On 9/29/18, Dominic Knight <dominickni...@gmx.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 08:59 +0000, Curt wrote: >> On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt <scdbac...@gmx.net> wrote: >> > This is not "unreliable" it is "clueless". >> > Insofar Curt's proposal is technically more correct. >> > But actually i see no improvement over my shorter statement. >> > (Maybe it's better english, but it's not better message.) >> >> I thought nobody said "should better not be used," but sticking that >> quoted >> phrase in a search engine produces over 12,000 hits. >> > So 12,000 people can be wrong :) > > Just altering the word order gives more clarity to the statement. > > "should be better not used" While still not entirely correct implies > less of a threat. > > "(it) better not be used (or)" - "the computer gods will frot you" > > "would be better not used" may be correct depending on the rest of the > context. > > Maybe an implicit threat of resulting danger needs to be implied?
Wodim should not be used for burning to DVD or BD media. Which also implies no support for DVD/BD burning. And link "should not be used" to https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2018/09/msg01048.html to explain why it should not be used? Regards, Lee
