Control: tags -1 confirmed On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released >>>>> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt. >>>>> >>>>> GDAL 2.0.2 was released along with 1.11.4, but we still don't have >>>>> support for GDAL 2.0 in all reverse dependencies. Since the transition >>>>> to GDAL 1.11.3, support for GDAL 2.0 was added to all reverse >>>>> depedencies except Fiona [0]. Upstream has recently included changes for >>>>> GDAL 2.0, but these differ from the initial GDAL 2.0 changes available >>>>> as a patch in #802808. The improved GDAL 2.0 changes are entangled with >>>>> other changes for the upcoming Fiona 1.7 release, which I've not been >>>>> able to successfully backport. This will not be a blocker for the GDAL >>>>> 2.0 transition, as discussed with the maintainer on the debian-gis list >>>>> [1]. >>>>> >>>>> Because the transition for GDAL 1.11.4 is ready now, I'd like to do that >>>>> first before preparing the transition to GDAL 2.0. All reverse >>>>> dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 1.11.4, the summary of >>>>> rebuilds is included below. >>>>> >>>> >>>> This would get entangled with the openmpi transition, so it will have to >>>> wait. >>>> After openmpi, I'm thinking about doing libpng, but we'll see. >>> >>> Waiting for openmpi is no problem, but if the libpng transition is going >>> to happen first, I think it's better to use that time the prepare the >>> transition to GDAL 2.0 instead of 1.11.4. Last week the last blocker was >>> resolved [0], so we're also pretty much ready to transition to GDAL 2.0. >>> The 2.0 packages will have to pass the NEW queue again, because of the >>> delay that will cause I've opted to transition to 1.11.4 which is ready now. >>> >>> If you can confirm that the libpng transition is going to happen first, >>> I'll upload the packages for GDAL 2.0 to experimental, and we can switch >>> to that in unstable after the libpng transition and the new gdal has >>> passed NEW. >> >> Sure, let's do that. > > The GDAL 2.0.2 packages are available in experimental and ready for > transition. > > libgdal-grass (2.0.2-1) not available in experimental yet, liblas and > grass need to be rebuilt with GDAL 2.0 before it can be built too, > because the SOVERSION is included in the binary package it builds the > package will have to pass the NEW queue after upload first. To get it > passed the NEW queue, I'll rebuild liblas & grass with gdal > (2.0.2-1-1~exp2) from experimental and upload all three to experimental too. > > All reverse dependencies build successfully with GDAL 2.0. > > > Transition: gdal > > libgdal1i (1.11.3+dfsg-3) -> libgdal20 (2.0.2+dfsg-1) > libgdal.so.1-1.11.3 -> gdal-abi-2-0-2 > > The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows. > > dans-gdal-scripts (0.23-4) OK > fiona (1.6.3-2) OK > gazebo (6.5.0+dfsg-2) OK > gmt (5.2.1+dfsg-3) OK > imposm (2.6.0+ds-2) OK > libcitygml (2.0-1) OK > liblas (1.8.0-7) OK > libosmium (2.6.0-1) OK > mapcache (1.4.0-4) OK > mapnik (3.0.9+ds-1) OK > mapserver (7.0.0-9) OK > merkaartor (0.18.2-5) OK > mysql-workbench (6.3.4+dfsg-3) OK > ncl (6.3.0-6) OK > node-srs (0.4.8+dfsg-2) OK > openscenegraph (3.2.1-9) OK > osmium (0.0~20160124-b30afd3-1) OK > osrm (4.9.1+ds-1~exp2) OK > postgis (2.2.1+dfsg-2) OK > pprepair (0.0~20150624-82a2019-1) OK > prepair (0.7-4) OK > qlandkartegt (1.8.1+ds-4) OK > qmapshack (1.5.1-1) OK > rasterio (0.31.0-2) OK > saga (2.2.3+dfsg-1) OK > sumo (0.25.0+dfsg1-2) OK > thuban (1.2.2-9) OK > vtk6 (6.2.0+dfsg1-7) OK > xastir (2.0.6-4) OK > > grass (7.0.3-1) OK > osgearth (2.5.0+dfsg-8 / 2.7.0+dfsg-1~exp5) OK / OK > osmcoastline (2.1.2-1) OK > pktools (2.6.6-1) OK > pyosmium (2.6.0-1) OK > > libgdal-grass (1.11.3-3 / 2.0.2-1) FTBFS / OK > qgis (2.8.6+dfsg-1) OK
I guess https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html is better than https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-1.11.4.html now? Let's do this. Cheers, Emilio
