Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:32:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line I already resubmitted this
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2003 10:23:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 05:22:51 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from im01-noc-f01.acantho.it (futura) [213.174.164.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1NqB-0001ZS-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 05:22:47 -0500
Received: by futura (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AF823B0D7A; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:21:36 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2045672785=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation-report: Sarge Installation Report
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:21:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============2045672785==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: installation-report
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-22
Severity: normal
Installation Report Attached.
Thanks,
Guido
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--===============2045672785==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="/root/install-report"
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20030921
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2003/09/22
Method: Booting from the netinst cd, I used both cd and network sources for the
install. I was on a NAT-ted lan, not proxied.
Machine: HP Vectra
Processor: Intel PIII 800
Memory: 128MB
Root Device: Ide HD
Root Size/partition table:
Filesystem Size Mounted on
/dev/hda1 2.8G /
/dev/hda3 6.3G /var
/dev/hda2 256M swap
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82815 815 Chipset Host Bridge and Memory
Controller Hub (rev 02)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82815 CGC [Chipset Graphics
Controller] (rev 02)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801AA PCI Bridge (rev 02)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801AA ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 02)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801AA IDE (rev 02)
00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801AA USB (rev 02)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801AA SMBus (rev 02)
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801AA AC'97 Audio (rev 02)
01:04.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev 78)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
After rebooting the keymap I selected was not retained.
After rebooting the hostname for the machine was not retained, and localhost
was used instead.
Apart from that it has been a wonderful experience, and I had no problems at
all. I was following the published HOWTO. Since the bug in the partitioning
(209286) is solved from partitioner 0.07, maybe the paragraph which warned
not to use it can be removed from the above document (I actually used the
partitioner, since, after having a look at the bug it was closed, and I had
the right version of partitioner in the cd)
I also tried to use autopartkit, and it didn't work. Maybe this depends on
the fact that I tried it after having actually partitioned in the "classical
way" (in fact I only wanted to look at it and see what it proposed).
Ok, I had mounted partitions and the swap activated, but maybe autopartkit
could umount them, before doing anything (if this is the problem). After all
I allowed it to destroy my data, didn't I? ;) Anyway: using the automatic
partitioner gave some errors, and I don't know if it's because I already had
partition table or not...
Thanks for all, btw, I think the system is very nice! :)
Guido
--===============2045672785==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 212141-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2003 15:49:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 10:49:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.libero.it [193.70.192.51]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1SwC-0002SP-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:49:20 -0500
Received: from deathstar (151.38.127.155) by smtp1.libero.it (7.0.020-DD01)
id 3F6F0E48000085FC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:49:50
+0200
Received: from executor.studio.tixteam.net (executor [192.168.5.3])
by deathstar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3E77E42E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:34:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by executor.studio.tixteam.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0770D1FD61; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:32:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:32:15 +0200
From: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I already resubmitted this
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=4.0
tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Hi,
Sorry for the double bug submission. I first submitted the report to the
wrong package (installation-report) and then resent it to the right one.
Meanwhile the wrong one was reassigned to installation-reports package, so
I'm closing it report, since it's a copy of the other one.
Thanks,
Guido
