On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 19:10:40 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 15:59:26 +0000, Curt wrote: > > > On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt <scdbac...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > > > Curt wrote: > > >> > It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too > > >> > bad we didn't take this opportunity to unawkwardate it. > > > > > > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > >> I opted to restore the text exactly as it was (a pure revert) rather > > >> than improve upon it, although I'm not really sure why I rationalised > > >> that. > > > > > > So how should the statement be improved ? > > > > "should better not be used" is a bit twisted. > > > > You could say: > > > > It is preferable not to use wodim for DVD or BD media. > > > > Or: > > > > It's better to avoid using wodim when burning to DVD or BD media. > > > > Or: > > > > Wodim has proved less reliable when used with DVD or BD media and is > > best avoided when burning to those media. > > The last statement is good and the one I'd be inclined to go with, maybe > qualifying "less" with "much".
See what you think on the wiki. --
