25/07/24 at 15:07, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Yeah... I have to use a Private window (Firefox) or an Incognito
> > window (Chrome) to duplicate this. If I'm using my regular browser
> > sessions where I'm logged in to the wiki, I don't get that result.
> >
>
> When i
On 25/07/24 at 15:07, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Yeah... I have to use a Private window (Firefox) or an Incognito window
(Chrome) to duplicate this. If I'm using my regular browser sessions
where I'm logged in to the wiki, I don't get that result.
When in editing mode by clicking "Preview" button i
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 20:02:11 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 25/07/2024 19:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 18:54:38 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> > > https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables?action=recall&rev=32
> [...]
> > I can't quite guess what "text has no left margin
On 25/07/2024 19:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 18:54:38 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables?action=recall&rev=32
[...]
I can't quite guess what "text has no left margin" means here.
Firefox-115, see the attachment. Notice that "General",
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 18:54:38 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> A space before " <>" combined with 2 empty lines after
> cause extra "" closing before following text. So
> most of article text has no left margin.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/WikiSandBox?action=recall&rev=144
> https://wiki.debian.org
On 25/07/2024 10:42, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 09:50:43 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables?action=raw&rev=33
has one empty line after "<>" while rev=22 has 2 empty
lines and it may be more significant than a space before "<<".
I assume y
on that team will have to be the one to fix it.
I feel sympathy for anyone who's trying to translate a wiki page that
keeps changing. I can only imagine how much effort that must be.
I suspect that part of the reason the Debian wiki doesn't get updated as
often as it probably should is because people don't want to create extra
work for the translators.
On 25/07/2024 02:05, Franco Martelli wrote:
I'm using firefox-esr version: 115.13.0esr-1~deb12u1
Here I see the TOC not indented (no space before << tag):
https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables?action=raw
Here instead I see the TOC indented (a space before << tag):
https://wiki.debian.org
On 24/07/24 at 20:15, Greg Wooledge wrote:
https://wiki.debian.org/Permissions?action=raw
here there's a space before the << tag and, as I said, clicking on the
"Preview" button when in edit mode, it didn't help.
Well, the table of contents is indented on that page as well.
It sounds like you'
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 20:08:08 +0200, Franco Martelli wrote:
> On 24/07/24 at 15:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > Could anybody tell me what I did wrong?
> > You had a leading space before the << tag. That caused the TOC to be
> > indented. I removed that.
>
> Oh, Thank you very much Greg, what
On 24/07/24 at 15:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Could anybody tell me what I did wrong?
You had a leading space before the << tag. That caused the TOC to be
indented. I removed that.
Oh, Thank you very much Greg, what confused me it was the page that I
took as reference:
https://wiki.debian.or
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 15:19:29 +0200, Franco Martelli wrote:
> https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables
>
> The trouble is that the page has lost indentation, the text begins on the
> left side of the page.
The only part that was indented was the table of contents itself. I
fixed that.
>
Hi,
I've added <> (the index of all paragraphs inside
the wiki page) directive to this wiki page:
https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables
The trouble is that the page has lost indentation, the text begins on
the left side of the page.
In addition when I'm in editing mode and I click the
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 05:02:22PM -0400, Oliver Wenston wrote:
> I purchased a vps to use as my vpn server, and found out that it was black
> listed from the https://wiki.debian.org/ website. I am currently using
> Bookworm, and would love to be able to visit the wiki with my vpn.
>
> Who should
Dear Debian mailing list,
I purchased a vps to use as my vpn server, and found out that it was black
listed from the https://wiki.debian.org/ website. I am currently using
Bookworm, and would love to be able to visit the wiki with my vpn.
Who should I contact next on a private channel to get my I
On 1/10/23 13:12, Dan Ritter wrote:
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
Hi all!
I've just read Debian's Wiki page about CPU Microcode and there are
mentioned Intel's and AMD's processors for AMD64 architecture.
What is the situation with processors from other architectures
(arm64/AArch64 for example)?
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've just read Debian's Wiki page about CPU Microcode and there are
> mentioned Intel's and AMD's processors for AMD64 architecture.
>
> What is the situation with processors from other architectures
> (arm64/AArch64 for example)?
>
> - do they have micro
Hi all!
I've just read Debian's Wiki page about CPU Microcode and there are
mentioned Intel's and AMD's processors for AMD64 architecture.
What is the situation with processors from other architectures
(arm64/AArch64 for example)?
- do they have microcode?
- can microcode be updated for t
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 22:03:16 +0100
Yvan Masson wrote:
> I made a few modifications based on your comments:
> https://wiki.debian.org/GRUB2?action=diff&rev2=28&rev1=27
>
> Hope it is clear now.
Much better, thank you.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https:/
Le 01/12/2022 à 18:14, Charles Curley a écrit :
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 16:07:53 +0100
Yvan Masson wrote:
I have just updated the GRUB2 page on the wiki to briefly explain how
GRUB2 should be configured in case of software RAID [1]. As I am not
an expert nor an English native, could someone have a
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 16:07:53 +0100
Yvan Masson wrote:
> I have just updated the GRUB2 page on the wiki to briefly explain how
> GRUB2 should be configured in case of software RAID [1]. As I am not
> an expert nor an English native, could someone have a look to check
> this?
Being a native Englis
Hi,
I have just updated the GRUB2 page on the wiki to briefly explain how
GRUB2 should be configured in case of software RAID [1]. As I am not an
expert nor an English native, could someone have a look to check this?
Thanks,
Yvan
1. https://wiki.debian.org/GRUB2?action=diff&rev2=27&rev1=26
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 09:54:48PM +0200, s...@hardwarepunk.de wrote:
> Hello alltogether,
>
> the Debian Wiki seems to be down, and I do not know where and how to
> send a bug report to. If I go to any side below
> https://wiki.debian.org/, I only get the following message:
Hello alltogether,
the Debian Wiki seems to be down, and I do not know where and how to
send a bug report to. If I go to any side below
https://wiki.debian.org/, I only get the following message:
Forbidden
You are not allowed to access this!
Greetings
Sven
On Ma, 12 mai 20, 10:24:51, l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 12 mai 2020 à 09:55 de riveravaldezm...@gmail.com:
>
> > not sure if this is the place for this, but I've found a little
> > confusing to find where to mention a debian-wiki issue...
> >
> I'
Hi,
12 mai 2020 à 09:55 de riveravaldezm...@gmail.com:
> not sure if this is the place for this, but I've found a little
> confusing to find where to mention a debian-wiki issue...
>
I'm not answering the "issue" part itself but here are two pointers regarding
h
Hi, not sure if this is the place for this, but I've found a little
confusing to find where to mention a debian-wiki issue...
The SystemVirtualization[1] wiki-page offers as first 'Debian
solution' VirtualBox[2], which is non-free and "not available in
Debian 10 and won'
On Sat 17/Aug/2019 04:13:28 +0200 Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> - https://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts
> - https://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/DependencyBasedBoot
>
> It would be great if someone experienced could take a look. Especially
> the last two pages could need more updating, since AFAIK i
.
Steffen
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:19 PM Roberto C. Sánchez
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:15:32PM +0200, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> >Hi,
> > is the "Debian Wiki" at [1]https://wiki.debian.org/ "official"? If
> so, I
> >hope her
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:15:32PM +0200, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>Hi,
>is the "Debian Wiki" at [1]https://wiki.debian.org/ "official"? If so, I
>hope here is the right place to ask. The wiki at e.g.
>[2]https://wiki.debian.org/LSB tells &q
Hi,
is the "Debian Wiki" at https://wiki.debian.org/ "official"? If so, I hope
here is the right place to ask. The wiki at e.g. https://wiki.debian.org/LSB
tells "Currently all major distributions comply with the LSB" and
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianLsb tells
Hi,
Curt wrote:
> I thought nobody said "should better not be used," but sticking that quoted
> phrase in a search engine produces over 12,000 hits.
12 thousand is not much. Popular germanisms get more. We are busy
spoilers of english language.
---
On 9/29/18, Dominic Knight wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 08:59 +, Curt wrote:
>> On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>> > This is not "unreliable" it is "clueless".
>> > Insofar Curt's proposal is technically more correct.
>> > But actually i see no improvement over my shorter statement.
>>
On 2018-09-29, Dominic Knight wrote:
>
> Maybe an implicit threat of resulting danger needs to be implied?
Implicit threats? Yeah, man. Like:
"Got money and DVD/BD media to burn? Then burn 'em up with wodim*, the
geeky masochist's premier choice for an unspecifiable subset of his
burning needs.
On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 08:59 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > This is not "unreliable" it is "clueless".
> > Insofar Curt's proposal is technically more correct.
> > But actually i see no improvement over my shorter statement.
> > (Maybe it's better english, but it's no
On 9/29/18 10:59 AM, Curt wrote:
> Doubts now linger in my mind as to whether I haven't used up a lot of
> electrons
> for nothing.
>
> There's so many of them, though, I guess frugality isn't an issue (unless
> Wheeler was right, and I've sent the one zipping all over the place).
That's quit
On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> This is not "unreliable" it is "clueless".
> Insofar Curt's proposal is technically more correct.
> But actually i see no improvement over my shorter statement.
> (Maybe it's better english, but it's not better message.)
I thought nobody said "should bette
On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Insofar Curt's proposal is technically more correct.
> But actually i see no improvement over my shorter statement.
> (Maybe it's better english, but it's not better message.)
As specified in the part of my article you snipped, the unique purpose
of my prop
Hi,
Curt proposed:
> Wodim has proved to fail under certain conditions and as a general rule
> should probably be avoided when burning to DVD or BD media.
I like this better than what Brian (i assume) committed now:
https://wiki.debian.org/BurnCd?action=diff&rev1=36&rev2=37
"Wodim has pro
On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i wrote:
>> > So how should the statement be improved ?
>> > ["wodim should better not be used with DVD or BD media."]
>
> Curt wrote:
>> You could say:
>> It is preferable not to use wodim for DVD or BD media.
>> Or
>> It's better to avoid using wo
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 06:49:26PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
- Does the wiki have means to discuss facts or to leave messages
to other editors why a particular change was undone ?
Moin doesn't directly have the "talk" feature that some other wikis
do, sorry.
It can have Discussion pages v
On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 19:10:40 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 15:59:26 +, Curt wrote:
>
> > On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > >
> > > Curt wrote:
> > >> > It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too
> > >> > bad we didn't take this opportunity t
Hi,
i wrote towards Jonathan Dowland:
> > Thanks for sparing me the questionable deed to revert the change myself.
> > So it is not a wiki war.
Brian wrote:
> Why is it questionable? Either you stand behind your statement or not.
Wikis going forth and back several times don't make a good impress
Hi,
i wrote:
> > So how should the statement be improved ?
> > ["wodim should better not be used with DVD or BD media."]
Curt wrote:
> You could say:
> It is preferable not to use wodim for DVD or BD media.
> Or
> It's better to avoid using wodim when burning to DVD or BD media.
> Or
> Wodim h
Hi,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> The only 2 reasons I've had for keeping the cdrkit package in Debian
> were:
> 1. hfs hybrid support in genisoimage, a topic that Thomas and I have
>spoken about in the past. Now that we no longer have powerpc in
>Debian stable and I don't have to care about mak
On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 15:59:26 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> >
> > Curt wrote:
> >> > It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too
> >> > bad we didn't take this opportunity to unawkwardate it.
> >
> > Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >> I opted to
On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 17:47:34 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > For the avoidance of any doubt, jmtd is me (Jonathan Michael Thomas
> > Dowland).
>
> Thanks for sparing me the questionable deed to revert the change myself.
> So it is not a wiki war.
Why is it q
Jon Dowland wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>>wodim is factually abandoned by its cloners Joerg Jaspert, Steve McIntyre,
>>and Eduard Bloch. Its home page is gone, its change history is gone.
>
>That would be reason enough to avoid wodim IMHO... but it would
Hey Thomas!
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
>is perhaps the Debian wiki user StephenKeeling subscribed here ?
>We need to discuss the recent wiki change
> https://wiki.debian.org/BurnCd?action=diff&rev1=30&rev2=31
>
>Alternatively:
>- Does the wiki have means to contact
On Friday, September 28, 2018 01:32:38 AM Richard Hector wrote:
> How about something like:
>
> "wodim may sometimes work with DVD or BD media, but the results will not
> meet the relevant specifications."
>
> or perhaps s/work/appear to work/
I am also not an expert in this area, but I would as
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Curt wrote:
> "should better not be used" is a bit twisted.
>
> You could say:
>
> It is preferable not to use wodim for DVD or BD media.
>
> Or:
>
> It's better to avoid using wodim when burning to DVD or BD media.
>
> Or:
>
> Wodim has proved le
On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 16:29:56 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:53:35PM +, Curt wrote:
> > It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too
> > bad we didn't take this opportunity to unawkwardate it.
>
> For the avoidance of any doubt, jmtd is
On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Curt wrote:
>> > It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too
>> > bad we didn't take this opportunity to unawkwardate it.
>
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> I opted to restore the text exactly as it was (a pure revert) rather
>> than
Hi,
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> For the avoidance of any doubt, jmtd is me (Jonathan Michael Thomas
> Dowland).
Thanks for sparing me the questionable deed to revert the change myself.
So it is not a wiki war.
> I'm not involved in cdrkit development.
Nobody is involved there. Else i would chew
On 2018-09-28, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:53:35PM +, Curt wrote:
>>It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too
>>bad we didn't take this opportunity to unawkwardate it.
>
> For the avoidance of any doubt, jmtd is me (Jonathan Michael Thomas
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:53:35PM +, Curt wrote:
It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too
bad we didn't take this opportunity to unawkwardate it.
For the avoidance of any doubt, jmtd is me (Jonathan Michael Thomas
Dowland). I'm not involved in cdrkit developme
On 2018-09-28, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-09-28, Brian wrote:
>> On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 10:57:12 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>>
>>> Hm. Another user "jmtd" is editing in BurnCd.
>>> Now i am curious whether the wodim-DVD-BD statement will be changed too.
>>
>> Have you satisfied your curiosity?
>
> He
On 2018-09-28, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 10:57:12 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
>> Hm. Another user "jmtd" is editing in BurnCd.
>> Now i am curious whether the wodim-DVD-BD statement will be changed too.
>
> Have you satisfied your curiosity?
He says:
revert StephenKeeling's edit
On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 10:57:12 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hm. Another user "jmtd" is editing in BurnCd.
> Now i am curious whether the wodim-DVD-BD statement will be changed too.
Have you satisfied your curiosity?
--
Brian.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 12:46:27PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
I still hope for a statement by the (nominal) wodim maintainers.
I spoke to one this morning, and they're aware of this thread but very
busy, I think they intend to do something at some point, so watch this
space :-)
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾
On 2018-09-28, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 11:02:37 +, Curt wrote:
>
>> On 2018-09-27, Brian wrote:
>> >
>> > "wodim should better not be used with DVD or BD media."
>>
>> The French Wiki has something like:
>>
>> It is preferable not to use wodim with DVD or BD media.
>>
>> Not
Hi,
Curt wrote:
> The French Wiki has something like:
> It is preferable not to use wodim with DVD or BD media.
It advise to stay with this for now.
> > I still hope for a statement by the (nominal) wodim maintainers.
Brian wrote:
> Keep hoping.
Well, Steve McIntyre does show up here from t
On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 11:02:37 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-09-27, Brian wrote:
> >
> > "wodim should better not be used with DVD or BD media."
>
> The French Wiki has something like:
>
> It is preferable not to use wodim with DVD or BD media.
>
> Notice the elimination all weasly padding of
On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 12:46:27 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brian wrote:
> > Then revert the edit and link to this thread:
> > wodim should [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2018/09/msg01031.html
> > better|not be used]] with DVD or BD media.
>
> I still hope for a statement by th
On 2018-09-27, Brian wrote:
>
> "wodim should better not be used with DVD or BD media."
The French Wiki has something like:
It is preferable not to use wodim with DVD or BD media.
Notice the elimination all weasly padding of the "Some believe it would
be better" variety (as began Keeling's un
Hi,
Brian wrote:
> Then revert the edit and link to this thread:
> wodim should [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2018/09/msg01031.html
> better|not be used]] with DVD or BD media.
I still hope for a statement by the (nominal) wodim maintainers.
... or maybe StephenKeeling shows up ...
Ha
On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 10:57:12 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> --
>
> The Debian BurnCd wiki page shall give tangible instructions for users,
> not discuss under what circumstances inappropriate SCSI preparations
> succeed neverth
Hi,
deloptes wrote:
> I was trying to burn DVD+DL and had the feeling it does not do what I want
> it to do. I trashed couple of DL DVDs - each costs ~3€.
Yes. I too experienced that DVD+R DL are the most early type to fail
on an ageing drive. I still have half a spindle of them, but only
for the
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Nevertheless, i plan to defend my version duely, unless a wodim maintainer
> shows up and promises to take care of the bugs and code shortcommings.
> I would be willing to help.
Thanks, I suspected something wrong with DVD writing for a long time
already. Your post tells m
Hi,
Brian proposed:
> There is (strong? extensive?) evidence that wodim should not be used
> with DVD or BD media. However, the many variables involved, especially
> burner types and media type and quality, could result a successful
> burn.
There are not that many variables:
Drive type: burn
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
wodim is factually abandoned by its cloners Joerg Jaspert, Steve McIntyre,
and Eduard Bloch. Its home page is gone, its change history is gone.
That would be reason enough to avoid wodim IMHO... but it would also
suggest that wodim
On 28/09/18 8:00 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> In the case of the BurnCd page, I actually *do* think that it would be
>> of general interest to readers to have a paragraph explaining the limits
>> of wodim, and when not to use it.
>
> Let me try ... hrr-umm ...
>
>
On Thu 27 Sep 2018 at 12:07:02 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Alternatively:
> > - Does the wiki have means to discuss facts or to leave messages
> > to other editors why a particular change was undone ?
>
> The "Comment" box on
Hi,
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> In the case of the BurnCd page, I actually *do* think that it would be
> of general interest to readers to have a paragraph explaining the limits
> of wodim, and when not to use it.
Let me try ... hrr-umm ...
wodim was cloned from cdrecord in 2006. At that time, cdrec
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Alternatively:
> - Does the wiki have means to discuss facts or to leave messages
> to other editors why a particular change was undone ?
The "Comment" box on the edit page is the obvious place to state your
reason for reverting s
Hi,
is perhaps the Debian wiki user StephenKeeling subscribed here ?
We need to discuss the recent wiki change
https://wiki.debian.org/BurnCd?action=diff&rev1=30&rev2=31
Alternatively:
- Does the wiki have means to contact a particular Debian wiki user ?
- Does the wiki have means to
On 2018-05-15 16:12 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> It seems that the dpkg-scanpackages instructions on the Debian wiki
> are wrong. In the generated Packages file, for libltdl7, I get only:
>
> Package: libltdl7
> Source: libtool
> Version: 2.4.6-2.1+local2
> Architectu
It seems that the dpkg-scanpackages instructions on the Debian wiki
are wrong. In the generated Packages file, for libltdl7, I get only:
Package: libltdl7
Source: libtool
Version: 2.4.6-2.1+local2
Architecture: i386
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx
Installed-Size: 417
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14)
Filen
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 08:57:35AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>> On Mon 10 Jul 2017 at 13:32:00 (+), Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>> > On Dom, 09 Jul 2017, tomas wrote:
>> > >So I thin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 08:57:35AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 10 Jul 2017 at 13:32:00 (+), Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > On Dom, 09 Jul 2017, tomas wrote:
> > >So I think the top menu only reacts to the preferred language set in
> > >the
On Mon 10 Jul 2017 at 13:32:00 (+), Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Dom, 09 Jul 2017, tomas wrote:
> >So I think the top menu only reacts to the preferred language set in
> >the browser. The wiki content itself obeys both the URL (i.e. the
> >intercalated /fr/ element) and to the browser prefe
On Dom, 09 Jul 2017, tomas wrote:
So I think the top menu only reacts to the preferred language set in
the browser. The wiki content itself obeys both the URL (i.e. the
intercalated /fr/ element) and to the browser preference.
Does this correspond with your findings?
That's also what happens h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 07:19:24PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 09 Jul 2017 at 17:32:29 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > Perhaps that's something to communicate to the debian-www administrators,
> > as detailed in https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWik
On Sun 09 Jul 2017 at 17:32:29 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Perhaps that's something to communicate to the debian-www administrators,
> as detailed in https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Contact#content-admins
> or in https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Contact#wiki-sys-admins, not
> sure which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 10:55:06AM -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> > From: to...@tuxteam.de
[...]
> > @Fungi4All: if you are interested in constructive discussions and not
> > just in ranting off, please describe what you are seeing, at least
> > with an U
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
>> It"s probably based not on your IP, but on headers sent by your browser
>> (Accept-Language or something like that). There should be somewhere in
>> the settings where you can change that. At least on Firefox there is.
> I can confirm that (tested on https://wiki.debian.
locale/ip even though the language is nowhere used on
> > this pc. But debian-wiki will pick and not reverse the choice? Even though
> > I choose english the drop boxes and menus are an another language based
> > on IP. This makes life hard for traveling users.
>
> It&#x
On 8 de julho de 2017 17:16, Fungi4All wrote:
> I thought only sites for idiots like gloogloo pick on their own the language
> of
> the menus based on locale/ip even though the language is nowhere used on
> this pc. But debian-wiki will pick and not reverse the choice? Even thoug
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017, Fungi4All wrote:
I thought only sites for idiots like gloogloo pick on their own the
language of the menus based on locale/ip even though the language is
nowhere used on this pc. But debian-wiki will pick and not reverse
the choice? Even though I choose english the drop
I thought only sites for idiots like gloogloo pick on their own the language of
the menus based on locale/ip even though the language is nowhere used on
this pc. But debian-wiki will pick and not reverse the choice? Even though
I choose english the drop boxes and menus are an another language
I'd like to suggest a change to the "Simple Backport" wikipage at
https://wiki.debian.org/SimpleBackportCreation
The page suggests using: dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc.
I've found that backporting from unstable goes much more smoothly if
you use: debuild -us -uc instead. The package scripts seem t
Ivan wrote:
>Hello to all,
>
>today I try to open Debian wiki page https://wiki.debian.org/ but I got error:
>
>Forbidden
>You are not allowed to access this!
>
>But when shutdown VPN connection I can to access on debian wiki page. I check
>on my VPN provider and fro
Hello to all,
today I try to open Debian wiki page https://wiki.debian.org/ but I got error:
Forbidden
You are not allowed to access this!
But when shutdown VPN connection I can to access on debian wiki page. I check
on my VPN provider and from VPN side I don't have any limitation.
Any
I was contacted by one of the admins in response to this message and it
seems I got caught as a false positive in the new trap. He put me on
the whitelist and my account is created and running.
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fe
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> Does anyone know if the Debian Wiki is accepting new accounts? I've
> tried to create an account with no apparent success:
>
> Account creation failed: Error 913: please contact
> debian-...@lists.debian.org for help if this continues.
>
> If t
Does anyone know if the Debian Wiki is accepting new accounts? I've
tried to create an account with no apparent success:
Account creation failed: Error 913: please contact
debian-...@lists.debian.org for help if this continues.
If there is no known freeze on new accounts, I'll c
On Lu, 14 ian 13, 17:08:30, Dick Thomas wrote:
>
> I've had bad experiences on the Gentoo wiki with people flaming and
> deleting pages
> so i wanted to make sure what was acceptable as the Debian wiki is a
> little sparse when comapared to others
If in doubt you could as
feel I should post somewhere
>
> That would be great; I suppose that if (1) it is Debian related (like you
> said, "fixed to work on Debian") and (2) you can find a place for it on the
> wiki, then post it!
I've had bad experiences on the Gentoo wiki with people flaming and
Dick Thomas wrote at 2013-01-13 23:19 -0600:
> are there any limits on what can be added to the wiki?
> I'm asking as there are so many things on the arch wiki I've "fixed"
> to work on debian
> that I feel I should post somewhere
That would be great; I suppose that if (1) it is Debian related (li
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
