On 01.03.2016 21:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 01/03/16 20:25, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: binnmu >> >> nmu hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against >> libvigraimpex6" >> nmu enblend-enfuse_4.1.4+dfsg-5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against >> libvigraimpex6" >> >> Hello, >> >> both hugin and enblend-enfuse were built (or binmued) against a broken >> version of libvigraimpex which shipped libvigraimpex.so.6 in a package >> still named libvigraimpex5v5. (#813415) > > I haven't scheduled the appropriate binNMUs yet because libvigraimpex isn't > built everywhere. > > Emilio
That is coming up shortly. Best DS -- 4096R/DF5182C8 http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
