On 01/03/16 20:25, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against 
> libvigraimpex6"
> nmu enblend-enfuse_4.1.4+dfsg-5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against 
> libvigraimpex6"
> 
> Hello,
> 
> both hugin and enblend-enfuse were built (or binmued) against a broken
> version of libvigraimpex which shipped libvigraimpex.so.6 in a package
> still named libvigraimpex5v5. (#813415)

I haven't scheduled the appropriate binNMUs yet because libvigraimpex isn't
built everywhere.

Emilio

Reply via email to