Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:17:46 +0100
with message-id <56d5dcca.8020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814367: transition: x265
has caused the Debian Bug report #814367,
regarding transition: x265
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
814367: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814367
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html
It's this time of the year again. libx265 bumped its SONAME and requires a
transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new version
which is waiting in experimental.
Cheers
Ben file:
title = "x265";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libx265-68" | .depends ~ "libx265-76";
is_good = .depends ~ "libx265-76";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libx265-68";
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 10/02/16 22:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html
>
> It's this time of the year again. libx265 bumped its SONAME and requires a
> transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new version
> which is waiting in experimental.
This was waiting for gst-plugins-bad1.0 to migrate, which just happened this
morning.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
