On 01-03-16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>>>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released >>>>>> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt. >>>>>> >>>>>> GDAL 2.0.2 was released along with 1.11.4, but we still don't have >>>>>> support for GDAL 2.0 in all reverse dependencies. Since the transition >>>>>> to GDAL 1.11.3, support for GDAL 2.0 was added to all reverse >>>>>> depedencies except Fiona [0]. Upstream has recently included changes for >>>>>> GDAL 2.0, but these differ from the initial GDAL 2.0 changes available >>>>>> as a patch in #802808. The improved GDAL 2.0 changes are entangled with >>>>>> other changes for the upcoming Fiona 1.7 release, which I've not been >>>>>> able to successfully backport. This will not be a blocker for the GDAL >>>>>> 2.0 transition, as discussed with the maintainer on the debian-gis list >>>>>> [1]. >>>>>> >>>>>> Because the transition for GDAL 1.11.4 is ready now, I'd like to do that >>>>>> first before preparing the transition to GDAL 2.0. All reverse >>>>>> dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 1.11.4, the summary of >>>>>> rebuilds is included below. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This would get entangled with the openmpi transition, so it will have to >>>>> wait. >>>>> After openmpi, I'm thinking about doing libpng, but we'll see. >>>> >>>> Waiting for openmpi is no problem, but if the libpng transition is going >>>> to happen first, I think it's better to use that time the prepare the >>>> transition to GDAL 2.0 instead of 1.11.4. Last week the last blocker was >>>> resolved [0], so we're also pretty much ready to transition to GDAL 2.0. >>>> The 2.0 packages will have to pass the NEW queue again, because of the >>>> delay that will cause I've opted to transition to 1.11.4 which is ready >>>> now. >>>> >>>> If you can confirm that the libpng transition is going to happen first, >>>> I'll upload the packages for GDAL 2.0 to experimental, and we can switch >>>> to that in unstable after the libpng transition and the new gdal has >>>> passed NEW. >>> >>> Sure, let's do that. >> >> The GDAL 2.0.2 packages are available in experimental and ready for >> transition. >> >> libgdal-grass (2.0.2-1) not available in experimental yet, liblas and >> grass need to be rebuilt with GDAL 2.0 before it can be built too, >> because the SOVERSION is included in the binary package it builds the >> package will have to pass the NEW queue after upload first. To get it >> passed the NEW queue, I'll rebuild liblas & grass with gdal >> (2.0.2-1-1~exp2) from experimental and upload all three to experimental too. >> >> All reverse dependencies build successfully with GDAL 2.0. >> >> >> Transition: gdal >> >> libgdal1i (1.11.3+dfsg-3) -> libgdal20 (2.0.2+dfsg-1) >> libgdal.so.1-1.11.3 -> gdal-abi-2-0-2 >> >> The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows. >> >> dans-gdal-scripts (0.23-4) OK >> fiona (1.6.3-2) OK >> gazebo (6.5.0+dfsg-2) OK >> gmt (5.2.1+dfsg-3) OK >> imposm (2.6.0+ds-2) OK >> libcitygml (2.0-1) OK >> liblas (1.8.0-7) OK >> libosmium (2.6.0-1) OK >> mapcache (1.4.0-4) OK >> mapnik (3.0.9+ds-1) OK >> mapserver (7.0.0-9) OK >> merkaartor (0.18.2-5) OK >> mysql-workbench (6.3.4+dfsg-3) OK >> ncl (6.3.0-6) OK >> node-srs (0.4.8+dfsg-2) OK >> openscenegraph (3.2.1-9) OK >> osmium (0.0~20160124-b30afd3-1) OK >> osrm (4.9.1+ds-1~exp2) OK >> postgis (2.2.1+dfsg-2) OK >> pprepair (0.0~20150624-82a2019-1) OK >> prepair (0.7-4) OK >> qlandkartegt (1.8.1+ds-4) OK >> qmapshack (1.5.1-1) OK >> rasterio (0.31.0-2) OK >> saga (2.2.3+dfsg-1) OK >> sumo (0.25.0+dfsg1-2) OK >> thuban (1.2.2-9) OK >> vtk6 (6.2.0+dfsg1-7) OK >> xastir (2.0.6-4) OK >> >> grass (7.0.3-1) OK >> osgearth (2.5.0+dfsg-8 / 2.7.0+dfsg-1~exp5) OK / OK >> osmcoastline (2.1.2-1) OK >> pktools (2.6.6-1) OK >> pyosmium (2.6.0-1) OK >> >> libgdal-grass (1.11.3-3 / 2.0.2-1) FTBFS / OK >> qgis (2.8.6+dfsg-1) OK > > I guess https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html is better > than https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-1.11.4.html now?
Yes, the auto-gdal tracker is better. The tracker for 1.11.4 can be removed. > Let's do this. Thanks. I'll upload gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-1) to unstable shortly. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
