On 25/08/2024 17:01, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 25/08/2024 12:39, Joe B wrote:
On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation?
[...]
I gave up and now using K-9 mail and it seems to be working fine.
I use Thunderbird an
On 25/08/2024 12:39, Joe B wrote:
On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation?
[...]
I gave up and now using K-9 mail and it seems to be working fine.
I use Thunderbird and IMAP for gmail. Perhaps I stressed too m
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 10:39:24PM -0700, Joe B wrote:
> On August 24, 2024 7:10:08 PM PDT, Max Nikulin wrote:
> >On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
[...]
> >> I noticed on the list there is a message id. is it possible to copy
> >> the message id to the email so the chain just keeps going ?
> >
On August 24, 2024 7:10:08 PM PDT, Max Nikulin wrote:
>On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
>>
>> IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
>> the conversation?
>
>If you are using gmail web UI and replying to a message from a mailbox then i
On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation?
If you are using gmail web UI and replying to a message from a mailbox
then it should work, just use a proper button so send response to the
mailing list, not a
d the RE with the subject and replying that way.
Honestly, and speaking personally, like many conversations, it depends on
how you are joining in as it were.
for example, I read all the list posts in my inbox. therefore, for this
message, I chose reply, put something at the start so you
ist email and the RE with the subject and replying that way.
> >
> > I noticed on the list there is a message id. is it possible to copy
> > the message id to the email so the chain just keeps going ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Joe B
> >
> >
> i guess, it dep
On 8/24/24 17:36, Joe B wrote:
Hello,
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation? as of right now i'm just putting the debian-user
list email and the RE with the subject and replying that way.
I noticed on the list there is a message id.
ail and the RE with the subject and replying that way.
>
> I noticed on the list there is a message id. is it possible to copy
> the message id to the email so the chain just keeps going ?
>
> Thanks
> Joe B
>
>
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 14:36:09 -0700, Joe B wrote:
> IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
> the conversation? as of right now i'm just putting the debian-user
> list email and the RE with the subject and replying that way.
>
> I noticed on
Am 24.08.2024 um 23:36 schrieb Joe B:
> Hello,
>
> IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
> the conversation? as of right now i'm just putting the debian-user
> list email and the RE with the subject and replying that way.
>
> I noti
Hello,
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation? as of right now i'm just putting the debian-user
list email and the RE with the subject and replying that way.
I noticed on the list there is a message id. is it possible to copy
the message id t
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:25:00PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
[...]
> Guilty as charged. :-(
>
>
> Using Thunderbird, clicking "Reply List" and changing the Subject to
> "new subject [was: old subject]" is NOT the way to do it. Clicking
> "Write", and cutting and pasting the Subject and/
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:11:12 +
Guyenne Tsui wrote:
> Thank you Charles,
You're welcome.
>
> Anyway do you have idea you can help me in resolving the graphics
> issue?
It's outside my expertise, or I would have replied with something. The
only thing I can think of is to try the backports k
Thank you Charles,
Anyway do you have idea you can help me in resolving the graphics issue?
Should I post this again as a separate thread to gather more expertise?
Bests Regards,
Guyenne
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:04:19 +
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:37:37 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> Hello Celejar,
>
> >Under Preferences, I have a Compose tab, but no Writing one, and the
>
> Writing is under Compose; This is in Claws - Sylpheed may well differ.
Yes; as I said, I
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:37:37 -0500
Celejar wrote:
Hello Celejar,
>Under Preferences, I have a Compose tab, but no Writing one, and the
Writing is under Compose; This is in Claws - Sylpheed may well differ.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:51:13 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:41:42 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > Ah, yes. Those are Sylpheed options ;) But there's no general way to
> > instruct these MUAs to automatically default to 'reply-to-list' for
> > any reply to a list mail (i.e., any
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:41:42 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> Ah, yes. Those are Sylpheed options ;) But there's no general way to
> instruct these MUAs to automatically default to 'reply-to-list' for
> any reply to a list mail (i.e., any mail with a 'List-ID: ' header),
> correct?
Try Configuration -> Pre
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:29:22 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:10:13 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On my Sylpheed, ordinary 'Reply' won't do reply-to-list, and I have to
> > specifically ask for that (-L by default). I couldn't find a
> > configuration option to change that, but
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:10:13 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> On my Sylpheed, ordinary 'Reply' won't do reply-to-list, and I have to
> specifically ask for that (-L by default). I couldn't find a
> configuration option to change that, but I might have missed
> something.
In Claws-Mail, you can do it on a p
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:08:14 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
...
> In general 'Reply' defaults to Sender, with a few exceptions:
>
> 1. A smart mailer that detects the message is from a mailing list, most
> likely configurable (e.g. Claws Mail already mentioned, probably
> Sylpheed as well)
On
On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 3:14 AM Teemu Likonen wrote:
> I guess we all know by now that mail user agent software don't agree
> with all the different semantics of replying. Widely supported features
> are "reply to sender" (Reply-To, From) and "reply to all".
* 2020-12-06 16:39:29Z, Brad Rogers wrote:
> I'm struggling to think of any use other than 'use the address in the
> Reply-To header to ensure you send your message to the correct place'.
That's easy. Reply-To may not have the address which some other person
thinks is the correct place for his or
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 09:49:41 -0500
Stefan Monnier wrote:
Hello Stefan,
>The problem is that you intend your "Reply-To:" to mean one thing, but
>other people use "Reply-To:" to mean something else (many use it
I'm struggling to think of any use other than 'use the address in the
Reply-To header
> My mistake; I didn't mean broken in the non-RFC compliant sense, but
> broken in the sense of "Not what I want to take place". I set a
The problem is that you intend your "Reply-To:" to mean one thing, but
other people use "Reply-To:" to mean something else (many use it
without knowing what th
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 15:42:49 +0200
Teemu Likonen wrote:
Hello Teemu,
>It's not broken; it's perfectly valid and allowed.
My mistake; I didn't mean broken in the non-RFC compliant sense, but
broken in the sense of "Not what I want to take place". I set a
Reply-To because that's where I want th
* 2020-12-06 11:23:06Z, Brad Rogers wrote:
> I set a Reply-To for mailing list mails because I *DO NOT WANT* a
> private reply. Your treatment of that is completely broken. Credit the
> sender with some intelligence, and do as they request.
It's not broken; it's perfectly valid and allowed. Reply
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 07:01:46 -0500
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello rhkra...@gmail.com,
>Hmm, I might send a public message and want a private reply
Certainly there are people that do that, but I don't;
It's inviting an accident to happen.
If I'm following up on a list mail privately (it's rare,
On Sunday, December 06, 2020 06:23:06 AM Brad Rogers wrote:
> If I wanted a private reply, I wouldn't have sent the message to the
> list in the first place.
Hmm, I might send a public message and want a private reply (or at least, not
be surprised if I got a private reply).
For instance, if I w
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 11:14:25 +0200
Teemu Likonen wrote:
Hello Teemu,
>There is sense in this. Reply means "reply to sender". If Reply-To has
>the same address as in To/Cc then the Reply-To address probably is not
>sender's address. So don't honour Reply-To and use From instead. It is
>also a saf
ser agent software don't agree
with all the different semantics of replying. Widely supported features
are "reply to sender" (Reply-To, From) and "reply to all". Debian
mailing list policy (send only to list address) is not easy for many
mail user agents. "Re
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:08:14 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Hello Andrei,
> 2. A Reply-To is set, either by the list[1] or by the Sender
Even with one set, many ppl /still/ manage to not honour it.
I've lost count of the number of time replies have come to me only,
despite setting a list address f
On Saturday, December 05, 2020 04:08:14 PM Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> In general 'Reply' defaults to Sender, with a few exceptions:
>
> 1. A smart mailer that detects the message is from a mailing list, most
> likely configurable (e.g. Claws Mail already mentioned, probably
> Sylpheed as well)
an
On Sb, 05 dec 20, 12:20:02, Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
> I am also on Gmail. When I click (or tap) on Reply, it invariably wants me
> to send the Reply to the individual who sent the email, as opposed to the
> Debian Users List. So one additional task for me is to edit the "To"
> field, so that it
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 12:20:02 -0500
Kenneth Parker wrote:
> I am also on Gmail. When I click (or tap) on Reply, it invariably
> wants me to send the Reply to the individual who sent the email, as
> opposed to the Debian Users List. So one additional task for me is
> to edit the "To" field, so tha
On Sat, 2020-12-05 at 12:20 -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> I am also on Gmail. When I click (or tap) on Reply, it invariably wants me
> to send the Reply to the individual who sent the email, as opposed to the
> Debian Users List. So one additional task for me is to edit the "To"
> field, so that
s a
> common shortcut for the purpose. Your mail reader should pick up the
> information necessary so the rest of us will see your reply as part of
> the thread.
>
> Two thoughts on netiquette...
>
> Trim the text to which you are replying. Get rid of text not
> immediately releva
f
the thread.
Two thoughts on netiquette...
Trim the text to which you are replying. Get rid of text not
immediately relevant to your reply. Gmail hides that for you, so you
don't see it. Other mail readers don't hide it. I did so above.
You put two separate subjects (your GPU problem
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 23:32 -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:22:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:03:52 -0400
> > Nick Lidakis wrote:
> >
> > > How does one reply to a thread on this list if I accidentally erased the
> > > threads or the thread was never
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:32:53PM -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Thanks. It will bring up Icedove. How do I get that header info to Mutt?
Set mutt up to handle mailto: urls with something like
http://mailtomutt.sourceforge.net/
or http://madduck.net/blog/2007.01.14:firefox-handing-mailto-links-to-
Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > Nick Lidakis wrote:
> > > How does one reply to a thread on this list if I accidentally erased the
> > > threads or the thread was never in your inbox to begin with? I want to
> > > reply
> > > to this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/07/msg01613.h
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:22:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:03:52 -0400
> Nick Lidakis wrote:
>
> > How does one reply to a thread on this list if I accidentally erased the
> > threads or the thread was never in your inbox to begin with? I want to reply
> > to this: http://l
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:03:52 -0400
Nick Lidakis wrote:
> How does one reply to a thread on this list if I accidentally erased the
> threads or the thread was never in your inbox to begin with? I want to reply
> to this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/07/msg01613.html
Just click on the
How does one reply to a thread on this list if I accidentally erased the
threads or the thread was never in your inbox to begin with? I want to reply
to this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/07/msg01613.html
I had an issue with Verizon's email server where the my OP and replies never
show
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
> Glad to help. I also learn a lot from this list :-)
Me too. Hope I will be helpful to other Debian users too, one day. :)
> > It does not work for me, nor I want it, actually. But it should be
> > so - it is true.
>
> Does not work? :-?
Yea, th
Ken Heard wrote:
> Sthu Deus wrote:
> > Good day.
> >
> > I want to continue an old talk that once was on the list. How I can do
> > it? - How I can direct my reply to that very thread?
>
> I seem to remember that sometime in the past people objected to an "old"
> thread being "reopened" by a new
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:21:10 -0500, Ken Heard wrote:
> Sthu Deus wrote:
>> Good day.
>>
>> I want to continue an old talk that once was on the list. How I can do
>> it? - How I can direct my reply to that very thread?
>
> I seem to remember that sometime in the past people objected to an "old"
>
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:12:38 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón - You are doing great job
> answering here! Thanks to You for Your work, again:
Glad to help. I also learn a lot from this list :-)
>> When you hit "reply to → list" your e-mail client gets opened
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good day.
>
> I want to continue an old talk that once was on the list. How I can do
> it? - How I can direct my reply to that very thread?
I seem to remember that sometime in the past people objected to an "old"
thread being "reop
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón - You are doing great job
answering here! Thanks to You for Your work, again:
> When you hit "reply to → list" your e-mail client gets opened and is
> automatically set the address of this mailing list in "To:" field ;-)
It does not work for me, nor I
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:42:56 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> I want to continue an old talk that once was on the list. How I can do
> it? - How I can direct my reply to that very thread?
>
> In the list archives I see 3 links: reply to: list, user-online/offline.
>
> But I use a mail client - what sho
Good day.
I want to continue an old talk that once was on the list. How I can do
it? - How I can direct my reply to that very thread?
In the list archives I see 3 links: reply to: list,
user-online/offline.
But I use a mail client - what should I specify in to field?
Thank You for Your time.
John,
I see you are using Thunderbird as am I. Assuming your using the 2
pane view with the preview pane, you can easily click the drop down +
just to the left of the subject to reveal additional header information
and you should see the list's debian-user@lists.debian.org address.. You
shou
Kelly Clowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Nov 18, 2007 9:12 AM, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:34:27PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> > > There is one tip I have for you: use a mailer that has better support
> > > for mailing lists than your current one,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:48:55PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > Because Doug has set "Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org"
>
> Not intentionally. Perhaps mutt does that with my "subscribe
> debian-..." directive in my .muttrc. I thought that the debian lists
> did that.
Yep,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:01:42PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:09:58PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
> > Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If I use "reply-to-all", icedove adds the original sender in the "To:"
> >>> field and the debian-user address in the "CC:" f
On 2007-11-18 23:14 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 11/18/07 18:01, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> Because Doug has set "Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org"
>
> How do you do that in tbird?
It is possible, but very inconvenient. Look at
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Custom_headers how to set th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/07 18:01, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:09:58PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
[snip]
>> Thank you Doug, I just noticed that when I hit reply-to-all, your email did
>> not appear in the "To:" list, and just the d-u list
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:18:46PM -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>
> > Also why do you say you'd have to use IMAP with mutt to get what you
> > want? Unless you need to be able to read (using mutt) your mail from
> > several different systems I don't see how it would help you.
>
> I do want to acc
On Nov 18, 2007 11:30 AM, Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 10:48:29AM -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 2007 9:12 AM, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:34:27PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > >
> > > > There is one tip
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 10:48:29AM -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 9:12 AM, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:34:27PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> > > There is one tip I have for you: use a mailer that has better support
> > > for mailing l
On Nov 18, 2007 9:12 AM, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:34:27PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > There is one tip I have for you: use a mailer that has better support
> > for mailing lists than your current one, e.g. KMail. Mutt and Gnus
> > are even bette
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:09:58PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>>
>>> If I use "reply-to-all", icedove adds the original sender in the "To:"
>>> field and the debian-user address in the "CC:" field. If I send it in
>>> this way, will the sender receive two posts? I
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:34:27PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> There is one tip I have for you: use a mailer that has better support
> for mailing lists than your current one, e.g. KMail. Mutt and Gnus
> are even better, but they are difficult to set up.
I'm wondering what is difficult about
Hi.
Raj Kiran Grandhi, 18.11.2007 15:45:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> There is one tip I have for you: use a mailer that has better support
>> for mailing lists than your current one, e.g. KMail. Mutt and Gnus
>> are even better, but they are difficult to set up. If you want to
>> stick to Thunde
Sven Joachim wrote:
There is one tip I have for you: use a mailer that has better support
for mailing lists than your current one, e.g. KMail. Mutt and Gnus
are even better, but they are difficult to set up. If you want to
stick to Thunderbird/Icedove, there is a "ReplyToList" extension at
htt
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
If I use "reply-to-all", icedove adds the original sender in the "To:"
field and the debian-user address in the "CC:" field. If I send it in
this way, will the sender receive two posts? I never received multiple
replies to any of my posts, so I think the list software
Raj Kiran Grandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This question has been nagging me every time I reply to some
> post. What is the recommended way to reply to any message?
To reply to the list only, unless the sender wishes otherwise. See
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct.
> If I
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:30:49PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
> This question has been nagging me every time I reply to some post. What
> is the recommended way to reply to any message?
>
> If I use "reply-to-all", icedove adds the original sender in the "To:"
> field and the debian-user ad
Hi,
This question has been nagging me every time I reply to some post. What
is the recommended way to reply to any message?
If I use "reply-to-all", icedove adds the original sender in the "To:"
field and the debian-user address in the "CC:" field. If I send it in
this way, will the sender r
It fails to start Icedove.
It appears to work if Icedove is already running.
Last weekend I attempted a reply to Andrei's
message; I have not found the reply on the list.
Perhaps there is a time limit for replying.
If anyone can recognize why the script fails to
start Icedove and
On 10/10/2007 07:03 PM, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
Andrei, Mumia & others,
At Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:57:52 -0500 Mumia Paduille wrote,
"I'm assuming you're subscribed, ..."
Not subscribed. The volume is overwhelming.
I read the Web based archive.
Normal replying is difficu
Icedove is already running.
Last weekend I attempted a reply to Andrei's
message; I have not found the reply on the list.
Perhaps there is a time limit for replying.
If anyone can recognize why the script fails to
start Icedove and suggest a correction, a
response is welcome.
Thanks,
Jeff D:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Urs Thuermann wrote:
>
>> When I ping to the broacast address or the allhosts multicast address
>> I get replies from the embedded and the self-built sysem, but not from
>> the two Debian boxes:
-- snip
> if you want it to reply to broadcast pings:
> echo 0 > /proc/s
Jeff D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if you want it to reply to broadcast pings:
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts
Ah, thanks. This not only causes replies to broadcast pings to be
sent but also multicast to 224.0.0.1 (which is allhosts multicast and
essentially the same
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Urs Thuermann wrote:
I have currently 4 Linux machines in my network, one embedded system
running Linux-2.4.20, a system build from scractch over the last 13
years running 2.4.34.2 and two Debian boxes, both running Debian's
Linux kernel 2.6.18-4-686.
When I ping to the bro
I have currently 4 Linux machines in my network, one embedded system
running Linux-2.4.20, a system build from scractch over the last 13
years running 2.4.34.2 and two Debian boxes, both running Debian's
Linux kernel 2.6.18-4-686.
When I ping to the broacast address or the allhosts multicast addre
ress. I'll say what has been said
> many times already. Please quit replying to SPAM!
I have looked at that more times - I don't think it is spam. If I even
wouldn't be sure if it's spam, I would not reply.
However I won't reply this user anymore - if he did not read t
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:50:41PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Sorry all for solving this on the list, but I found it impossible to contact
> that person off-list.
>
Because it is SPAM with a spoofed address. I'll say what has been said
many times already. Please qu
> On Thursday 25 January 2007 10:26, Easthope wrote:
> > When I work at home, thunderbird can send a
> > reply to a message posted on this list.
> >
> > Presumeably it sends the Message-id of the
> > preceeding message, or a thread identifier
> > to the list maintenance program to allow
> > connect
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 05:10:25AM +, s. keeling wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:00:44AM -0800, Easthope wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for replying and copying to me.
> > >
> > > wl> Well
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:00:44AM -0800, Easthope wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for replying and copying to me.
> >
> > wl> Well, if your web-based MUA supports it, it can and should
> > wl> do threading correctly.
Wesley,
Thanks for replying and copying to me.
wl> Well, if your web-based MUA supports it, it can and should
do threading correctly.
No evidence that this MUA supports threading,
that I have seen.
wl> Barring that, as long as the subject stays intact, often other
people's
On the other hand if
someone posts a new message with an identical subject or replies to a digest
and changes the subject appropriately Mutt threads those kind of
replies/posts separately. In the case of a new message with an
identical/siumilar subject that's probably a good thing. Peopl
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:00:44AM -0800, Easthope wrote:
> Wesley,
>
> Thanks for replying and copying to me.
>
> wl> Well, if your web-based MUA supports it, it can and should
> do threading correctly.
>
> No evidence that this MUA supports threading,
> that
On Thursday 25 January 2007 12:00, Easthope wrote:
> wl> Barring that, as long as the subject stays intact, often other
> people's MUA will do pseudo-threading by subject line if there is no
> other
> threading information in the headers.
>
> Not clear about this. Are you saying I should
> try to
On Thursday 25 January 2007 10:26, Easthope wrote:
> When I work at home, thunderbird can send a
> reply to a message posted on this list.
>
> Presumeably it sends the Message-id of the
> preceeding message, or a thread identifier
> to the list maintenance program to allow
> connecting the new mess
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:26:12AM -0800, Easthope wrote:
>
> Thunderbird is not available when I am away
> from home. Then I must use a Web based MUA,
> MailSite Express version 7.0.3, Rockliffe
> Email Server.
>
> In this circumstance, is there any way to
> reply to a message so that the
"Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FYI, you should reply to the full list, not to a poster only, as others
> > may be interested in the question and answer.
> If I'm not sure of what I'm saying I try to minimise the traffic on the list
> by sending a private message, asking for
Am 2006-06-21 17:03:23, schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
> For users of virus-ridden OSes that also means that e-mail viruses
> remain on the system until they are deleted, expunged and compacted
> (yes, three individual manual steps!)
...and if you have had no Virus-Scanner installed, a new AV-Sof
On 24.06.06 14:05, David E. Fox wrote:
> But at this job, everything was top post. The emailer pretty much
> forced you to edit that way - I recall spending time tryiing to
> reformat the emails to look like what I'm used to, but eventually gave
> up. After all, it's a different environment, and ju
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 07:42 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Le samedi 24 juin 2006 à 21:18 -0500, Default User a écrit :
> > Gee, I almst hate to ask, but:
> >
> > I use the defult Evolution email client in Debian stable. When I choose
> > "reply to list" w
Le samedi 24 juin 2006 à 21:18 -0500, Default User a écrit :
> Gee, I almst hate to ask, but:
>
> I use the defult Evolution email client in Debian stable. When I choose
> "reply to list" when replying to a post on debian-user@lists.debian.org
> instead of putting that
Gee, I almst hate to ask, but:
I use the defult Evolution email client in Debian stable. When I choose
"reply to list" when replying to a post on debian-user@lists.debian.org
instead of putting that in the to: field, it puts the word
Debian
underlined in the to: field instead.
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-24 05:00:28 -0500]:
> What problem do you see with Tbird?
Nothing, really, for quick basic setup, it's terrific, and using imap mailboxes
does indeed let you switch between mua's at will..
Tbird out of the box, though, does not let me sort mailboxes t
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:36:15 +
"Lynn Kilroy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use MSN Hotmail. Seems MSN Hotmail doesn't work quite the same way your
> cludgy e-mail clients {oft mentioned in your article} do.
I've never liked web-based email. Enough said. :)
> Furthermore, most common user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23
> 13:13:50 -0700]:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>>
>
>> yes. bring on the brick-bats!
>>
> Hear,
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 08:19:55AM +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23 13:13:50 -0700]:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > >
>
> > yes. bring on the brick-bats!
> >
> Hear,
* s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-24 01:35:42 +]:
> For Steve Lamb? Essentially the moon.
Heh,heh...
--
Cheers,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
