6. Installed a desktop environment and thought that the GNOME desktop
would
support my USB drives. No icon, no notification, nothing. Plug and
play
isn't supported in any way on the GNOME desktop.
I just got udev and gnome-volume-manager working on my system, and the
plug and play is gre
Hello,
I once again tried the latest daily build of the installer at the weekend.
I used the linux26 kernel and was quite happy with the installer. After
rebooting the system the glitches came up.
1. Inserting 14 CDs is a real pain, why isn't the file list on the first
disk of a set? I reinst
Bug#220615: installation-reports: beta-1 hp kayak
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thank you for submitting an installation report!
Stopping processing her
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220644 installation
Bug#220644: installation-reports: Can't install with scsi cd-rom without floppy
drive
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Bug#220615: installation-reports: beta-1 hp kayak
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thank you for submitting an installation report!
Stopping processing her
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220644 installation
Bug#220644: installation-reports: Can't install with scsi cd-rom without floppy drive
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.$
Modify Date on the .iso was 2003-11-09.
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Date: 2003-11-12
Method:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.$
Modify Date on the .iso was 2003-11-09.
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Date: 2003-11-12
Method:
Package: installation-reports
Version: beta1
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: beta1 i386 BusinessCard
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-686 #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST 2003 i686
GNU/Linux
l
Date: Wed Nov 12 20:52:52 EST 2003
Method: Booted from BusinessCard iso, installed
Package: installation-reports
Version: beta1
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: beta1 i386 BusinessCard
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-686 #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
l
Date: Wed Nov 12 20:52:52 EST 2003
Method: Booted from BusinessCard iso, installed
Package: installation-reports
Version: Beta 1
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Beta 1, downloaded from
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/20031109/images/{boot,}floppy-image.img
uname -a:
Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 unknow
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 220386 -1 -2
Bug#220386: INSTALL REPORT
Bug 220386 cloned as bugs 220482-220483.
> reassign -1 anna
Bug#220482: INSTALL REPORT
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `anna'.
> retitle -1 anna: elaborate on "integrity check failed"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 220117 -1 -2 -3 -4
Bug#220117: Installation report
Bug 220117 cloned as bugs 220475-220478.
> reassign -1 base-installer
Bug#220475: Installation report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
&
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220202 installation
Bug#220202: Install report: IDE floppy boot fails
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 220386 -1 -2
Bug#220386: INSTALL REPORT
Bug 220386 cloned as bugs 220482-220483.
> reassign -1 anna
Bug#220482: INSTALL REPORT
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `anna'.
> retitle -1 anna: elaborate on "integrity check failed"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220258 partitioner
Bug#220258: Failure at cfdisk on HP Pavillion laptop
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partitioner'.
> retitle 220258 partitioner: fails on priority critical
Bug#220258: Failure at cfdisk on HP Pavillion
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 220117 -1 -2 -3 -4
Bug#220117: Installation report
Bug 220117 cloned as bugs 220475-220478.
> reassign -1 base-installer
Bug#220475: Installation report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
&
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220202 installation
Bug#220202: Install report: IDE floppy boot fails
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220258 partitioner
Bug#220258: Failure at cfdisk on HP Pavillion laptop
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partitioner'.
> retitle 220258 partitioner: fails on priority critical
Bug#220258: Failure at cfdisk on HP Pavillion
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220371 installation
Bug#220371: Install Report: CDs not bootable
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'.
> severity 220371 important
Bug#220371: Install Report: CDs not bootable
Severity set to `important'.
> tag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220371 installation
Bug#220371: Install Report: CDs not bootable
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'.
> severity 220371 important
Bug#220371: Install Report: CDs not bootable
Severity set to `important'.
> tag
titude D600
Changed Bug title.
> tags -4 + d-i
Bug#220269: base-config: should use d-i's apt config
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> close 220223
Bug#220223: Install on Dell Latitude D600
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug close
#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks for your installation report!
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
titude D600
Changed Bug title.
> tags -4 + d-i
Bug#220269: base-config: should use d-i's apt config
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> close 220223
Bug#220223: Install on Dell Latitude D600
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug close
#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks for your installation report!
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
but many oddities
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Frank Otto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks for submitting your installation report!
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
ssful, but many oddities
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Frank Otto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks for submitting your installation report!
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
m: Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network installation report
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 22:45:23 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 r
c 2002 00:38:56 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation-reports: Network installation report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-A
"us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 21:54:15 -0400
M
19 Dec 2002 06:26:05 +
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 06:26:05 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: installation report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inli
TED]>; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 22:58:23 +0100
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 22:58:23 +0100
From: Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network installation report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plai
m: Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network installation report
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 22:45:23 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 r
c 2002 00:38:56 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation-reports: Network installation report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mu
"us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 21:54:15 -0400
M
19 Dec 2002 06:26:05 +
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 06:26:05 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: installation report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inli
gt;; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 22:58:23 +0100
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 22:58:23 +0100
From: Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network installation report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plai
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:22:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 219613 -1 -2
Bug#219613: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiserfs really hard to get;
maybe grub issue; interface glitch
Bug 219613 cloned as bugs 220130-220131.
> reassign -1 grub-installer
Bug#220130: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiser
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 219937 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9
Bug#219937: WINGS
Bug 219937 cloned as bugs 220118-220126.
> reassign -1 partitioner
Bug#220118: WINGS
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partitioner'.
> retitle -1 partitioner: should integr
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:36:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line thanks for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:36:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line thanks for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:22:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: installation-reports
Priority: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
(9 nov 2003 16:43)
uname -a: vmlinuz-2.4.22-1-386 (can't run uname -a, already booted back
to my normal Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 219613 -1 -2
Bug#219613: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiserfs really hard to get; maybe grub
issue; interface glitch
Bug 219613 cloned as bugs 220130-220131.
> reassign -1 grub-installer
Bug#220130: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiser
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 219937 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9
Bug#219937: WINGS
Bug 219937 cloned as bugs 220118-220126.
> reassign -1 partitioner
Bug#220118: WINGS
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partitioner'.
> retitle -1 partitioner: should integr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220048 installation
Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot, no floppy images
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'.
> retitle 220048 Cannot boot from CD
Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot,
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:36:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line thanks for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:36:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line thanks for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: installation-reports
Priority: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
(9 nov 2003 16:43)
uname -a: vmlinuz-2.4.22-1-386 (can't run uname -a, already booted back
to my normal Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220048 installation
Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot, no floppy images
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'.
> retitle 220048 Cannot boot from CD
Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot,
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> * displaying the devfs path for a drive ... how an user can handle that ? You
> should
> have "MBR on boot disk" and "Others disk" choices ...
>
> * the ide-scsi/fstab bug create a sort of loop ... no way to quit in a
> correct way
> (just hit ctrl+C several times ...
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2003-11-10
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-10 (beta-1)
uname -a: "Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-i386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686
GNU/Linux"
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:10:00 +0100
Method: How did you install? Wh
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> * displaying the devfs path for a drive ... how an user can handle that ? You should
> have "MBR on boot disk" and "Others disk" choices ...
>
> * the ide-scsi/fstab bug create a sort of loop ... no way to quit in a correct way
> (just hit ctrl+C several times ...), no
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2003-11-10
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-10 (beta-1)
uname -a: "Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-i386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux"
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:10:00 +0100
Method: How did you install? Wha
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-09, www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 unknown
Date: 2003-11-09 8:30 PM PST
Method: Net install CD
Machine: Digital PC 3000
P
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-09, www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 unknown
Date: 2003-11-09 8:30 PM PST
Method: Net install CD
Machine: Digital PC 3000
P
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-09, www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 unknown
Date: 2003-11-09 6:30 PM PST
Method: Business card CD
Machine: Digital PC 3000
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-09, www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 unknown
Date: 2003-11-09 6:30 PM PST
Method: Business card CD
Machine: Digital PC 3000
Philip Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After rebooting I examined the file /etc/network/interfaces, all it
> contained were two comment lines.
I have just realised this is a duplicate of bug 218617,
"netcfg: No network config in sarge netinstall"
--
Philip Martin
After rebooting I examined the file /etc/network/interfaces, all it
contained were two comment lines. I added the lines
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet dhcp
and ran 'ifup eth1', that brought up the interface, negotiated a DHCP
lease, etc.
--
Philip Martin
Philip Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After rebooting I examined the file /etc/network/interfaces, all it
> contained were two comment lines.
I have just realised this is a duplicate of bug 218617,
"netcfg: No network config in sarge netinstall"
--
Philip Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
After rebooting I examined the file /etc/network/interfaces, all it
contained were two comment lines. I added the lines
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet dhcp
and ran 'ifup eth1', that brought up the interface, negotiated a DHCP
lease, etc.
--
Philip Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: installation-reports
Version: N/A; reported 2003-11-07
Severity: normal
I downloaded the network install ISO from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
dated Nov 6. I am installing on an dual PIII box (i.e. SMP) with
aic7xxx SCSI and two via-rhine ethernet cards.
Package: installation-reports
Version: N/A; reported 2003-11-07
Severity: normal
I downloaded the network install ISO from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
dated Nov 6. I am installing on an dual PIII box (i.e. SMP) with
aic7xxx SCSI and two via-rhine ethernet cards.
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version : 1.10, Oct 8 2003
uname -a:
Linux flit 2.4.22-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 5 20:56:48 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date installed: Oct 9 2003
Method: used
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso.
Boo
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version : 1.10, Oct 8 2003
uname -a:
Linux flit 2.4.22-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 5 20:56:48 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date installed: Oct 9 2003
Method: used
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso. Boot
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:19:56PM +0200, Tim Vandermeersch wrote:
> I already had a swap partition on my hard disk, and choose "Leave the file
> system intact". But instead of using that partition as swap, the installer
> asked me where I wanted to mount the swap partition (/, /usr, /boot, ...).
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:19:56PM +0200, Tim Vandermeersch wrote:
> I already had a swap partition on my hard disk, and choose "Leave the file
> system intact". But instead of using that partition as swap, the installer
> asked me where I wanted to mount the swap partition (/, /usr, /boot, ...).
See attached installation report.
--
Regards,
Tim Vandermeersch
Belgian skolelinux team
http://i18n.skolelinux.bo/belgium
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-09-26 http://gluck.debian.org
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686
GNU/Linux
Date
See attached installation report.
--
Regards,
Tim Vandermeersch
Belgian skolelinux team
http://i18n.skolelinux.bo/belgium
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-09-26 http://gluck.debian.org
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2003
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-22
Severity: normal
*** install-report.template
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-09-16
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Sep 21 14:15:10 CDT 2003 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 20
==2045672785=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation-report: Sarge Installation Report
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:21:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTE
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-22
Severity: normal
*** install-report.template
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2003-09-16
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Sep 21 14:15:10 CDT 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 200
==2045672785=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation-report: Sarge Installation Report
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:21:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTE
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-22
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20030921
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2003/09/22
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-22
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20030921
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2003/09/22
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 14-Sep-2003 16:15 116M
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2003-09-15
Method:
I've booted fr
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 14-Sep-2003 16:15 116M
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2003-09-15
Method:
I've booted fro
ons 2003-08-06 klockan 03.54 skrev David Z Maze:
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
> Initial attempt was a network install, which threw me into the text-mode
> interface. Notes:
What do you mean "network install"? Did you explicitly pick 'net' as
boot
Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ons 2003-08-06 klockan 03.54 skrev David Z Maze:
>> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>
>> Initial attempt was a network install, which threw me into the text-mode
>> interface. Notes:
>
> What do you mean "net
Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ons 2003-08-06 klockan 03.54 skrev David Z Maze:
>> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>
>> Initial attempt was a network install, which threw me into the text-mode
>> interface. Notes:
>
> What do you mean "net
ons 2003-08-06 klockan 03.54 skrev David Z Maze:
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
> Initial attempt was a network install, which threw me into the text-mode
> interface. Notes:
What do you mean "network install"? Did you explicitly pick 'net' as
boot
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-05
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version: Downloaded
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
around 2 PM eastern (18:00 UTC) Tue 5 Aug 2003
uname -a:
Linux (none) 2.4.21-3-386 #3 Sun Jul 2
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-05
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version: Downloaded
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
around 2 PM eastern (18:00 UTC) Tue 5 Aug 2003
uname -a:
Linux (none) 2.4.21-3-386 #3 Sun Jul 2
sön 2003-04-13 klockan 20.02 skrev Josh Metzler:
> (1) The machine booted just fine, and the install seemed to be going well. I
> put a ? for Load installer modules, because I'm not sure how that went.
> After or while loading rootskel_0.26_i386_udeb, I got the message:
>
> tar: ./linuxrc: Tex
sön 2003-03-09 klockan 15.36 skrev Stephane Enten:
> Comments/Problems:
> The install went fine (thought swap creation couldn't be done, since
> there's no mkswap on the / filesystem, but anyway), but when it came to
Yes, this is a known issue.
> install the kernel (or later, the boot loader, or
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso 09-Apr-2003
from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/
uname -a: Linux Shuttle 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686
unknown unknown GNU/Linux (Note: the install failed, so I ended up installing
using b
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~tfheen/d-i/images/2003-03-08/archive/
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.19-386 #1 Mon Nov 18 21:50:03 EST 2002 i686 unknown
Date: 2003/03/09
Method: Network installation. Boot from floppy, with packages got via HTTP from
the ftp.
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~tfheen/d-i/images/2003-03-08/archive/
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.19-386 #1 Mon Nov 18 21:50:03 EST 2002 i686 unknown
Date: 2003/03/09
Method: Network installation. Boot from floppy, with packages got via HTTP from
the ftp.
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-20
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: net-1440.img from
http://people.debian.org/~tfheen/d-i/images/2002-12-19/archive/
uname -a: on installed system (after reboot)
Linux debian 2.4.19-386 #1 Sun Oct 6 17:
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-20
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: net-1440.img from
http://people.debian.org/~tfheen/d-i/images/2002-12-19/archive/
uname -a: on installed system (after reboot)
Linux debian 2.4.19-386 #1 Sun Oct 6 17:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: The first URL in that initial announcment. I
donwloaded it the day it was posted [or so]
uname -a: Linux brendans-laptop 2.4.19-386 #1 Sun Oct 6 17:23:00 EST 2002 i686
Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Date: T
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: The first URL in that initial announcment. I donwloaded it
the day it was posted [or so]
uname -a: Linux brendans-laptop 2.4.19-386 #1 Sun Oct 6 17:23:00 EST 2002 i686 Pentium
III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Date: T
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-13
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
(hope this isn't duplicated, it seems i haven't been sent the first
time.)
Debian-installer-version:
Daily-built images from Joey Hess : net-initrd.gz, vmlinuz.
Got Fri Dec 13 around 18
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-13
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
Daily-built images from Joey Hess : net-initrd.gz, vmlinuz.
Got Fri Dec 13 around 18:00 CET
(so this report doesn't concern the alpha release)
Date: Fri De
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-13
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
(hope this isn't duplicated, it seems i haven't been sent the first
time.)
Debian-installer-version:
Daily-built images from Joey Hess : net-initrd.gz, vmlinuz.
Got Fri Dec 13 around 18
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-13
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
Daily-built images from Joey Hess : net-initrd.gz, vmlinuz.
Got Fri Dec 13 around 18:00 CET
(so this report doesn't concern the alpha release)
Date: Fri De
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 12:03:39PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Because it would be very confusing in the distro prompt, and woody is
> frozen.
You've lost me.
--
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Jeremiah Merkl wrote:
> "woody" should never be a valid setting, in my opinion.
Why? "woody" will always be a valid url until it's retired.
--
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
