Dear wanna-build team,
gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-1) FTBFS on mips64el due to a compiler segfault:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/5/vector:69:0,
from sdk/pcidsk_segment.h:34,
from sdk/pcidsk_file.h:30,
from sdk/pcidsk.h:39,
f
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 at 01:49:08 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> python3-defaults now no longer depends on python3.4, making python3.5 the
> only supported python3 version. python3.4 should be removed before stretch
> is released (mostly by binNMUing, and then removing python3.4).
Packages that bui
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:34 AM, bancfc wrote:
> Hi. After the recent glibc debacle I came across a patch to harden this
> important library against common attack vectors. Please think about
> reviewing and adding in Debian. The author warned there may be some package
> breakage but nothing too se
On 2016-03-01 20:19:13 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Yep, that should be everything now. I'll look at getting an SUA sorted
> in the next few days.
Thank you.
> Regards,
>
> Adam
Sebastian
On 2016-03-01 20:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
You should file a bug against glibc if you want the glibc maintainers
to
consider that.
Emilio
Thanks for your suggestion. Feature request filed:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816436
On 01/03/2016 18:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/02/16 23:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> Hi,
>> see 812630/816228 (also discussed with Roland): Security team would to drop
>> jasper from stretch
>> (and eventually from the archive). Some high-profile users like gdk-pixbuf
>> already
On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 21:13 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-02-24 19:59:03 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > with the FTBFS of c-icap-modules (which doesn't appear to be clamav's
> > > > fault, but is blocking this being complete).
>
> c-icap-modules built everywhere. So we
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html
Bug #813916 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#813916 to the same
value
--
813916: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
On 01.03.2016 21:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/03/16 20:25, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: binnmu
>>
>> nmu hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
>> libvigraim
On 01/03/16 20:25, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
> libvigraimpex6"
> nmu enblend-enfuse_4.1.4+dfsg-5 . ANY . unstable .
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html
On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> I guess https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html is better
>> than https://release.debian.org/tra
On 2016-02-24 19:59:03 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > with the FTBFS of c-icap-modules (which doesn't appear to be clamav's
> > > fault, but is blocking this being complete).
c-icap-modules built everywhere. So we are done with clamav on old-stable and
stable unless I missed something. Puh.
On 01/03/16 20:34, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Hi. After the recent glibc debacle I came across a patch to harden this
> important library against common attack vectors. Please think about reviewing
> and adding in Debian. The author warned there may be some package breakage but
> nothing too s
Hi. After the recent glibc debacle I came across a patch to harden this
important library against common attack vectors. Please think about
reviewing and adding in Debian. The author warned there may be some
package breakage but nothing too serious:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/604
I a
Processing changes file: c-icap-modules_0.1.6-1+b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: c-icap-modules_0.1.6-1+b1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: c-icap-modules_0.1.6-1+b1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: c-icap-modules_0.1.6-1+b1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Proc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libvigraimpex6"
nmu enblend-enfuse_4.1.4+dfsg-5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
libvigraimpex6"
Hello,
both hugin an
On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wr
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #813916 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
813916: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813916
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 26/01/16 20:19, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.01.2016, 18:07 +0100 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo
> Monfort:
>> On 26/01/16 17:54, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>> Hi Emilio!
>>>
>>>
Can send another summary with your proposed plan here? Currently
libpng12-dev
provides libpng-
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php7.0.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 01/03/16 14:19, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a ben file for
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php7.0.html
Bug #816389 [release.debian.org] transition: php7.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php7.0.html'.
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #816389 [release.debian.org] t
On 28/02/16 23:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> see 812630/816228 (also discussed with Roland): Security team would to drop
> jasper from stretch
> (and eventually from the archive). Some high-profile users like gdk-pixbuf
> already had it
> dropped some time ago.
>
> Ok with the release tea
On 01/03/16 12:48, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:48:12PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 29/02/16 15:50, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
>>> Emilio,
>>>
>>> * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [160224 19:03]:
>>>
> ruby-zoom
>>>
>>> Could you try a g-b on mipsel for this?
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:17:46 +0100
with message-id <56d5dcca.8020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814367: transition: x265
has caused the Debian Bug report #814367,
regarding transition: x265
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
this is a ben file for src:php5 to src:php7.0 transition. I tried to
remove src:php5.6, src:php5.6-json and src:php7.0 from affected list
to only track packages that depend on main
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:48:12PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 29/02/16 15:50, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Emilio,
> >
> > * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [160224 19:03]:
> >
> >>> ruby-zoom
> >
> > Could you try a g-b on mipsel for this?
>
> Done.
Thanks; can you also please bin
Processing changes file: glibc_2.19-18+deb8u4_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
28 matches
Mail list logo
