Hi Zixing,
The newest stable upstream release is advertised in more than one way allowing
to write regular debian/watch files. Here below I give two working examples.
| version=4
|
https://forge.rust-lang.org/infra/other-installation-methods.html#source-code \
| https://static.rust-lang.org/d
Hello Zixing Liu,
Can I view an example of a package in Debian that can be watched with such
extension of fakeupstream? The link https://static.rust-lang.org/dist displays
an error in xml format. A real example would help me understand the context.
Ciao,
Bart
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 03:32:39PM
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:30:53AM +0200, debbug@sideload.33mail.com wrote:
> Debian bugs are mishandled too often, which suggests there is no
> oversight of mishandled cases. I have an example at hand:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026922
>
> A valid, credible bug
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 12:15:56AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> There are some improvements that we could make to QA services:
>
> * pass on HTTP error codes from services fakeupstream.cgi accesses
> * switch fakeupstream.cgi SourceForge support to using the RSS feed
> * switch fakeupstream.cgi/sf
Hello QA,
Can a red flag be added on mentors for packages not yet in Debian without ITP?
Cheers,
Bart
Hello, [addressed to the uploaders at mentors]
I see packages at mentors not yet in Debian and without ITP. One or more have
your name. Intentional? There should be a
Hello QA,
Is there some convenient way how sponsors/mentors can remove obsolete packages
from mentors?
Cheers,
Bart
__
Hello,
Some packages at mentors are older or equal to unstable. Could you remove the
packages from mentors unless some good reason not to?
ulfius 2.5.2-4
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:15:49PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 30/06/15 at 17:47 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > How different is mole's data schema from UDD's?
> >
> > I guess you already have access to UDD's data schema. Can you access
> >
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:30:48AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/06/15 at 16:47 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> &
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch. So
> > I
> > don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would
It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch. So I
don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would even run uscan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
For the record, if we want uscan results in udd, then I suggest getting them
from mole.watch where they are being kept up to date, and including sepwatch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tps://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debichem-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> (sf.net, other)
>
> For the latter many of the sf.net based projects are missing the
> upstream version in the output.
Good info.
Should be fixed now.
>
> Please feel free to forward this to the correct address.
I
The same problem is on https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mini-buildd.html .
The output of https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs contains this:
| debian-mangled-uversion: 0.8.20
| debian-uversion: 0.8.20
| messages: Not downloading as --package was used. Use --download to force
download
have been a general problem, because we have many packages with high retry
counts. I'm now lowering the retry counts manually to speed up processing.
The source code is here :
anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/mole/watch-requeue/watch-requeue.pl?view=markup
Look for "number of days to wa
Hello DSA,
It would be nice to get bug 712261 fixed on quantz. Can you upgrade devscripts
on quantz to 2.13.4~bpo70+1 or 2.13.9 please ? Or should the qa team install a
fixed copy of uscan locally so that there's no need to upgrade devscripts ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hello DSA,
Please apply the attached patch for the debian.org-qa.debian.org metapackage
from git://git.debian.org/git/mirror/debian.org.git and install the added
dependency on quantz accordingly. (This is related to adding a redirector for
gitorious to fakeupstream.cgi.)
Regards,
Bart Martens
Hi Hector,
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:29:45PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello Bart,
>
> 2013/11/6 Bart Martens :
> > Hello DSA,
> >
> > Please apply the attached patch for the debian.org-qa.debian.org metapackage
> > from git://git.debian.org/git/mirror/deb
Hello DSA,
Please apply the attached patch for the debian.org-qa.debian.org metapackage
from git://git.debian.org/git/mirror/debian.org.git and install the added
dependency on quantz accordingly.
Regards,
Bart Martens
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 5ce501e..b0d60fe 100644
Package: qa.debian.org
During the upgrade of quantz to wheezy we noticed that cgi-bin/udd-dehs was the
last script needing more memory. As I wrote on IRC :
a cgi script like that should produce so much info, looks like batch
processing instead of online cgi
maybe we should replace cgi-bin/udd
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:08:19PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 07:53:28PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> > Hi Bart,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 04:07:51 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:18:12PM +0200, Micha Lenk wr
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 07:53:28PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 04:07:51 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:18:12PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> >> [...] may I kindly ask you to remove the watch files for
> >&
more
relevant changes :
- escaping the dots in the file extension (.tar.gz should be \.tar\.gz)
- more file extensions (not only gz but also bz2 and xz)
- less strict version pattern ([\d.]*[a-z]*\d* should be \d\S*)
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debi
z)
> - $ANY_VERSION -> (?:\d\S*)
>
> Can you file a bug report against uscan ?
All good ideas. I would however add a nuance around the "zip" part. On some
websites a .zip and a .tar.gz file are both available, and then uscan should
select the .tar.gz file. I mean, uscan sho
org/projects/sepwatch/
For example, I just added this one :
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/sepwatch/trunk/watchfiles/r-other-bio3d_1.1-5-1.watch?view=markup
>
> I also have mixed feelings with what looks like a special priviledge for the
> QA
> team.
Well, anyone with an ali
s. If PTS still show "updated debian/watch" reminder after when
> watch file was updated in package then perhaps it is only natural to
> consider removing additional watch file in order to get rid of
> corresponding PTS warning...
Do you have examples ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
-
ixingWatchFiles#Removing_separate_watch_files
OK, thanks for confirming that.
>
> As Dmitry mentioned, in some cases disagreement with maintainer is possible,
> but such situations should be rare I think.
Rare indeed.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-r
these annoying strings on PTS pages will be placed forever.
Not true. The use of get-orig-sources in the package is unrelated to when the
notice disappears from the PTS.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
that discussion via private e-mail didn't
happen how you make it look in public now.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130711133253.ga2...@master.debian.org
quot; package is team
> (un-)maintained future uploaders will be inevitably confused with such
> suggestion.
The watch file included in cuetools 1.3.1-13 also uses that old mirror.
Other examples ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
he logic "too much and it's going to be
> useless/ignored", I don't agree that we must put a hard limit. We might
> have to tweak our rules to avoid too many such cases but then
> once we have something it should be understandable and relatively
> comp
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:24:56PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > There are RC bugs in dependencies : #579647 #545414 #658739 #566351
> > #368297 #601667 #658896 #628671
>
> Several of these bugs are merged, I think we sh
xperiment without the recursion, and see where it leads.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130510123132.ga13...@master.debian.org
are RC bugs in dependencies : #579647 #545414 #658739 #566351 #368297
#601667 #658896 #628671
Obviously each bug number would have a direct link to the bts page.
Comments ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &qu
Hi Neil,
Do you have access to add your name on line 83 ?
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/carnivore/extract_data?revision=2805&view=markup
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:45:01PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Bart Martens dixit:
>
> >It does happen. Upstream did change the file extension between versions 40
> >and
> >41. Checking for only one file extension is a common mistake, see:
>
> I *am* upstr
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 07:33:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Bart Martens dixit:
>
> >What would be bogus/broken/wrong about them ?
>
> cvs misses one mangle that's needed due to a DEHS bug,
No it doesn't. And your watch file won't see versions above
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 06:49:59PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Bart Martens dixit:
>
> >Which ones are bogus/broken/wrong ?
>
> At least mksh (we talked about it already) and cvs.
What would be bogus/broken/wrong about them ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:11:35PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Bart Martens dixit:
>
> >> Can you update the PTS so that it puts TODO items on the pages for
> >> packages with broken or overridden watch files?
> >
> >Good idea. I have done a few updat
ed: 404 File Not
> > Found
> > -- Scan finished
>
> What am I missing?
A slash on line 4.
1 version=3
2
3 opts=uversionmangle=s/\.(\d+)rc(\d+)/.$1~rc$2/ \
4 http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/asio/ \
5
(?:.*/|)asio[\-\._]?(\d+\.\d*[02468]\.\d+(?:rc\d+)?)\.(?:tar\
m.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/wml/developer.wml?view=markup
I understand that for section "Given DM permissions" this design can be
confusing. I'm now considering to modify the DDPO to show packages again in
section "Given DM permissions".
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
using
internal non-scalable font
| Options are 'nocrop medium size 800,600 '
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130303070216.ga32...@master.debian.org
he majority
> have been NMUed one way or other.
Which packages are not yet orphaned or team-maintained ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
A
Package: qa.debian.org
I read on http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/flashplugin-nonfree.html "The BTS
contains patches fixing 1 bug, consider including or untagging it" (indirectly)
linking to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687306 . Bug
687306 does have a patch, but is currently bl
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:29:32PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:06:32PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> > Host apgdiff.startnet.biz also gives the same result. Question is:
> > Why do you query apgdiff.startnet.biz? When i apt-get source the
> > package,
package
maintainer. I'm sure he must have had a good reason at the time.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130128212932.gb3...@master.debian.org
rent internet connection). For some
reason the host can be reached from where you are. No idea why this happens.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130128205544.ga3...@master.debian.org
lable, so IMO the PTS should consider the
> experimental version too.
As Paul already suggested, patches are welcome. In this case I would welcome a
patch that reflects the above-mentioned reasoning.
(This topic is better discussed on debian-qa.)
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UN
erimental, but
if the package in experimental is newer than the one in unstable, then PTS
should still display info about the package in unstable, in my opinion.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
quot;, declaring the format name and version.
> That would make it easy future migrations, if the need arises.
Or we could do that later when the need arises.
>
> I don't think the PTS code currently ignore #-commented lines, so that
> should be added too.
Same for DDPO. I have
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 07:11:10AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 09:09:19PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt"
> > and I propose we extend it to:
> >
> >source source-version
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 03:20:39PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
>
> > Do you mean "keep it" as in "keep doing thousands of pointless http/ftp
> > hits on
> > a regular basis just for a few hundred good uscan
teering to update DDPO for this, and I'll let you know when this is ready.
After that PTS and DDPO can be modified independently to display more
information than just about sid.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121230071110.gd4...@master.debian.org
nd that it may generate new useful watch files for
> future source packages so we should keep it.
Do you mean "keep it" as in "keep doing thousands of pointless http/ftp hits on
a regular basis just for a few hundred good uscan results" ? Or do you mean
"keep it&qu
ated watch files and add them to
/srv/qa.debian.org/data/watch/watchfiles/ and then turn off the use of
watch-wizard. Comments ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
th the effort of finding all details. The good thing
is that requeue.db was saved in mole/watch-requeue/watch-requeue/ so I restored
it from there. So all's well now, as far as I can see.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 03:14:59PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
>
> > I noticed that /srv/qa.debian.org/mole/watch-requeue/requeue.db disappeared
> > on
> > quantz. Did someone remove it accidentally ?
>
> That m
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 06:46:22AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that /srv/qa.debian.org/mole/watch-requeue/requeue.db disappeared on
> quantz. Did someone remove it accidentally ?
I have now restored a saved copy. Please talk to me before removing requeue.db
aga
Hi,
I noticed that /srv/qa.debian.org/mole/watch-requeue/requeue.db disappeared on
quantz. Did someone remove it accidentally ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:05:02PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:00:37PM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:59:14PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 06:37:12AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
&g
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:59:14PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 06:37:12AM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I suggest to implement the following instead :
>
> I understand your proposal, but it feels like overkill to me.
It's some work once
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:15:34PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 04:24:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> and maybe add something to DeveloperNews.
>
> Added a general QA section, if anyone has an
nd
should be updated to follow version 3.9.3 of Debian Policy.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121219063712.ga3...@master.debian.org
a.debian.org/depneedsmaint/depneedsmaint-dd-list.txt
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121218172806.gb5...@master.debian.org
//qa.debian.org/~bartm/depneedsmaint/depneedsmaint-dd-list.txt
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121218065132.ga7...@master.debian.org
ssages on the PTS pages
then people won't read them anymore. Other opinions on this ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121217072007.gf25...@master.debian.org
s", "-backports" );
The same script looks at relationships Build-Depends, Build-Depends-Indep,
Depends, Recommends and Suggests.
And the same script looks at packages with wnpp bugs O (orphaned) and RFA
(request for adoption).
Opinions on tuning these parameters ? Or are they OK
I have modified the PTS to no longer display the old DMUA flags.
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/pts/www/xsl/pts.xsl?r1=2868&r2=2867&pathrev=2868
At this point it is not visible on the PTS which DM has upload permission for
which package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:50:04AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On Fri, 23. Nov 21:44 Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:43:16PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > one month ago i have started a similar thread on debi
n.org/ftpmaster_Removals
I think it's OK to gather a few facts and decide to submit RM bugs if you're
convinced that removing the packages is the right choice without much feedback
gathering.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121123214421.gb26...@master.debian.org
Hi Marc,
I added a workaround.
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@debian.org
The solution is to learn carnivore about historical and actual data. That's
not for today. :-)
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
te and outdated backports ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121123095030.gb30...@master.debian.org
nmaintained packages that should be marked as
orphaned. (That's why I send this to debian-qa now.) A random example of a
package that looks pretty unmaintained at this point is tinymux.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:08:16AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
>
> > Suggestions/comments/questions/... most welcome.
>
> Can you update the PTS so that it puts TODO items on the pages for
> packages with broken or overridd
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:13:52AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > | Help fix debian/watch files. This report is updated daily :
> > | http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/watch/uscan-errors.txt
>
> Can
act_dehs.pl and DDPO to display different uscan results for unstable and
experimental.
Suggestions/comments/questions/... most welcome.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
on, then maybe patches like
this should go via the bts, or one could ask to be added as a member of the
alioth project.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=qa.debian.org#_0_10_4
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/collab-qa/
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
:
-rw--- 1 www-data qa 6 Nov 5 05:10
/srv/scratch/qa.debian.org/mole/todo/watch.todo.db.lock
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
:00 /bin/bash -e
/srv/qa.debian.org/data/cronjobs/ddpo.dm
qa 19314 19312 0 Oct19 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl -w
../extract_dm.pl
qa 19315 19314 0 Oct19 ?00:00:00 wget -q -O -
https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
/source/testing/figlet
http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/figlet
So where did you see those broken .dsc links ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
| upstream-version: 3.10.5
| upstream-url:
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/Z/ZODB3/ZODB3-3.10.5.tar.gz
| status: Debian version newer than remote site
| checked at: Sun Oct 28 10:03:14 2012
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
retitle 499546 PTS: shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when it is
waiting in NEW
user qa.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 499546 - dehs
usertags 499546 + pts
stop
I agree with the original bug report that it's a bug in PTS. DEHS contains
uscan results. An uscan result may b
Hi Jonathan,
News on this ?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690384
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
ntal overlap.
>
> With that done, I do not see the point of waiting an extra month.
I don't know where to look for such signal for non-DDs. I think that we should
still allow one month delay in less obvious cases.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-req
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:20:36AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/10/12 at 05:50 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > And the maintainer does not respond within one month after the the third
> > second.
>
> I'm not sure about this delay. This procedure should be used f
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:27:03AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.10.2012 07:50, Bart Martens wrote:
> >> - the submitter of the "intent to orphan" bug must Cc
> >> debian-qa@lists.debian.org, and file the bug with severity:serious (this
> &
proposer does not manage to attract support or even positive comments,
> then
>it either signals unwritten problems, or it asks the question whether the
> package
>should really stay in Debian.
I'm OK with adding an expiration date or a maximum duration. What maximum
durati
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> DEHS does not appear to allow for an epoch when considering
> watch files for the watch columns on the DDPO.
Do you have an example of where this goes wrong ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
case of backfire, people following the procedure would have the
> backing of a recommended procedure described in a semi-official document.
I agree that the procedure should at least be included in developers-reference.
I have no strong opinion on whether a GR would be needed.
>
> So,
creation of a review community for
> these kind of actions on -qa. Mumble mumble...
Posting them on -qa sounds like a good idea to me. Can you elaborate on that
"side-effect" ? I don't understand that part.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
o maintainer
anymore. RFA means that the maintainer still maintains the package but
requests someone to take over. Anyone can retitle the O or RFA to ITA and
adopt the package.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
d.
After the package is orphaned, the rest of the "salvaging" fits in the existing
procedures.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120928175223.ga2...@master.debian.org
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if a DD could see on his/her own DDPO page the list of
packages he/she has given DM permissions for. I suggest to list these packages
in a separate section named "Given DM permissions". I suggest to only list the
packages that are not ye
About the DDPO part of this bug report :
The old DMUA field in debian/control will stop working on the 24th of November
2012, so it is still in use today. So I have kept the existing [DM] tags
on the DDPO for now. The existing [DM] tags have black letters.
I have modified the DDPO to show the [
For completeness, the version for python-dmidecode is still pink because uscan
got "500 Can't connect to src.autonomy.net.au:80", and mathomatic is still pink
because 16.0.4-1 has not yet been processed by uscan, but I've queued that one,
so mathomatic should be OK soon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
| control system for the package and if it still exists.
|
Other than that, I read good info in your patch, so I think it's a good
addition.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
DDPO has been modified to consult the carnivore database by e-mail addresses in
a case insensitive way. So that is no longer blocking this bug in carnivore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
ution with grep-excuses, and that this
bug should just be closed.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201
ckage/kde-gtk-config
This package has "needs sponsor = no" at mentors.
http://mentors.debian.net/packages/index
Can you find an example with "needs sponsor = yes" ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
The approach is similar to how merging by some names is prevented.
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/carnivore/extract_data?r1=2761&r2=2762
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120817171653.ga17...@master.debian.org
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 17:47 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I have monitored this for a month, and I see that all mentors.xml files are
> > removed automatically after the package at mentors is removed. I guess that
&
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
