On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 15:59:26 +0000, Curt wrote: > On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt <scdbac...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > Curt wrote: > >> > It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too > >> > bad we didn't take this opportunity to unawkwardate it. > > > > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >> I opted to restore the text exactly as it was (a pure revert) rather > >> than improve upon it, although I'm not really sure why I rationalised > >> that. > > > > So how should the statement be improved ? > > "should better not be used" is a bit twisted. > > You could say: > > It is preferable not to use wodim for DVD or BD media. > > Or: > > It's better to avoid using wodim when burning to DVD or BD media. > > Or: > > Wodim has proved less reliable when used with DVD or BD media and is > best avoided when burning to those media.
The last statement is good and the one I'd be inclined to go with, maybe qualifying "less" with "much". -- Brian.
